{"title":"评估心脏骤停患者院前气管插管的疗效:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Alan Silburn MPH FAWM","doi":"10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal airway management strategy during cardiac arrest remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to con-tribute to the literature on pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) during cardiac arrest by assessing its association with improved patient outcomes, specifically a higher incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Additionally, the study seeks to determine if ETI remains the best practice for airway management. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Medline Complete and CINAHL Complete databases. The PICOT formula guided the selection of search terms, and a systematic search strategy was employed. Inclusion criteria focused on English-language, peer-reviewed, full-text articles published between 2010 and 2020, with a preference for stud-ies conducted in pre-hospital settings. The search identified 78 eligible articles, with six high-quality studies included in the final analysis. Results: The included articles, primarily from the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Japan, involved a total of 341,286 participants. Meta-analysis results indicated no significant difference between ETI and control groups for 96.63% of pre-hospital cardiac arrests. The study participants received either ETI or basic airway management techniques, such as bag valve masks and supraglottic airway devices. The data suggests that ETI does not provide a substantial advantage over basic airway management techniques in terms of improving patient outcomes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the growing body of evidence suggesting that pre-hospital endotracheal intubation is not significantly associated with better outcomes in cardiac arrest cases compared to basic airway management tech-niques. While ETI is not linked to poorer patient outcomes, the study recommends further investigation to definitively con-firm whether pre-hospital endotracheal intubation increases a patient's chances of survival after cardiac arrest.","PeriodicalId":506697,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS","volume":"392 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Efficacy of Pre-hospital Endotracheal Intubation in Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alan Silburn MPH FAWM\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The optimal airway management strategy during cardiac arrest remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to con-tribute to the literature on pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) during cardiac arrest by assessing its association with improved patient outcomes, specifically a higher incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Additionally, the study seeks to determine if ETI remains the best practice for airway management. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Medline Complete and CINAHL Complete databases. The PICOT formula guided the selection of search terms, and a systematic search strategy was employed. Inclusion criteria focused on English-language, peer-reviewed, full-text articles published between 2010 and 2020, with a preference for stud-ies conducted in pre-hospital settings. The search identified 78 eligible articles, with six high-quality studies included in the final analysis. Results: The included articles, primarily from the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Japan, involved a total of 341,286 participants. Meta-analysis results indicated no significant difference between ETI and control groups for 96.63% of pre-hospital cardiac arrests. The study participants received either ETI or basic airway management techniques, such as bag valve masks and supraglottic airway devices. The data suggests that ETI does not provide a substantial advantage over basic airway management techniques in terms of improving patient outcomes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the growing body of evidence suggesting that pre-hospital endotracheal intubation is not significantly associated with better outcomes in cardiac arrest cases compared to basic airway management tech-niques. While ETI is not linked to poorer patient outcomes, the study recommends further investigation to definitively con-firm whether pre-hospital endotracheal intubation increases a patient's chances of survival after cardiac arrest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS\",\"volume\":\"392 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i01-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心脏骤停期间的最佳气道管理策略仍是一个争论不休的话题。本研究旨在通过评估院前气管插管(ETI)与改善患者预后的关系,特别是更高的自发循环恢复(ROSC)发生率,为有关心脏骤停期间院前气管插管(ETI)的文献做出贡献。此外,该研究还试图确定 ETI 是否仍是气道管理的最佳实践。方法:使用 Medline Complete 和 CINAHL Complete 数据库进行了全面的文献综述。在选择检索词时使用了 PICOT 公式和系统检索策略。纳入标准侧重于 2010 年至 2020 年间发表的经同行评审的英文全文文章,优先考虑在院前环境中开展的研究。搜索共发现 78 篇符合条件的文章,最终分析包括 6 项高质量的研究。结果:收录的文章主要来自美国、欧洲、英国和日本,共涉及 341286 名参与者。Meta 分析结果表明,在 96.63% 的院前心脏骤停患者中,ETI 组和对照组之间没有明显差异。研究参与者接受了 ETI 或基本气道管理技术,如袋阀面罩和声门上气道装置。数据表明,在改善患者预后方面,ETI 与基本气道管理技术相比并无实质性优势。结论:这项荟萃分析支持越来越多的证据表明,与基本气道管理技术相比,院前气管插管与更好的心脏骤停患者预后并无明显关联。虽然 ETI 与较差的患者预后无关,但该研究建议进行进一步调查,以明确证实院前气管插管是否会增加心脏骤停患者的存活机会。
Evaluating the Efficacy of Pre-hospital Endotracheal Intubation in Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis.
The optimal airway management strategy during cardiac arrest remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to con-tribute to the literature on pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) during cardiac arrest by assessing its association with improved patient outcomes, specifically a higher incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Additionally, the study seeks to determine if ETI remains the best practice for airway management. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the Medline Complete and CINAHL Complete databases. The PICOT formula guided the selection of search terms, and a systematic search strategy was employed. Inclusion criteria focused on English-language, peer-reviewed, full-text articles published between 2010 and 2020, with a preference for stud-ies conducted in pre-hospital settings. The search identified 78 eligible articles, with six high-quality studies included in the final analysis. Results: The included articles, primarily from the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, and Japan, involved a total of 341,286 participants. Meta-analysis results indicated no significant difference between ETI and control groups for 96.63% of pre-hospital cardiac arrests. The study participants received either ETI or basic airway management techniques, such as bag valve masks and supraglottic airway devices. The data suggests that ETI does not provide a substantial advantage over basic airway management techniques in terms of improving patient outcomes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the growing body of evidence suggesting that pre-hospital endotracheal intubation is not significantly associated with better outcomes in cardiac arrest cases compared to basic airway management tech-niques. While ETI is not linked to poorer patient outcomes, the study recommends further investigation to definitively con-firm whether pre-hospital endotracheal intubation increases a patient's chances of survival after cardiac arrest.