转型协议对出版模式的影响

Caitlin J. Bakker, Allison Langham-Putrow, Amy Riegelman
{"title":"转型协议对出版模式的影响","authors":"Caitlin J. Bakker, Allison Langham-Putrow, Amy Riegelman","doi":"10.23974/ijol.2024.vol8.4.341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Transformative agreements\" are agreements made between publishers and institutions that were intended to transform the traditional subscription-based scholarly publishing system to open access. Some publishers and institutions have argued that these are the best option, yet, they are increasingly being called into question. Not only does the transition remain incomplete, they create negative effects on researchers without access to an agreement or funding to pay an article processing charge. This research project sought to address the question of whether transformative agreements increase the number of open access publications. In April 2022, we retrieved 370 transformative agreements from the ESAC Transformative Agreement Registry, of which 72 met our inclusion criteria. At that time, agreements in the ESAC Registry were heavily weighted towards Europe. We retrieved publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, and screened these to ensure that they were authored by researchers at participating institutions and published in hybrid open access journals covered by the agreement. Using the Unpaywall API, we determined the open access status of each item. Through this process, we identified 156,053 publications that met inclusion criteria. In this article, we examine changes in publication patterns at an aggregate level and per agreement.","PeriodicalId":198561,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Librarianship","volume":"363 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Transformative Agreements on Publication Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin J. Bakker, Allison Langham-Putrow, Amy Riegelman\",\"doi\":\"10.23974/ijol.2024.vol8.4.341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Transformative agreements\\\" are agreements made between publishers and institutions that were intended to transform the traditional subscription-based scholarly publishing system to open access. Some publishers and institutions have argued that these are the best option, yet, they are increasingly being called into question. Not only does the transition remain incomplete, they create negative effects on researchers without access to an agreement or funding to pay an article processing charge. This research project sought to address the question of whether transformative agreements increase the number of open access publications. In April 2022, we retrieved 370 transformative agreements from the ESAC Transformative Agreement Registry, of which 72 met our inclusion criteria. At that time, agreements in the ESAC Registry were heavily weighted towards Europe. We retrieved publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, and screened these to ensure that they were authored by researchers at participating institutions and published in hybrid open access journals covered by the agreement. Using the Unpaywall API, we determined the open access status of each item. Through this process, we identified 156,053 publications that met inclusion criteria. In this article, we examine changes in publication patterns at an aggregate level and per agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"363 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol8.4.341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2024.vol8.4.341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"转型协议 "是出版商和机构之间达成的协议,旨在将传统的订阅式学术出版系统转型为开放式获取。一些出版商和机构认为这些协议是最佳选择,然而,它们正日益受到质疑。不仅转型仍未完成,它们还对没有协议或资金支付文章处理费的研究人员造成了负面影响。本研究项目试图解决转型协议是否会增加开放存取出版物数量的问题。2022 年 4 月,我们从 ESAC 转化协议注册中心检索到 370 份转化协议,其中 72 份符合我们的纳入标准。当时,ESAC 注册表中的协议主要集中在欧洲。我们从 "科学网"(Web of Science Core Collection)中检索了出版物,并对这些出版物进行了筛选,以确保它们由参与机构的研究人员撰写,并发表在协议涵盖的混合开放存取期刊上。我们使用 Unpaywall API 确定了每个项目的开放存取状态。通过这一过程,我们确定了 156,053 篇符合纳入标准的出版物。在这篇文章中,我们将从总体层面和每项协议的角度研究发表模式的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Transformative Agreements on Publication Patterns
"Transformative agreements" are agreements made between publishers and institutions that were intended to transform the traditional subscription-based scholarly publishing system to open access. Some publishers and institutions have argued that these are the best option, yet, they are increasingly being called into question. Not only does the transition remain incomplete, they create negative effects on researchers without access to an agreement or funding to pay an article processing charge. This research project sought to address the question of whether transformative agreements increase the number of open access publications. In April 2022, we retrieved 370 transformative agreements from the ESAC Transformative Agreement Registry, of which 72 met our inclusion criteria. At that time, agreements in the ESAC Registry were heavily weighted towards Europe. We retrieved publications from the Web of Science Core Collection, and screened these to ensure that they were authored by researchers at participating institutions and published in hybrid open access journals covered by the agreement. Using the Unpaywall API, we determined the open access status of each item. Through this process, we identified 156,053 publications that met inclusion criteria. In this article, we examine changes in publication patterns at an aggregate level and per agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信