F.I. Girenok 的激进原始主义和 "文化 "自我意识的逻辑

V. A. Belyaev
{"title":"F.I. Girenok 的激进原始主义和 \"文化 \"自我意识的逻辑","authors":"V. A. Belyaev","doi":"10.33920/nik-01-2401-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the speech of F.I. Girenok at the Philosophical Council in 2022. The author identifies two components in Girenko’s position. The first is primitivism in thinking. The author examines the logic of sociocultural primitivism in its many historical manifestations, highlighting its ideal-typical form. The logic of primitivism is revealed as a response to the negatively understood complexity of sociocultural existence. The second component is “cultural” self-awareness. The author reveals the logic of this type of self-awareness, contrasting it with “postcultural-intercultural” self-awareness. At the same time, the logic of the sociocultural development of humanity is affirmed as moving in a “postcultural” direction. The author reveals a negative version of “cultural” self-awareness as a closure on one’s system of ultimate ideas about the world. Girenko's philosophical position is considered as a combination of an extreme version of primitivism with an extreme version of “cultural” self-awareness.","PeriodicalId":143346,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy kul'turologii (Issues of Cultural Studies)","volume":"74 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Militant primitivism of F.I. Girenok and the logic of “cultural” self-awareness\",\"authors\":\"V. A. Belyaev\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/nik-01-2401-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the speech of F.I. Girenok at the Philosophical Council in 2022. The author identifies two components in Girenko’s position. The first is primitivism in thinking. The author examines the logic of sociocultural primitivism in its many historical manifestations, highlighting its ideal-typical form. The logic of primitivism is revealed as a response to the negatively understood complexity of sociocultural existence. The second component is “cultural” self-awareness. The author reveals the logic of this type of self-awareness, contrasting it with “postcultural-intercultural” self-awareness. At the same time, the logic of the sociocultural development of humanity is affirmed as moving in a “postcultural” direction. The author reveals a negative version of “cultural” self-awareness as a closure on one’s system of ultimate ideas about the world. Girenko's philosophical position is considered as a combination of an extreme version of primitivism with an extreme version of “cultural” self-awareness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy kul'turologii (Issues of Cultural Studies)\",\"volume\":\"74 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy kul'turologii (Issues of Cultural Studies)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/nik-01-2401-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy kul'turologii (Issues of Cultural Studies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/nik-01-2401-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了 F.I. 吉列诺克在 2022 年哲学委员会上的发言。作者指出了吉列诺克立场的两个组成部分。首先是思维的原始主义。作者研究了社会文化原始主义在其多种历史表现形式中的逻辑,强调了其理想的典型形式。原始主义的逻辑被揭示为对消极理解的社会文化存在的复杂性的回应。第二个组成部分是 "文化 "自我意识。作者揭示了这种自我意识的逻辑,并将其与 "后文化-跨文化 "自我意识进行了对比。同时,作者肯定了人类社会文化发展的逻辑是朝着 "后文化 "方向发展的。作者揭示了一种消极的 "文化 "自我意识,即对自己关于世界的终极思想体系的封闭。吉连科的哲学立场被认为是极端原始主义与极端 "文化 "自我意识的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Militant primitivism of F.I. Girenok and the logic of “cultural” self-awareness
The article analyzes the speech of F.I. Girenok at the Philosophical Council in 2022. The author identifies two components in Girenko’s position. The first is primitivism in thinking. The author examines the logic of sociocultural primitivism in its many historical manifestations, highlighting its ideal-typical form. The logic of primitivism is revealed as a response to the negatively understood complexity of sociocultural existence. The second component is “cultural” self-awareness. The author reveals the logic of this type of self-awareness, contrasting it with “postcultural-intercultural” self-awareness. At the same time, the logic of the sociocultural development of humanity is affirmed as moving in a “postcultural” direction. The author reveals a negative version of “cultural” self-awareness as a closure on one’s system of ultimate ideas about the world. Girenko's philosophical position is considered as a combination of an extreme version of primitivism with an extreme version of “cultural” self-awareness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信