对二级和三级口腔外科远程术前评估可行性的初步观察

Q3 Dentistry
Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1111/ors.12879
Antonio Gagliardi‐Lugo, Monica Thomas, Rosario Mela, Adel Elrasheed
{"title":"对二级和三级口腔外科远程术前评估可行性的初步观察","authors":"Antonio Gagliardi‐Lugo, Monica Thomas, Rosario Mela, Adel Elrasheed","doi":"10.1111/ors.12879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic triggered an increased need in a method of delivering healthcare that simultaneously do not put patients at an increased risk of transmission. A remote consultation service (Telemed) for patients referred for dentoalveolar procedures was trialled.To investigate the outcome of the Telemeds and if treatment booked as a result of the Telemeds was successful, and could be made common practice.Data was collected from Telemeds between 04 August 2020 and 30 November 2020. Data collected included whether treatment was booked as a result of the Telemed, if the treatment was successfully completed at the resulting appointment (one‐stop treatment), if an additional face‐to‐face (F2F) consultation was required and any related reasons as to why this was the case.After 499 Telemeds, 46.3% (N = 231) of patients required a F2F appointment being booked, 43.0% (N = 215) resulted in treatment being booked, 6.6% (N = 33) were discharged and 4% (N = 20) of patients did not answer when contact was attempted. Of the 215 patients who had a Telemed that led to booking of treatment, 110 had attended their follow up appointment and 95.4% (N = 105) successfully had their treatment carried out in one visit.Remote consultations are a feasible, successful and useful tool in assessing and booking dentoalveolar cases suitable for one‐stop treatment under local anaesthesia, as long as there is a specific and organized triage process, regardless of the number of teeth to be extracted or the patient's medical history. Patients requiring general anaesthesia, sedation or further radiographic imaging did not benefit from Telemeds as they needed to attend F2F anyway for pre‐operative assessment or to have their further imaging taken in the department.","PeriodicalId":38418,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery","volume":"266 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial observations into the viability of remote preoperative assessment in secondary and tertiary oral surgery services\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Gagliardi‐Lugo, Monica Thomas, Rosario Mela, Adel Elrasheed\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ors.12879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic triggered an increased need in a method of delivering healthcare that simultaneously do not put patients at an increased risk of transmission. A remote consultation service (Telemed) for patients referred for dentoalveolar procedures was trialled.To investigate the outcome of the Telemeds and if treatment booked as a result of the Telemeds was successful, and could be made common practice.Data was collected from Telemeds between 04 August 2020 and 30 November 2020. Data collected included whether treatment was booked as a result of the Telemed, if the treatment was successfully completed at the resulting appointment (one‐stop treatment), if an additional face‐to‐face (F2F) consultation was required and any related reasons as to why this was the case.After 499 Telemeds, 46.3% (N = 231) of patients required a F2F appointment being booked, 43.0% (N = 215) resulted in treatment being booked, 6.6% (N = 33) were discharged and 4% (N = 20) of patients did not answer when contact was attempted. Of the 215 patients who had a Telemed that led to booking of treatment, 110 had attended their follow up appointment and 95.4% (N = 105) successfully had their treatment carried out in one visit.Remote consultations are a feasible, successful and useful tool in assessing and booking dentoalveolar cases suitable for one‐stop treatment under local anaesthesia, as long as there is a specific and organized triage process, regardless of the number of teeth to be extracted or the patient's medical history. Patients requiring general anaesthesia, sedation or further radiographic imaging did not benefit from Telemeds as they needed to attend F2F anyway for pre‐operative assessment or to have their further imaging taken in the department.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"volume\":\"266 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于 SARS-CoV-2 的流行,人们更加需要一种既能提供医疗服务又不会增加患者感染风险的方法。为了调查远程医疗的结果,以及远程医疗后预约的治疗是否成功,并使之成为普遍做法,我们对 2020 年 8 月 4 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间的远程医疗进行了数据收集。收集的数据包括远程医疗后是否预约了治疗,预约后是否成功完成了治疗(一站式治疗),是否需要额外的面对面(F2F)咨询,以及出现这种情况的相关原因。499 次远程医疗后,46.3%(N = 231)的患者需要预约 F2F,43.0%(N = 215)的患者预约了治疗,6.6%(N = 33)的患者出院,4%(N = 20)的患者在尝试联系时没有应答。远程会诊是一种可行、成功且有用的工具,只要有一个特定的、有组织的分诊过程,无论要拔除的牙齿数量或患者的病史如何,远程会诊都能评估和预约适合在局部麻醉下进行一站式治疗的牙槽骨病例。需要全身麻醉、镇静或进一步放射成像的患者无法从远程医疗中获益,因为他们无论如何都需要到口腔科进行术前评估或进一步成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial observations into the viability of remote preoperative assessment in secondary and tertiary oral surgery services
The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic triggered an increased need in a method of delivering healthcare that simultaneously do not put patients at an increased risk of transmission. A remote consultation service (Telemed) for patients referred for dentoalveolar procedures was trialled.To investigate the outcome of the Telemeds and if treatment booked as a result of the Telemeds was successful, and could be made common practice.Data was collected from Telemeds between 04 August 2020 and 30 November 2020. Data collected included whether treatment was booked as a result of the Telemed, if the treatment was successfully completed at the resulting appointment (one‐stop treatment), if an additional face‐to‐face (F2F) consultation was required and any related reasons as to why this was the case.After 499 Telemeds, 46.3% (N = 231) of patients required a F2F appointment being booked, 43.0% (N = 215) resulted in treatment being booked, 6.6% (N = 33) were discharged and 4% (N = 20) of patients did not answer when contact was attempted. Of the 215 patients who had a Telemed that led to booking of treatment, 110 had attended their follow up appointment and 95.4% (N = 105) successfully had their treatment carried out in one visit.Remote consultations are a feasible, successful and useful tool in assessing and booking dentoalveolar cases suitable for one‐stop treatment under local anaesthesia, as long as there is a specific and organized triage process, regardless of the number of teeth to be extracted or the patient's medical history. Patients requiring general anaesthesia, sedation or further radiographic imaging did not benefit from Telemeds as they needed to attend F2F anyway for pre‐operative assessment or to have their further imaging taken in the department.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信