人工智能有可能破坏科学的根基吗?

Sabine Zur Schlemmer
{"title":"人工智能有可能破坏科学的根基吗?","authors":"Sabine Zur Schlemmer","doi":"10.15354/si.24.re881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a paradigm shift in numerous industries and is persistently altering the methodology employed in scientific inquiry. Although AI has the potential to streamline specific facets of the scientific method, detractors contend that its integration could potentially erode the foundations of science. A potential issue arises when an excessive dependence on AI for data analysis and experimentation results in the erosion of human creativity and intuition as pivotal components in scientific breakthroughs. The propensity for fortuitous discoveries and innovative concepts to arise from ostensibly unrelated disciplines may be impeded by AI’s emphasis on identifying patterns in preexisting data sets. Moreover, algorithms employed in AI systems that rely on training data possess an intrinsic bias, which may introduce intangible prejudices into scientific investigation. Furthermore, it is critical to specify that AI is incapable of engaging in debates or comprehending profound philosophical inquiries pertaining to the fundamental principles that govern our universe. As a result, although AI has the potential to significantly aid scientists in their endeavors, it must be implemented with prudence to guarantee that it enhances rather than erodes the fundamental tenets and character of scientific investigation. \n ","PeriodicalId":484711,"journal":{"name":"Science insights","volume":"87 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is It Possible for Artificial Intelligence to Undermine the Root of Science?\",\"authors\":\"Sabine Zur Schlemmer\",\"doi\":\"10.15354/si.24.re881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a paradigm shift in numerous industries and is persistently altering the methodology employed in scientific inquiry. Although AI has the potential to streamline specific facets of the scientific method, detractors contend that its integration could potentially erode the foundations of science. A potential issue arises when an excessive dependence on AI for data analysis and experimentation results in the erosion of human creativity and intuition as pivotal components in scientific breakthroughs. The propensity for fortuitous discoveries and innovative concepts to arise from ostensibly unrelated disciplines may be impeded by AI’s emphasis on identifying patterns in preexisting data sets. Moreover, algorithms employed in AI systems that rely on training data possess an intrinsic bias, which may introduce intangible prejudices into scientific investigation. Furthermore, it is critical to specify that AI is incapable of engaging in debates or comprehending profound philosophical inquiries pertaining to the fundamental principles that govern our universe. As a result, although AI has the potential to significantly aid scientists in their endeavors, it must be implemented with prudence to guarantee that it enhances rather than erodes the fundamental tenets and character of scientific investigation. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":484711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science insights\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15354/si.24.re881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science insights","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15354/si.24.re881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)给许多行业带来了模式转变,并不断改变着科学探索所采用的方法。虽然人工智能有可能简化科学方法的特定方面,但反对者认为,人工智能的整合有可能侵蚀科学的基础。当过度依赖人工智能进行数据分析和实验,导致作为科学突破关键组成部分的人类创造力和直觉受到侵蚀时,潜在的问题就出现了。人工智能强调从已有的数据集中识别模式,这可能会阻碍表面上互不相关的学科产生偶然发现和创新概念的倾向。此外,依赖于训练数据的人工智能系统所采用的算法具有内在偏见,这可能会在科学调查中引入无形的偏见。此外,必须说明的是,人工智能无法参与辩论,也无法理解与支配我们宇宙的基本原则有关的深奥哲学问题。因此,尽管人工智能有可能极大地帮助科学家的工作,但在实施过程中必须谨慎,以确保它能加强而不是削弱科学研究的基本原则和特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is It Possible for Artificial Intelligence to Undermine the Root of Science?
Artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a paradigm shift in numerous industries and is persistently altering the methodology employed in scientific inquiry. Although AI has the potential to streamline specific facets of the scientific method, detractors contend that its integration could potentially erode the foundations of science. A potential issue arises when an excessive dependence on AI for data analysis and experimentation results in the erosion of human creativity and intuition as pivotal components in scientific breakthroughs. The propensity for fortuitous discoveries and innovative concepts to arise from ostensibly unrelated disciplines may be impeded by AI’s emphasis on identifying patterns in preexisting data sets. Moreover, algorithms employed in AI systems that rely on training data possess an intrinsic bias, which may introduce intangible prejudices into scientific investigation. Furthermore, it is critical to specify that AI is incapable of engaging in debates or comprehending profound philosophical inquiries pertaining to the fundamental principles that govern our universe. As a result, although AI has the potential to significantly aid scientists in their endeavors, it must be implemented with prudence to guarantee that it enhances rather than erodes the fundamental tenets and character of scientific investigation.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信