护理专业学生在手术室两种临床评估方法中的表现和反馈:准实验研究

Behzad Imani, Jeyran Asadi Hajivand
{"title":"护理专业学生在手术室两种临床评估方法中的表现和反馈:准实验研究","authors":"Behzad Imani, Jeyran Asadi Hajivand","doi":"10.5812/erms-137273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appropriate clinical evaluation methods correct educational errors, improve clinical training, and better judge students’ skills. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) on operating room students’ performance and satisfaction. Methods: One group was evaluated by the Mini-CEX method and the other by the OSCE method after random allocation. Feedback was subsequently collected, and data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding main demographic variables. The percentage of satisfaction with the evaluation method was higher in the Mini-CEX group, but this difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). The highest satisfaction was obtained for “fairness” in the OSCE group and “skill promotion” in the Mini-CEX group. The least satisfaction in both groups was related to “stressfulness.” The mean of final performance scores was significantly higher in the Mini-CEX group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although both the OSCE and Mini-CEX evaluation methods achieved acceptable satisfaction, the Mini-CEX evaluation method improved the operating room students’ performance in the clinical field. Therefore, this evaluation method is suggested to enhance the operating room students’ clinical skills.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"113 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Students’ Performance and Feedback on Two Clinical Evaluation Methods in Operating Room: A Quasi-Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Behzad Imani, Jeyran Asadi Hajivand\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/erms-137273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Appropriate clinical evaluation methods correct educational errors, improve clinical training, and better judge students’ skills. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) on operating room students’ performance and satisfaction. Methods: One group was evaluated by the Mini-CEX method and the other by the OSCE method after random allocation. Feedback was subsequently collected, and data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding main demographic variables. The percentage of satisfaction with the evaluation method was higher in the Mini-CEX group, but this difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). The highest satisfaction was obtained for “fairness” in the OSCE group and “skill promotion” in the Mini-CEX group. The least satisfaction in both groups was related to “stressfulness.” The mean of final performance scores was significantly higher in the Mini-CEX group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although both the OSCE and Mini-CEX evaluation methods achieved acceptable satisfaction, the Mini-CEX evaluation method improved the operating room students’ performance in the clinical field. Therefore, this evaluation method is suggested to enhance the operating room students’ clinical skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms-137273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms-137273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:适当的临床评估方法可纠正教学错误,改善临床培训,更好地判断学生的技能。目的:本研究旨在评估客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)和迷你临床评估练习的使用效果:本研究旨在评估客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)对手术室学生表现和满意度的影响。研究方法随机分配后,一组采用迷你临床评估练习法进行评估,另一组采用客观结构化临床考试法进行评估。随后收集反馈信息,并使用描述性和分析性统计学方法对数据进行分析。结果:两组在主要人口统计学变量方面无明显差异。Mini-CEX组对评估方法的满意度较高,但差异不明显(P>0.05)。OSCE 组对 "公平性 "和 Mini-CEX 组对 "技能提升 "的满意度最高。两组中满意度最低的是 "压力"。Mini-CEX 组的最终成绩平均分明显更高(P < 0.05)。结论:虽然 OSCE 和 Mini-CEX 两种评价方法都达到了可接受的满意度,但 Mini-CEX 评价方法提高了手术室学生的临床表现。因此,建议采用这种评价方法来提高手术室学生的临床技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nursing Students’ Performance and Feedback on Two Clinical Evaluation Methods in Operating Room: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Background: Appropriate clinical evaluation methods correct educational errors, improve clinical training, and better judge students’ skills. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) on operating room students’ performance and satisfaction. Methods: One group was evaluated by the Mini-CEX method and the other by the OSCE method after random allocation. Feedback was subsequently collected, and data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding main demographic variables. The percentage of satisfaction with the evaluation method was higher in the Mini-CEX group, but this difference was insignificant (P > 0.05). The highest satisfaction was obtained for “fairness” in the OSCE group and “skill promotion” in the Mini-CEX group. The least satisfaction in both groups was related to “stressfulness.” The mean of final performance scores was significantly higher in the Mini-CEX group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Although both the OSCE and Mini-CEX evaluation methods achieved acceptable satisfaction, the Mini-CEX evaluation method improved the operating room students’ performance in the clinical field. Therefore, this evaluation method is suggested to enhance the operating room students’ clinical skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信