牛骨粉对石灰稳定土部分工程特性的影响

F. Ayodele, T. Ajijola, Ohunene Usman, Jonathan Segun Adekanmi
{"title":"牛骨粉对石灰稳定土部分工程特性的影响","authors":"F. Ayodele, T. Ajijola, Ohunene Usman, Jonathan Segun Adekanmi","doi":"10.4028/p-v0qpkz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the influence of cow bone powder (CBP) on consistency and compaction characteristics of lime-stabilized soil. Twelve soil samples were collected from four routes connecting Ado-Ekiti. Index and compaction tests were performed on the natural and stabilized samples. The soil samples were classified according to AASHTO groups and eventually restructured into four (4) groups: A-6, A-7-6, A-4, and A-7-5. They were named samples A, B, C, and D respectively. The oxide compositions of the samples were determined. Lime was blended with soils at proportions of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,10 %, and the optimal lime content (LimeOpt) was obtained. The LimeOpt + soil mixture was mixed with 2, 4, 6, 8,10 % of CBP. The Soil + LimeOpt + CBP mixtures were subjected to consistency limits and compaction tests. Plasticity index (PI) of soils A, B, C, and D was 14.19, 21.06, 11.64, and 14.19 % respectively, while the MDD was 1640, 1730, 1630, and 1631 kg/m3. Soil A, B, C, and D + LimeOpt all had reduced PIs of 7.68, 16.40, 5.04, and 12.05%, respectively. For the MDD of soil + LimeOpt mixtures, 1789, 1920, 1906, and 1898 kg/m3 were also found for Samples A, B, C, and D. Soil + LimeOpt + CBP showed that both the PI (from 0.6 to 81.7%) and MDD (from 0.1 to 14.6%) improved. On the other hand, the addition of lime to soils A, B, C, and D showed that 8% lime content offered the optimal CBR performance. Further addition of CBP to the soil + LimeOpt mixtures equally improved both the soaked and unsoaked CBR of soils A, B, C, and D predominantly with 6% CBP addition offering the peak performance. This suggests that CBP is viable and can save cost, mitigate environmental hazards, and complement lime. Strength and durability evaluation of the ternary mixture is however recommended.","PeriodicalId":7271,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials Research","volume":"353 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Cow Bone Powder on Selected Engineering Properties of Lime-Stabilized Soil\",\"authors\":\"F. Ayodele, T. Ajijola, Ohunene Usman, Jonathan Segun Adekanmi\",\"doi\":\"10.4028/p-v0qpkz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the influence of cow bone powder (CBP) on consistency and compaction characteristics of lime-stabilized soil. Twelve soil samples were collected from four routes connecting Ado-Ekiti. Index and compaction tests were performed on the natural and stabilized samples. The soil samples were classified according to AASHTO groups and eventually restructured into four (4) groups: A-6, A-7-6, A-4, and A-7-5. They were named samples A, B, C, and D respectively. The oxide compositions of the samples were determined. Lime was blended with soils at proportions of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,10 %, and the optimal lime content (LimeOpt) was obtained. The LimeOpt + soil mixture was mixed with 2, 4, 6, 8,10 % of CBP. The Soil + LimeOpt + CBP mixtures were subjected to consistency limits and compaction tests. Plasticity index (PI) of soils A, B, C, and D was 14.19, 21.06, 11.64, and 14.19 % respectively, while the MDD was 1640, 1730, 1630, and 1631 kg/m3. Soil A, B, C, and D + LimeOpt all had reduced PIs of 7.68, 16.40, 5.04, and 12.05%, respectively. For the MDD of soil + LimeOpt mixtures, 1789, 1920, 1906, and 1898 kg/m3 were also found for Samples A, B, C, and D. Soil + LimeOpt + CBP showed that both the PI (from 0.6 to 81.7%) and MDD (from 0.1 to 14.6%) improved. On the other hand, the addition of lime to soils A, B, C, and D showed that 8% lime content offered the optimal CBR performance. Further addition of CBP to the soil + LimeOpt mixtures equally improved both the soaked and unsoaked CBR of soils A, B, C, and D predominantly with 6% CBP addition offering the peak performance. This suggests that CBP is viable and can save cost, mitigate environmental hazards, and complement lime. Strength and durability evaluation of the ternary mixture is however recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Materials Research\",\"volume\":\"353 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Materials Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-v0qpkz\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-v0qpkz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了牛骨粉(CBP)对石灰稳定土壤的稠度和压实特性的影响。研究人员从连接阿多-埃基蒂(Ado-Ekiti)的四条线路上采集了 12 个土壤样本。对天然样本和稳定样本进行了指数和压实度测试。根据 AASHTO 组别对土壤样本进行了分类,最终重组为四(4)组:A-6、A-7-6、A-4 和 A-7-5。它们分别被命名为样本 A、B、C 和 D。对样本的氧化物成分进行了测定。石灰与土壤的混合比例分别为 0、2、4、6、8、10%,并得出了最佳石灰含量(LimeOpt)。在石灰Opt + 土壤混合物中分别掺入 2%、4%、6%、8%、10% 的 CBP。土壤 + LimeOpt + CBP 混合物进行了稠度极限和压实度试验。土壤 A、B、C 和 D 的塑性指数(PI)分别为 14.19%、21.06%、11.64% 和 14.19%,而 MDD 分别为 1640、1730、1630 和 1631 kg/m3。土壤 A、B、C 和 D + LimeOpt 的 PI 分别降低了 7.68%、16.40%、5.04% 和 12.05%。土壤 + LimeOpt 混合物的 MDD 在样本 A、B、C 和 D 中也分别为 1789、1920、1906 和 1898 kg/m3。土壤 + LimeOpt + CBP 的 PI(从 0.6% 提高到 81.7%)和 MDD(从 0.1% 提高到 14.6%)都有所改善。另一方面,在土壤 A、B、C 和 D 中添加石灰后,8% 的石灰含量可提供最佳 CBR 性能。在土壤+石灰-Opt 混合物中进一步添加 CBP,同样能改善土壤 A、B、C 和 D 的浸水和非浸水 CBR,其中以添加 6% 的 CBP 性能最佳。这表明 CBP 是可行的,它可以节约成本、减轻环境危害并与石灰互补。不过,建议对三元混合物进行强度和耐久性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Cow Bone Powder on Selected Engineering Properties of Lime-Stabilized Soil
This study investigates the influence of cow bone powder (CBP) on consistency and compaction characteristics of lime-stabilized soil. Twelve soil samples were collected from four routes connecting Ado-Ekiti. Index and compaction tests were performed on the natural and stabilized samples. The soil samples were classified according to AASHTO groups and eventually restructured into four (4) groups: A-6, A-7-6, A-4, and A-7-5. They were named samples A, B, C, and D respectively. The oxide compositions of the samples were determined. Lime was blended with soils at proportions of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,10 %, and the optimal lime content (LimeOpt) was obtained. The LimeOpt + soil mixture was mixed with 2, 4, 6, 8,10 % of CBP. The Soil + LimeOpt + CBP mixtures were subjected to consistency limits and compaction tests. Plasticity index (PI) of soils A, B, C, and D was 14.19, 21.06, 11.64, and 14.19 % respectively, while the MDD was 1640, 1730, 1630, and 1631 kg/m3. Soil A, B, C, and D + LimeOpt all had reduced PIs of 7.68, 16.40, 5.04, and 12.05%, respectively. For the MDD of soil + LimeOpt mixtures, 1789, 1920, 1906, and 1898 kg/m3 were also found for Samples A, B, C, and D. Soil + LimeOpt + CBP showed that both the PI (from 0.6 to 81.7%) and MDD (from 0.1 to 14.6%) improved. On the other hand, the addition of lime to soils A, B, C, and D showed that 8% lime content offered the optimal CBR performance. Further addition of CBP to the soil + LimeOpt mixtures equally improved both the soaked and unsoaked CBR of soils A, B, C, and D predominantly with 6% CBP addition offering the peak performance. This suggests that CBP is viable and can save cost, mitigate environmental hazards, and complement lime. Strength and durability evaluation of the ternary mixture is however recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信