什么是土著方法论?

Kristina Sehlin MacNeil
{"title":"什么是土著方法论?","authors":"Kristina Sehlin MacNeil","doi":"10.54807/kp.v23.21691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many indigenous researchers have described Indigenous Methodologies as alternative ways of thinking about research processes. This article aims to give an introduction to Indigenous Methodologies and to locate them in relation to the qualitative research field. In addition epistemological aspects of indigenous research models are contrasted with mainstream Western approaches in order to open up for a conversation on the use of multiple epistemologies. The article concludes with a discussion on whom Indigenous Methodologies are available to and poses the hopeful proposition that space might be created for Indigenous Methodologies within mainstream academia.","PeriodicalId":141494,"journal":{"name":"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vad är urfolksmetodologier?\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Sehlin MacNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.54807/kp.v23.21691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many indigenous researchers have described Indigenous Methodologies as alternative ways of thinking about research processes. This article aims to give an introduction to Indigenous Methodologies and to locate them in relation to the qualitative research field. In addition epistemological aspects of indigenous research models are contrasted with mainstream Western approaches in order to open up for a conversation on the use of multiple epistemologies. The article concludes with a discussion on whom Indigenous Methodologies are available to and poses the hopeful proposition that space might be created for Indigenous Methodologies within mainstream academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v23.21691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulturella Perspektiv – Svensk etnologisk tidskrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v23.21691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多本土研究人员将本土方法论描述为思考研究过程的另一种方式。本文旨在介绍土著方法论,并将其与定性研究领域联系起来。此外,本文还将土著研究模式的认识论方面与西方主流方法进行对比,以便就多重认识论的使用展开对话。文章最后讨论了土著方法论的适用对象,并提出了在主流学术界为土著方法论创造空间的充满希望的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vad är urfolksmetodologier?
Many indigenous researchers have described Indigenous Methodologies as alternative ways of thinking about research processes. This article aims to give an introduction to Indigenous Methodologies and to locate them in relation to the qualitative research field. In addition epistemological aspects of indigenous research models are contrasted with mainstream Western approaches in order to open up for a conversation on the use of multiple epistemologies. The article concludes with a discussion on whom Indigenous Methodologies are available to and poses the hopeful proposition that space might be created for Indigenous Methodologies within mainstream academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信