用机器人绘制亲和图

IF 4.2 Q2 ROBOTICS
Matthew V. Law, Nnamdi Nwagwu, Amritansh Kwatra, Seo-young Lee, Daniel M. DiAngelis, Naifang Yu, Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Amit Rajesh, Guy Hoffman
{"title":"用机器人绘制亲和图","authors":"Matthew V. Law, Nnamdi Nwagwu, Amritansh Kwatra, Seo-young Lee, Daniel M. DiAngelis, Naifang Yu, Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Amit Rajesh, Guy Hoffman","doi":"10.1145/3641514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate what it might look like for a robot to work with a human on a needfinding design task using an affinity diagram. While some recent projects have examined how human-robot teams might explore solutions to design problems, human-robot collaboration in the sensemaking aspects of the design process has not been studied. Designers use affinity diagrams to make sense of unstructured information by clustering paper notes on a work surface. To explore human-robot collaboration on a sensemaking design activity, we developed HIRO, an autonomous robot that constructs affinity diagrams with humans. In a within-user study, 56 participants affinity-diagrammed themes to characterize needs in quotes taken from real-world user data, once alone, and once with HIRO. Users spent more time on the task with HIRO than alone, without strong evidence for corresponding effects on cognitive load. In addition, a majority of participants said they preferred to work with HIRO. From post-interaction interviews, we identified eight themes leading to four guidelines for robots that collaborate with humans on sensemaking design tasks: (1) account for the robot’s speed; (2) pursue mutual understanding rather than just correctness; (3) identify opportunities for constructive disagreements; (4) use other modes of communication in addition to physical materials.","PeriodicalId":36515,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affinity Diagramming with a Robot\",\"authors\":\"Matthew V. Law, Nnamdi Nwagwu, Amritansh Kwatra, Seo-young Lee, Daniel M. DiAngelis, Naifang Yu, Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Amit Rajesh, Guy Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3641514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate what it might look like for a robot to work with a human on a needfinding design task using an affinity diagram. While some recent projects have examined how human-robot teams might explore solutions to design problems, human-robot collaboration in the sensemaking aspects of the design process has not been studied. Designers use affinity diagrams to make sense of unstructured information by clustering paper notes on a work surface. To explore human-robot collaboration on a sensemaking design activity, we developed HIRO, an autonomous robot that constructs affinity diagrams with humans. In a within-user study, 56 participants affinity-diagrammed themes to characterize needs in quotes taken from real-world user data, once alone, and once with HIRO. Users spent more time on the task with HIRO than alone, without strong evidence for corresponding effects on cognitive load. In addition, a majority of participants said they preferred to work with HIRO. From post-interaction interviews, we identified eight themes leading to four guidelines for robots that collaborate with humans on sensemaking design tasks: (1) account for the robot’s speed; (2) pursue mutual understanding rather than just correctness; (3) identify opportunities for constructive disagreements; (4) use other modes of communication in addition to physical materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3641514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3641514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用亲和图研究了机器人与人类合作完成需求搜索设计任务的情况。虽然最近的一些项目研究了人类与机器人团队如何共同探索设计问题的解决方案,但在设计过程的感知制造方面,人类与机器人的合作还没有被研究过。设计人员使用 "亲和图 "来理解非结构化信息,将纸质笔记集中在工作面上。为了探索人与机器人在感性设计活动中的协作,我们开发了一个能与人类一起构建亲和图的自主机器人 HIRO。在一项用户内部研究中,56 名参与者分别单独和与 HIRO 一起对主题进行了亲和图绘制,以描述真实世界用户数据中的需求。与单独使用 HIRO 相比,用户在这项任务上花费的时间更长,但没有有力证据表明这对认知负荷产生了相应的影响。此外,大多数参与者表示他们更喜欢与 HIRO 一起工作。从互动后的访谈中,我们发现了八个主题,为机器人与人类合作完成感知设计任务提供了四条指导原则:(1) 考虑到机器人的速度;(2) 追求相互理解,而不仅仅是正确性;(3) 找出建设性分歧的机会;(4) 除了物理材料外,还要使用其他交流方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Affinity Diagramming with a Robot
We investigate what it might look like for a robot to work with a human on a needfinding design task using an affinity diagram. While some recent projects have examined how human-robot teams might explore solutions to design problems, human-robot collaboration in the sensemaking aspects of the design process has not been studied. Designers use affinity diagrams to make sense of unstructured information by clustering paper notes on a work surface. To explore human-robot collaboration on a sensemaking design activity, we developed HIRO, an autonomous robot that constructs affinity diagrams with humans. In a within-user study, 56 participants affinity-diagrammed themes to characterize needs in quotes taken from real-world user data, once alone, and once with HIRO. Users spent more time on the task with HIRO than alone, without strong evidence for corresponding effects on cognitive load. In addition, a majority of participants said they preferred to work with HIRO. From post-interaction interviews, we identified eight themes leading to four guidelines for robots that collaborate with humans on sensemaking design tasks: (1) account for the robot’s speed; (2) pursue mutual understanding rather than just correctness; (3) identify opportunities for constructive disagreements; (4) use other modes of communication in addition to physical materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) is a prestigious Gold Open Access journal that aspires to lead the field of human-robot interaction as a top-tier, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication. The journal prioritizes articles that significantly contribute to the current state of the art, enhance overall knowledge, have a broad appeal, and are accessible to a diverse audience. Submissions are expected to meet a high scholarly standard, and authors are encouraged to ensure their research is well-presented, advancing the understanding of human-robot interaction, adding cutting-edge or general insights to the field, or challenging current perspectives in this research domain. THRI warmly invites well-crafted paper submissions from a variety of disciplines, encompassing robotics, computer science, engineering, design, and the behavioral and social sciences. The scholarly articles published in THRI may cover a range of topics such as the nature of human interactions with robots and robotic technologies, methods to enhance or enable novel forms of interaction, and the societal or organizational impacts of these interactions. The editorial team is also keen on receiving proposals for special issues that focus on specific technical challenges or that apply human-robot interaction research to further areas like social computing, consumer behavior, health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信