湿地水体边界及其水源保护区(以俄罗斯联邦托木斯克州伊克萨河为例)

L. Chilinger, Nataliya V. Gatina, E. Pasechnik
{"title":"湿地水体边界及其水源保护区(以俄罗斯联邦托木斯克州伊克萨河为例)","authors":"L. Chilinger, Nataliya V. Gatina, E. Pasechnik","doi":"10.18799/24131830/2024/1/4429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Currently, there are a number of contradictions in defining the boundaries of water bodies, as well as special zones for their protection and use, because there is an urgent need for the correct establishment of such zones. In addition, the calculated probabilities for assessing the position of coastlines are not legally established. In this regard, the article examines the importance of reliably defining the boundaries of coastlines and river water protection zones in wetlands where there is the most contradictions. Aim. Comparative analysis of various methods for assessing the position of the coastline and the boundaries of the water protection zone of a river with a heavily swamped catchment. Methods. Statistical and cartographic methods, interpretation of space and aerial photographs. Results and conclusions. The authors have carried out the analysis of long-term data from routine hydrometeorological observations (1933–2007), materials from field surveys and interpretation of remote sensing data of the river Iksa section near the village Plotnikovo. It is shown that for this river the most rational way to assess the boundaries of a water body is to determine the average long-term maximum water level (the boundaries of the lower floodplain), and the boundaries of the water protection zone – by the maximum water level with a supply of 1% (the boundaries of the upper floodplain). These boundaries are quite noticeable during reconnaissance surveys during engineering studies and when using Earth remote sensing materials. All this increases the efficiency of environmental protection measures due to a more reasonable identification of water protection zones and makes it possible to optimize the methodology for determining their boundaries due to the use of these data instead of formal interpolation between observation points.","PeriodicalId":513946,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Borders of water bodies and their water protection zones in wetlands (based on the example of the Iksa river, Tomsk region, Russian Federation)\",\"authors\":\"L. Chilinger, Nataliya V. Gatina, E. Pasechnik\",\"doi\":\"10.18799/24131830/2024/1/4429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance. Currently, there are a number of contradictions in defining the boundaries of water bodies, as well as special zones for their protection and use, because there is an urgent need for the correct establishment of such zones. In addition, the calculated probabilities for assessing the position of coastlines are not legally established. In this regard, the article examines the importance of reliably defining the boundaries of coastlines and river water protection zones in wetlands where there is the most contradictions. Aim. Comparative analysis of various methods for assessing the position of the coastline and the boundaries of the water protection zone of a river with a heavily swamped catchment. Methods. Statistical and cartographic methods, interpretation of space and aerial photographs. Results and conclusions. The authors have carried out the analysis of long-term data from routine hydrometeorological observations (1933–2007), materials from field surveys and interpretation of remote sensing data of the river Iksa section near the village Plotnikovo. It is shown that for this river the most rational way to assess the boundaries of a water body is to determine the average long-term maximum water level (the boundaries of the lower floodplain), and the boundaries of the water protection zone – by the maximum water level with a supply of 1% (the boundaries of the upper floodplain). These boundaries are quite noticeable during reconnaissance surveys during engineering studies and when using Earth remote sensing materials. All this increases the efficiency of environmental protection measures due to a more reasonable identification of water protection zones and makes it possible to optimize the methodology for determining their boundaries due to the use of these data instead of formal interpolation between observation points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2024/1/4429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2024/1/4429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相关性。目前,在确定水体边界以及水体保护和使用特区方面存在一些矛盾,因为迫切需要正确设立此类特区。此外,评估海岸线位置的计算概率也没有法律依据。为此,文章探讨了在矛盾最多的湿地可靠地确定海岸线和河水保护区边界的重要性。目的。比较分析用于评估海岸线位置和具有严重沼泽集水区的河流水源保护区边界的各种方法。方法。统计和制图方法、空间和航空照片判读。结果和结论。作者对常规水文气象观测的长期数据(1933-2007 年)、实地调查材料以及 Plotnikovo 村附近伊克萨河河段的遥感数据解读进行了分析。结果表明,对该河流而言,评估水体边界的最合理方法是确定长期平均最高水位(下洪泛区的边界),而水保护区的边界--以补给 1%的最高水位为准(上洪泛区的边界)。在工程研究期间进行勘测和使用地球遥感材料时,这些边界非常明显。所有这一切都提高了环境保护措施的效率,因为可以更合理地确定水源保护区,而且由于使用了这些数据而不是观测点之间的形式插值,可以优化确定水源保护区边界的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Borders of water bodies and their water protection zones in wetlands (based on the example of the Iksa river, Tomsk region, Russian Federation)
Relevance. Currently, there are a number of contradictions in defining the boundaries of water bodies, as well as special zones for their protection and use, because there is an urgent need for the correct establishment of such zones. In addition, the calculated probabilities for assessing the position of coastlines are not legally established. In this regard, the article examines the importance of reliably defining the boundaries of coastlines and river water protection zones in wetlands where there is the most contradictions. Aim. Comparative analysis of various methods for assessing the position of the coastline and the boundaries of the water protection zone of a river with a heavily swamped catchment. Methods. Statistical and cartographic methods, interpretation of space and aerial photographs. Results and conclusions. The authors have carried out the analysis of long-term data from routine hydrometeorological observations (1933–2007), materials from field surveys and interpretation of remote sensing data of the river Iksa section near the village Plotnikovo. It is shown that for this river the most rational way to assess the boundaries of a water body is to determine the average long-term maximum water level (the boundaries of the lower floodplain), and the boundaries of the water protection zone – by the maximum water level with a supply of 1% (the boundaries of the upper floodplain). These boundaries are quite noticeable during reconnaissance surveys during engineering studies and when using Earth remote sensing materials. All this increases the efficiency of environmental protection measures due to a more reasonable identification of water protection zones and makes it possible to optimize the methodology for determining their boundaries due to the use of these data instead of formal interpolation between observation points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信