是什么影响了用户对数字支付系统的偏好?(印度尼西亚电子钱包比较分析)

Ina Kartika Wati, A. M. Soma, Heri Ispriyahadi
{"title":"是什么影响了用户对数字支付系统的偏好?(印度尼西亚电子钱包比较分析)","authors":"Ina Kartika Wati, A. M. Soma, Heri Ispriyahadi","doi":"10.31098/ijebce.v4i1.2033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the growing internet usage and rapid advancements in information and communication technology. Indonesia has witnessed increased adoption of digital financial technology, particularly in the form of fintech and digital payment systems. It is crucial to differentiate the characteristics and advantages among Indonesia’s top three e-wallets: GoPay, OVO, and DANA. This study employs a comparative approach to analyze the relationship between user preferences and factors within GoPay, OVO, and DANA e-Wallets in the context of digital payment systems. Using a quantitative research approach and statistical verification. Data analysis employs SEM with the PLS method, involving 150 respondents whose results are compared across the platforms. The study finds that electronic service quality significantly impacts consumer loyalty and satisfaction across all three platforms. In GoPay and OVO, it notably influences satisfaction, but less so in DANA. Customer satisfaction mediate loyalty in GoPay and OVO but not in DANA. Responsiveness is a key component of e-wallet service excellence. Loyalty is influenced by referrals (GoPay and OVO), regular use (DANA), and pricing (DANA), whereas customer satisfaction (GoPay), pricing (DANA), and convenience (OVO) determine contentment. Limiting the study to three variables and three e-wallets may restrict the comprehensiveness of factors affecting consumer satisfaction and loyalty, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings to other digital payment platforms or market contexts. The novelty lies in the direct comparison of investigative outcomes among these three subjects within the context of digital payment systems, selecting high-value study indicators and advancing the prior research.","PeriodicalId":275205,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Creative Economy","volume":"227 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Influences User Preferences in Digital Payment Systems? (A Comparative Analysis of E-Wallet in Indonesia)\",\"authors\":\"Ina Kartika Wati, A. M. Soma, Heri Ispriyahadi\",\"doi\":\"10.31098/ijebce.v4i1.2033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research explores the growing internet usage and rapid advancements in information and communication technology. Indonesia has witnessed increased adoption of digital financial technology, particularly in the form of fintech and digital payment systems. It is crucial to differentiate the characteristics and advantages among Indonesia’s top three e-wallets: GoPay, OVO, and DANA. This study employs a comparative approach to analyze the relationship between user preferences and factors within GoPay, OVO, and DANA e-Wallets in the context of digital payment systems. Using a quantitative research approach and statistical verification. Data analysis employs SEM with the PLS method, involving 150 respondents whose results are compared across the platforms. The study finds that electronic service quality significantly impacts consumer loyalty and satisfaction across all three platforms. In GoPay and OVO, it notably influences satisfaction, but less so in DANA. Customer satisfaction mediate loyalty in GoPay and OVO but not in DANA. Responsiveness is a key component of e-wallet service excellence. Loyalty is influenced by referrals (GoPay and OVO), regular use (DANA), and pricing (DANA), whereas customer satisfaction (GoPay), pricing (DANA), and convenience (OVO) determine contentment. Limiting the study to three variables and three e-wallets may restrict the comprehensiveness of factors affecting consumer satisfaction and loyalty, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings to other digital payment platforms or market contexts. The novelty lies in the direct comparison of investigative outcomes among these three subjects within the context of digital payment systems, selecting high-value study indicators and advancing the prior research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Creative Economy\",\"volume\":\"227 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Creative Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31098/ijebce.v4i1.2033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Creative Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31098/ijebce.v4i1.2033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了互联网使用的不断增长以及信息和通信技术的快速发展。印尼越来越多地采用数字金融技术,尤其是金融科技和数字支付系统。区分印尼三大电子钱包的特点和优势至关重要:GoPay、OVO 和 DANA。本研究采用比较法,分析数字支付系统背景下 GoPay、OVO 和 DANA 电子钱包的用户偏好与因素之间的关系。采用定量研究方法和统计验证。数据分析采用 SEM 与 PLS 方法,涉及 150 名受访者,其结果在各平台间进行比较。研究发现,电子服务质量对所有三个平台的消费者忠诚度和满意度都有重大影响。在 GoPay 和 OVO 中,电子服务质量对满意度的影响明显,但在 DANA 中影响较小。在 GoPay 和 OVO,客户满意度对忠诚度有中介作用,但在 DANA 则没有。响应能力是电子钱包卓越服务的关键要素。忠诚度受推荐(GoPay 和 OVO)、定期使用(DANA)和定价(DANA)的影响,而客户满意度(GoPay)、定价(DANA)和便利性(OVO)则决定了满意度。将研究局限于三个变量和三种电子钱包可能会限制影响消费者满意度和忠诚度的因素的全面性,从而可能限制研究结果在其他数字支付平台或市场环境中的推广性。这项研究的新颖之处在于直接比较了数字支付系统背景下这三个研究对象的调查结果,选择了高价值的研究指标,推进了先前的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Influences User Preferences in Digital Payment Systems? (A Comparative Analysis of E-Wallet in Indonesia)
This research explores the growing internet usage and rapid advancements in information and communication technology. Indonesia has witnessed increased adoption of digital financial technology, particularly in the form of fintech and digital payment systems. It is crucial to differentiate the characteristics and advantages among Indonesia’s top three e-wallets: GoPay, OVO, and DANA. This study employs a comparative approach to analyze the relationship between user preferences and factors within GoPay, OVO, and DANA e-Wallets in the context of digital payment systems. Using a quantitative research approach and statistical verification. Data analysis employs SEM with the PLS method, involving 150 respondents whose results are compared across the platforms. The study finds that electronic service quality significantly impacts consumer loyalty and satisfaction across all three platforms. In GoPay and OVO, it notably influences satisfaction, but less so in DANA. Customer satisfaction mediate loyalty in GoPay and OVO but not in DANA. Responsiveness is a key component of e-wallet service excellence. Loyalty is influenced by referrals (GoPay and OVO), regular use (DANA), and pricing (DANA), whereas customer satisfaction (GoPay), pricing (DANA), and convenience (OVO) determine contentment. Limiting the study to three variables and three e-wallets may restrict the comprehensiveness of factors affecting consumer satisfaction and loyalty, potentially limiting the generalizability of findings to other digital payment platforms or market contexts. The novelty lies in the direct comparison of investigative outcomes among these three subjects within the context of digital payment systems, selecting high-value study indicators and advancing the prior research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信