Laura B. Perry, Ee-Seul Yoon, M. Sciffer, Christopher Lubienski
{"title":"市场化对学校隔离以及教育公平和有效性的影响:澳大利亚和加拿大的证据","authors":"Laura B. Perry, Ee-Seul Yoon, M. Sciffer, Christopher Lubienski","doi":"10.1177/00207152241227810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While marketization has been promoted as a mechanism for improving educational equity and effectiveness, substantial evidence suggests that it may have the opposite effect. We contribute to this debate by examining educational equity and effectiveness in two similar countries that have embraced educational marketization to different degrees. Drawing on data from the Program for International Student Assessment and a causal-comparative design, we show that Australian schooling has more choice and competition, is more socially segregated, has larger school stratification of human and material resources, and has greater inequalities of educational outcomes and overall lower effectiveness than Canadian schooling. Our findings suggest that educational marketization reduces educational equity and effectiveness by increasing school social segregation and stratification of resources.","PeriodicalId":508754,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","volume":"58 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of marketization on school segregation and educational equity and effectiveness: Evidence from Australia and Canada\",\"authors\":\"Laura B. Perry, Ee-Seul Yoon, M. Sciffer, Christopher Lubienski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207152241227810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While marketization has been promoted as a mechanism for improving educational equity and effectiveness, substantial evidence suggests that it may have the opposite effect. We contribute to this debate by examining educational equity and effectiveness in two similar countries that have embraced educational marketization to different degrees. Drawing on data from the Program for International Student Assessment and a causal-comparative design, we show that Australian schooling has more choice and competition, is more socially segregated, has larger school stratification of human and material resources, and has greater inequalities of educational outcomes and overall lower effectiveness than Canadian schooling. Our findings suggest that educational marketization reduces educational equity and effectiveness by increasing school social segregation and stratification of resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Sociology\",\"volume\":\"58 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152241227810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152241227810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然市场化一直被宣传为提高教育公平和效率的机制,但大量证据表明,它可能会产生相反的效果。我们通过研究两个在不同程度上接受了教育市场化的类似国家的教育公平和效率,为这一争论做出了贡献。我们利用国际学生评估项目(Program for International Student Assessment)的数据和因果比较设计,表明澳大利亚的学校教育比加拿大的学校教育有更多的选择和竞争,社会隔离程度更高,学校的人力和物力资源分层更大,教育结果的不平等程度更高,总体效率更低。我们的研究结果表明,教育市场化加剧了学校的社会隔离和资源分层,从而降低了教育的公平性和有效性。
The impact of marketization on school segregation and educational equity and effectiveness: Evidence from Australia and Canada
While marketization has been promoted as a mechanism for improving educational equity and effectiveness, substantial evidence suggests that it may have the opposite effect. We contribute to this debate by examining educational equity and effectiveness in two similar countries that have embraced educational marketization to different degrees. Drawing on data from the Program for International Student Assessment and a causal-comparative design, we show that Australian schooling has more choice and competition, is more socially segregated, has larger school stratification of human and material resources, and has greater inequalities of educational outcomes and overall lower effectiveness than Canadian schooling. Our findings suggest that educational marketization reduces educational equity and effectiveness by increasing school social segregation and stratification of resources.