澳大利亚提供的行为支持:对制定行为干预计划的从业人员的横断面调查

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Glenn Kelly, Peter Kremer, Kymberly Louise, Alinka Fisher
{"title":"澳大利亚提供的行为支持:对制定行为干预计划的从业人员的横断面调查","authors":"Glenn Kelly,&nbsp;Peter Kremer,&nbsp;Kymberly Louise,&nbsp;Alinka Fisher","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is currently a limited understanding of the characteristics of the workforce of behaviour support practitioners in Australia. A better understanding will help future considerations of training requirements, professional credentialling and associated professional regulation. A cross-sectional online survey captured the demographic and work-related characteristics of those who develop behaviour intervention plans for people with disability in Australia. The sample (<i>n</i> = 423) was primarily female (78 per cent), aged 26–45 years (57 per cent) and held a graduate (39 per cent) or postgraduate (53 per cent) degree. The largest single professional group was psychologists (28 per cent). The most common duration of experience was 1 year. Approximately half of the respondents were allied health practitioners either registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or a member of the National Alliance of Self-Regulating Health Professionals. The majority of practitioners had registered with the National Disability Insurance Scheme to provide behaviour support services (85 per cent). Both clients and services were concentrated in metropolitan regions, raising concerns regarding equity of access to behaviour support in remote communities, and among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Given the vulnerability of many people with disabilities in receipt of behaviour support, ongoing policy and procedure work is needed to ensure professional credentialling and regulation of the workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"59 4","pages":"1050-1069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviour support provision in Australia: A cross-sectional survey of practitioners developing behaviour intervention plans\",\"authors\":\"Glenn Kelly,&nbsp;Peter Kremer,&nbsp;Kymberly Louise,&nbsp;Alinka Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajs4.307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is currently a limited understanding of the characteristics of the workforce of behaviour support practitioners in Australia. A better understanding will help future considerations of training requirements, professional credentialling and associated professional regulation. A cross-sectional online survey captured the demographic and work-related characteristics of those who develop behaviour intervention plans for people with disability in Australia. The sample (<i>n</i> = 423) was primarily female (78 per cent), aged 26–45 years (57 per cent) and held a graduate (39 per cent) or postgraduate (53 per cent) degree. The largest single professional group was psychologists (28 per cent). The most common duration of experience was 1 year. Approximately half of the respondents were allied health practitioners either registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or a member of the National Alliance of Self-Regulating Health Professionals. The majority of practitioners had registered with the National Disability Insurance Scheme to provide behaviour support services (85 per cent). Both clients and services were concentrated in metropolitan regions, raising concerns regarding equity of access to behaviour support in remote communities, and among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Given the vulnerability of many people with disabilities in receipt of behaviour support, ongoing policy and procedure work is needed to ensure professional credentialling and regulation of the workforce.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"1050-1069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,人们对澳大利亚行为支持从业人员队伍的特点了解有限。更好的了解将有助于未来对培训要求、专业资格认证和相关专业监管的考虑。一项横向在线调查收集了澳大利亚为残疾人制定行为干预计划的从业人员的人口统计学特征和工作相关特征。样本(n = 423)主要为女性(78%),年龄在 26-45 岁之间(57%),拥有研究生学位(39%)或研究生学历(53%)。最大的单一专业群体是心理学家(28%)。最常见的工作经验为 1 年。约有一半的受访者是专职医疗从业者,他们要么在澳大利亚医疗从业者监管局注册,要么是全国自我监管医疗专业人员联盟的成员。大多数从业人员已在国家残疾人保险计划(National Disability Insurance Scheme)注册,以提供行为支持服务(85%)。客户和服务都集中在大都市地区,这引起了人们对偏远社区以及土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民公平获得行为支持服务的担忧。鉴于许多接受行为支持服务的残疾人的脆弱性,需要持续开展政策和程序工作,以确保专业资格认证和劳动力监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behaviour support provision in Australia: A cross-sectional survey of practitioners developing behaviour intervention plans

There is currently a limited understanding of the characteristics of the workforce of behaviour support practitioners in Australia. A better understanding will help future considerations of training requirements, professional credentialling and associated professional regulation. A cross-sectional online survey captured the demographic and work-related characteristics of those who develop behaviour intervention plans for people with disability in Australia. The sample (n = 423) was primarily female (78 per cent), aged 26–45 years (57 per cent) and held a graduate (39 per cent) or postgraduate (53 per cent) degree. The largest single professional group was psychologists (28 per cent). The most common duration of experience was 1 year. Approximately half of the respondents were allied health practitioners either registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or a member of the National Alliance of Self-Regulating Health Professionals. The majority of practitioners had registered with the National Disability Insurance Scheme to provide behaviour support services (85 per cent). Both clients and services were concentrated in metropolitan regions, raising concerns regarding equity of access to behaviour support in remote communities, and among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Given the vulnerability of many people with disabilities in receipt of behaviour support, ongoing policy and procedure work is needed to ensure professional credentialling and regulation of the workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信