"COVID-19 疫苗是什么样的?- 从认知框架到同义命题

N. Guliashvili
{"title":"\"COVID-19 疫苗是什么样的?- 从认知框架到同义命题","authors":"N. Guliashvili","doi":"10.19044/esj.2024.v20n2p174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frames and propositions are supposed to be cognitive acts that play a significant role in the perception of reality and the enactment of discursive practices. The linguistic scrutiny of the Covid-19 pandemic discourse could shed light on how the figurative language, similes in particular, are conceptualized by the cognitive structures and represented discursively as surface-level manifestations of the pandemic reality. Thus, the present research is concerned with the analysis of discursive as well as cognitive structures of the figurative language to delineate on relevant theoretical stances. To scrutinize how similes work on a discursive dimension, a discourse analysis is applied, which qualitatively characterizes the concordance lists of the target lingual units obtained from The Coronavirus Corpus https://www.english-corpora.org/corona/. As for the investigation of the cognitive basis of similes, source and target entities/ concepts are identified to focus on the propositional structures. The paper argues that similes as opposed to metaphors explicitly expound propositions and communicative frames in the discourse to avoid incipient cognitive ambiguity of the comparison. The two-fold cognitive shift is evident, which morphs a cognitive proposition into a textual one and lessens the exact sameness. Moreover, discursive elaboration of a simile as a short explanatory phrase transforms into a mini explanatory narrative to provide rational for the novel source concepts of comparison (i.e., computer software, technology, and adventure), which could be rather complex for the human mind to perceive. As it appears, similes may come forward as more tangible cognitive-discursive structures that assist the human mind to cope with novel cognitive comparisons.","PeriodicalId":12225,"journal":{"name":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","volume":"383 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What’s COVID-19 Vaccine Like?” – From A Cognitive Frame to A Similative Proposition\",\"authors\":\"N. Guliashvili\",\"doi\":\"10.19044/esj.2024.v20n2p174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Frames and propositions are supposed to be cognitive acts that play a significant role in the perception of reality and the enactment of discursive practices. The linguistic scrutiny of the Covid-19 pandemic discourse could shed light on how the figurative language, similes in particular, are conceptualized by the cognitive structures and represented discursively as surface-level manifestations of the pandemic reality. Thus, the present research is concerned with the analysis of discursive as well as cognitive structures of the figurative language to delineate on relevant theoretical stances. To scrutinize how similes work on a discursive dimension, a discourse analysis is applied, which qualitatively characterizes the concordance lists of the target lingual units obtained from The Coronavirus Corpus https://www.english-corpora.org/corona/. As for the investigation of the cognitive basis of similes, source and target entities/ concepts are identified to focus on the propositional structures. The paper argues that similes as opposed to metaphors explicitly expound propositions and communicative frames in the discourse to avoid incipient cognitive ambiguity of the comparison. The two-fold cognitive shift is evident, which morphs a cognitive proposition into a textual one and lessens the exact sameness. Moreover, discursive elaboration of a simile as a short explanatory phrase transforms into a mini explanatory narrative to provide rational for the novel source concepts of comparison (i.e., computer software, technology, and adventure), which could be rather complex for the human mind to perceive. As it appears, similes may come forward as more tangible cognitive-discursive structures that assist the human mind to cope with novel cognitive comparisons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Scientific Journal, ESJ\",\"volume\":\"383 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Scientific Journal, ESJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n2p174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n2p174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

框架和命题应该是一种认知行为,在感知现实和实施话语实践中发挥着重要作用。对 "Covid-19 "疫情话语进行语言学审视,可以揭示具象语言(尤其是比喻)如何被认知结构概念化,并被话语表述为疫情现实的表层表现。因此,本研究关注对具象语言的话语结构和认知结构进行分析,以界定相关的理论立场。为了仔细研究比喻如何在话语维度上发挥作用,本研究采用了话语分析方法,对从冠状病毒语料库(The Coronavirus Corpus https://www.english-corpora.org/corona/)中获得的目标语言单位对照表进行了定性分析。至于对比喻认知基础的研究,则确定了源实体和目标实体/概念,以关注命题结构。本文认为,与隐喻相比,比喻在话语中明确阐述了命题和交际框架,以避免比较中可能出现的认知歧义。这种认知上的双重转变是显而易见的,它将认知命题变形为文本命题,减少了确切的同一性。此外,作为简短解释性短语的比喻的话语阐释转化为微型解释性叙述,为比较的新颖来源概念(即计算机软件、技术和探险)提供了合理性,而这些概念对于人的大脑来说可能是相当复杂的。由此看来,比喻可以作为一种更具体的认知-辨证结构,帮助人类思维应对新颖的认知比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“What’s COVID-19 Vaccine Like?” – From A Cognitive Frame to A Similative Proposition
Frames and propositions are supposed to be cognitive acts that play a significant role in the perception of reality and the enactment of discursive practices. The linguistic scrutiny of the Covid-19 pandemic discourse could shed light on how the figurative language, similes in particular, are conceptualized by the cognitive structures and represented discursively as surface-level manifestations of the pandemic reality. Thus, the present research is concerned with the analysis of discursive as well as cognitive structures of the figurative language to delineate on relevant theoretical stances. To scrutinize how similes work on a discursive dimension, a discourse analysis is applied, which qualitatively characterizes the concordance lists of the target lingual units obtained from The Coronavirus Corpus https://www.english-corpora.org/corona/. As for the investigation of the cognitive basis of similes, source and target entities/ concepts are identified to focus on the propositional structures. The paper argues that similes as opposed to metaphors explicitly expound propositions and communicative frames in the discourse to avoid incipient cognitive ambiguity of the comparison. The two-fold cognitive shift is evident, which morphs a cognitive proposition into a textual one and lessens the exact sameness. Moreover, discursive elaboration of a simile as a short explanatory phrase transforms into a mini explanatory narrative to provide rational for the novel source concepts of comparison (i.e., computer software, technology, and adventure), which could be rather complex for the human mind to perceive. As it appears, similes may come forward as more tangible cognitive-discursive structures that assist the human mind to cope with novel cognitive comparisons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信