调查哥伦比亚言语语言病理学家对嗓音听觉感知评估的培训和实践报告

Martha Peña Sanchez, Fernando Delprado-Aguirre
{"title":"调查哥伦比亚言语语言病理学家对嗓音听觉感知评估的培训和实践报告","authors":"Martha Peña Sanchez, Fernando Delprado-Aguirre","doi":"10.46634/riics.238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To explore the training and use of auditory perceptual evaluation of the voice reported by Colombian speech-language pathologists.\nStudy Design. Cross-sectional observational research with a quantitative approach.\nMethods. A digital questionnaire was designed and distributed to gather information regarding professionals' training process and implementation of auditory-perceptual evaluation procedures. Descriptive statistics were applied, and several generalized linear models were adjusted to determine the influence of certain variables on others.\nResults. The survey received responses from 40 speech-language pathologists, revealing that the most used scales for training and evaluating vocal quality within this group are direct magnitude estimations (82.5% and 77.5%). Similarly, in this group, the tasks most frequently used to train and use as an evaluation strategy are vowel assessments (38%) followed by spontaneous speech (30%). Practitioners of this group were mostly trained using a conceptual framework involving multiple exposures to rating (42.5%). The use of direct magnitude estimation in training with a normal voice showed significance (p = 0.015), as did the use of the vowel /i/ in training with an equal-appearing interval (p = 0.013). The statistical models relating the scale used to the scale on which participants were trained were also significant (p < 0.05).\nConclusions. The GRBAS scale is the training tool most used by the group of speech-language pathologists of the study group in Colombia. Future efforts should focus on improving training practices for auditory-perceptual evaluation, exploring alternative conceptual frameworks, and incorporating external references to enhance validity and reliability.","PeriodicalId":508578,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveying Colombian Speech-Language Pathologists on their Reported Training & Practices of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice\",\"authors\":\"Martha Peña Sanchez, Fernando Delprado-Aguirre\",\"doi\":\"10.46634/riics.238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To explore the training and use of auditory perceptual evaluation of the voice reported by Colombian speech-language pathologists.\\nStudy Design. Cross-sectional observational research with a quantitative approach.\\nMethods. A digital questionnaire was designed and distributed to gather information regarding professionals' training process and implementation of auditory-perceptual evaluation procedures. Descriptive statistics were applied, and several generalized linear models were adjusted to determine the influence of certain variables on others.\\nResults. The survey received responses from 40 speech-language pathologists, revealing that the most used scales for training and evaluating vocal quality within this group are direct magnitude estimations (82.5% and 77.5%). Similarly, in this group, the tasks most frequently used to train and use as an evaluation strategy are vowel assessments (38%) followed by spontaneous speech (30%). Practitioners of this group were mostly trained using a conceptual framework involving multiple exposures to rating (42.5%). The use of direct magnitude estimation in training with a normal voice showed significance (p = 0.015), as did the use of the vowel /i/ in training with an equal-appearing interval (p = 0.013). The statistical models relating the scale used to the scale on which participants were trained were also significant (p < 0.05).\\nConclusions. The GRBAS scale is the training tool most used by the group of speech-language pathologists of the study group in Colombia. Future efforts should focus on improving training practices for auditory-perceptual evaluation, exploring alternative conceptual frameworks, and incorporating external references to enhance validity and reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的探讨哥伦比亚语言病理学家报告的嗓音听觉评估的培训和使用情况。横断面观察研究,采用定量方法。设计并分发了一份数字问卷,以收集有关专业人员培训过程和听觉知觉评估程序执行情况的信息。采用了描述性统计方法,并调整了几个广义线性模型,以确定某些变量对其他变量的影响。调查收到了 40 位语言病理学家的回复,结果显示,该群体中最常用的声乐质量训练和评估量表是直接幅度估计(82.5% 和 77.5%)。同样,在这一群体中,最常用于训练和用作评估策略的任务是元音评估(38%),其次是自发语音(30%)。该组的从业人员大多采用多次暴露评级的概念框架进行培训(42.5%)。在使用正常声音进行训练时,使用直接幅度估算具有显著性(p = 0.015),在使用元音/i/进行等间隔训练时,使用直接幅度估算也具有显著性(p = 0.013)。使用的量表与参与者接受训练的量表之间的统计模型也有显著性(p < 0.05)。GRBAS量表是哥伦比亚研究小组中语言病理学家使用最多的培训工具。今后的工作重点应放在改进听觉知觉评估的培训实践、探索其他概念框架以及纳入外部参考资料以提高效度和信度上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surveying Colombian Speech-Language Pathologists on their Reported Training & Practices of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice
Objective. To explore the training and use of auditory perceptual evaluation of the voice reported by Colombian speech-language pathologists. Study Design. Cross-sectional observational research with a quantitative approach. Methods. A digital questionnaire was designed and distributed to gather information regarding professionals' training process and implementation of auditory-perceptual evaluation procedures. Descriptive statistics were applied, and several generalized linear models were adjusted to determine the influence of certain variables on others. Results. The survey received responses from 40 speech-language pathologists, revealing that the most used scales for training and evaluating vocal quality within this group are direct magnitude estimations (82.5% and 77.5%). Similarly, in this group, the tasks most frequently used to train and use as an evaluation strategy are vowel assessments (38%) followed by spontaneous speech (30%). Practitioners of this group were mostly trained using a conceptual framework involving multiple exposures to rating (42.5%). The use of direct magnitude estimation in training with a normal voice showed significance (p = 0.015), as did the use of the vowel /i/ in training with an equal-appearing interval (p = 0.013). The statistical models relating the scale used to the scale on which participants were trained were also significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The GRBAS scale is the training tool most used by the group of speech-language pathologists of the study group in Colombia. Future efforts should focus on improving training practices for auditory-perceptual evaluation, exploring alternative conceptual frameworks, and incorporating external references to enhance validity and reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信