卢旺达基加利由私人和正规院前护理模式运送的外伤患者的流行病学和治疗效果比较

Q4 Medicine
J. Nzabandora, S. Bilal, L. Jing, M. B. Henry, A. Beeman, G. Mbanjumucyo, N. Rosenberg, J. Nyinawankusi, V. Sharma, V. Ndebwanimana, J. Muaragizi, E. Odoom, A. Aluisio
{"title":"卢旺达基加利由私人和正规院前护理模式运送的外伤患者的流行病学和治疗效果比较","authors":"J. Nzabandora, S. Bilal, L. Jing, M. B. Henry, A. Beeman, G. Mbanjumucyo, N. Rosenberg, J. Nyinawankusi, V. Sharma, V. Ndebwanimana, J. Muaragizi, E. Odoom, A. Aluisio","doi":"10.4314/rmj.v80i4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The burden of injuries is high in low- and middle-income countries where pre-hospital systems are being developed to improve acute injury care. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes between trauma patients transported by formal emergency medical services (EMS) and by private transport to the emergency department (ED) of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) in Rwanda. \nMETHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a random sample of trauma patients presenting between 1 August 2015 and 30 July 2016. Descriptive analyses were performed, and differences in outcomes were assessed based on transport modalities via Pearson Chi-Squared or Fisher’s Exact tests. \nRESULTS: Of the 556 trauma patients analyzed, 87.1% were transported by private transport and the remainder by EMS. The median inpatient length of stay for private transport patients was 7 days (IQR:3-16 days), compared to 9.5 days for EMS patients (IQR:4-18 days) (p=0.301). More EMS-transported patients died in the ED (p=0.005), and more were admitted to the hospital. There was a higher mortality rate among patients admitted to the hospital who arrived by private transport, but the difference was not statistically significant. \nCONCLUSION: The higher ED death rate among EMS-transported patients and the higher in-hospital death rate among private transport patients suggest that major differences in the two groups may or may not be related to how trauma patients are brought to the ED.","PeriodicalId":38181,"journal":{"name":"Rwanda Medical Journal","volume":"250 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative epidemiology and outcomes among trauma patients transported by private and formal pre-hospital care modes in Kigali, Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"J. Nzabandora, S. Bilal, L. Jing, M. B. Henry, A. Beeman, G. Mbanjumucyo, N. Rosenberg, J. Nyinawankusi, V. Sharma, V. Ndebwanimana, J. Muaragizi, E. Odoom, A. Aluisio\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/rmj.v80i4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The burden of injuries is high in low- and middle-income countries where pre-hospital systems are being developed to improve acute injury care. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes between trauma patients transported by formal emergency medical services (EMS) and by private transport to the emergency department (ED) of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) in Rwanda. \\nMETHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a random sample of trauma patients presenting between 1 August 2015 and 30 July 2016. Descriptive analyses were performed, and differences in outcomes were assessed based on transport modalities via Pearson Chi-Squared or Fisher’s Exact tests. \\nRESULTS: Of the 556 trauma patients analyzed, 87.1% were transported by private transport and the remainder by EMS. The median inpatient length of stay for private transport patients was 7 days (IQR:3-16 days), compared to 9.5 days for EMS patients (IQR:4-18 days) (p=0.301). More EMS-transported patients died in the ED (p=0.005), and more were admitted to the hospital. There was a higher mortality rate among patients admitted to the hospital who arrived by private transport, but the difference was not statistically significant. \\nCONCLUSION: The higher ED death rate among EMS-transported patients and the higher in-hospital death rate among private transport patients suggest that major differences in the two groups may or may not be related to how trauma patients are brought to the ED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rwanda Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"250 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rwanda Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v80i4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rwanda Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v80i4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:中低收入国家的伤害负担很重,这些国家正在开发院前系统以改善急性伤害护理。本研究比较了卢旺达基加利大学中心医院(CHUK)急诊科(ED)收治的由正规急救医疗服务(EMS)和私人运送的创伤患者的特征和治疗效果。方法:这项回顾性队列研究对2015年8月1日至2016年7月30日期间就诊的创伤患者进行了随机抽样分析。研究人员进行了描述性分析,并通过皮尔逊秩方检验或费雪精确检验评估了不同转运方式的结果差异。结果:在分析的556名创伤患者中,87.1%由私人交通工具运送,其余由急救中心运送。私家车转运患者的住院时间中位数为 7 天(IQR:3-16 天),而急救中心转运患者的住院时间中位数为 9.5 天(IQR:4-18 天)(P=0.301)。在急诊室死亡的急救病人更多(P=0.005),入院治疗的病人也更多。乘坐私人交通工具入院的患者死亡率较高,但差异无统计学意义。结论:由急救中心转运的患者在急诊室的死亡率较高,而由私人转运的患者在医院的死亡率较高,这表明两组患者的主要差异可能与创伤患者被送往急诊室的方式有关,也可能无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative epidemiology and outcomes among trauma patients transported by private and formal pre-hospital care modes in Kigali, Rwanda
INTRODUCTION: The burden of injuries is high in low- and middle-income countries where pre-hospital systems are being developed to improve acute injury care. This study compares the characteristics and outcomes between trauma patients transported by formal emergency medical services (EMS) and by private transport to the emergency department (ED) of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali (CHUK) in Rwanda. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a random sample of trauma patients presenting between 1 August 2015 and 30 July 2016. Descriptive analyses were performed, and differences in outcomes were assessed based on transport modalities via Pearson Chi-Squared or Fisher’s Exact tests. RESULTS: Of the 556 trauma patients analyzed, 87.1% were transported by private transport and the remainder by EMS. The median inpatient length of stay for private transport patients was 7 days (IQR:3-16 days), compared to 9.5 days for EMS patients (IQR:4-18 days) (p=0.301). More EMS-transported patients died in the ED (p=0.005), and more were admitted to the hospital. There was a higher mortality rate among patients admitted to the hospital who arrived by private transport, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The higher ED death rate among EMS-transported patients and the higher in-hospital death rate among private transport patients suggest that major differences in the two groups may or may not be related to how trauma patients are brought to the ED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rwanda Medical Journal
Rwanda Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Rwanda Medical Journal (RMJ), is a Not-For-Profit scientific, medical, journal that is published entirely online in open-access electronic format. The RMJ is an interdisciplinary research journal for publication of original work in all the major health disciplines. Through a rigorous process of evaluation and peer review, The RMJ strives to publish original works of high quality for a diverse audience of healthcare professionals. The Journal seeks to deepen knowledge and advance scientific discovery to improve the quality of care of patients in Rwanda and internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信