经皮肾镜碎石术中透视知识和使用方面的全球差异--我们是否应该做得更好?欧洲泌尿外科协会泌尿技术分会和国际尿路结石联盟的一项调查

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Otaš Durutovic , Guohua Zeng , Bhaskar Somani , Simon Choong , Giorgio Mazzon , Di Gu , Zeeshan Hameed , TP Rajeev , Bogomir Milojevic , Davide Brusa , Tiago Ribeiro Oliveira , Sergio Pereira , Nariman Gadzhiev , Ali Serdar Gozen , Evangelos Liatsikos , Panagiotis Kallidonis , Uros Bumbasirevic , Andreas Skolarikos
{"title":"经皮肾镜碎石术中透视知识和使用方面的全球差异--我们是否应该做得更好?欧洲泌尿外科协会泌尿技术分会和国际尿路结石联盟的一项调查","authors":"Otaš Durutovic ,&nbsp;Guohua Zeng ,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani ,&nbsp;Simon Choong ,&nbsp;Giorgio Mazzon ,&nbsp;Di Gu ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Hameed ,&nbsp;TP Rajeev ,&nbsp;Bogomir Milojevic ,&nbsp;Davide Brusa ,&nbsp;Tiago Ribeiro Oliveira ,&nbsp;Sergio Pereira ,&nbsp;Nariman Gadzhiev ,&nbsp;Ali Serdar Gozen ,&nbsp;Evangelos Liatsikos ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Kallidonis ,&nbsp;Uros Bumbasirevic ,&nbsp;Andreas Skolarikos","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge among urologists of usage of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an anonymous internet-based survey addressed to the EAU Section of Uro-Technology and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis members with particular interest in the stone treatment at all levels of expertise. The final version of the questionnaire included 31 questions, evaluated the level of knowledge on X-ray utilization and exposure, and identified correlations between geographic areas, levels of seniority, surgical volumes, and awareness on radiation protection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 586 respondents were included. Knowledge of fluoroscopy settings appeared low, particularly among trainees (up to 87.5% were uninformed, <em>p</em>=0.008). Precautions to reduce exposure appeared poorly followed as up to 25.4% of respondents used regularly continuous fluoroscopy, and up to 20.5% used regularly high-frequency setting and this trend was more obvious among senior specialists (6.2% of trainees used high-frequency settings <em>vs.</em> 21.3% of consultants, <em>p</em>&lt;0.05). Additionally, only 24.9% of respondents would provide X-ray protection to patients too.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although high and routinary utilization of X-rays, the level of awareness and adhesion to “as low as reasonably achievable” principles among endourologists seems suboptimal in 65.0% of all respondents. Highest volume surgeons, inevitably at higher risk, do not seem to adopt more precautions. More efforts should be addressed to improve these results, reducing the risk related to excessive radiation exposure for both surgical staff and patients in order to minimize health related issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide variations in the knowledge and use of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy—should we do better? A survey by the European Association of Urology Section for Uro-Technology and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis\",\"authors\":\"Otaš Durutovic ,&nbsp;Guohua Zeng ,&nbsp;Bhaskar Somani ,&nbsp;Simon Choong ,&nbsp;Giorgio Mazzon ,&nbsp;Di Gu ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Hameed ,&nbsp;TP Rajeev ,&nbsp;Bogomir Milojevic ,&nbsp;Davide Brusa ,&nbsp;Tiago Ribeiro Oliveira ,&nbsp;Sergio Pereira ,&nbsp;Nariman Gadzhiev ,&nbsp;Ali Serdar Gozen ,&nbsp;Evangelos Liatsikos ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Kallidonis ,&nbsp;Uros Bumbasirevic ,&nbsp;Andreas Skolarikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajur.2024.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge among urologists of usage of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an anonymous internet-based survey addressed to the EAU Section of Uro-Technology and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis members with particular interest in the stone treatment at all levels of expertise. The final version of the questionnaire included 31 questions, evaluated the level of knowledge on X-ray utilization and exposure, and identified correlations between geographic areas, levels of seniority, surgical volumes, and awareness on radiation protection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 586 respondents were included. Knowledge of fluoroscopy settings appeared low, particularly among trainees (up to 87.5% were uninformed, <em>p</em>=0.008). Precautions to reduce exposure appeared poorly followed as up to 25.4% of respondents used regularly continuous fluoroscopy, and up to 20.5% used regularly high-frequency setting and this trend was more obvious among senior specialists (6.2% of trainees used high-frequency settings <em>vs.</em> 21.3% of consultants, <em>p</em>&lt;0.05). Additionally, only 24.9% of respondents would provide X-ray protection to patients too.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although high and routinary utilization of X-rays, the level of awareness and adhesion to “as low as reasonably achievable” principles among endourologists seems suboptimal in 65.0% of all respondents. Highest volume surgeons, inevitably at higher risk, do not seem to adopt more precautions. More efforts should be addressed to improve these results, reducing the risk related to excessive radiation exposure for both surgical staff and patients in order to minimize health related issues.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224000158\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224000158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worldwide variations in the knowledge and use of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy—should we do better? A survey by the European Association of Urology Section for Uro-Technology and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the level of knowledge among urologists of usage of fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Methods

We conducted an anonymous internet-based survey addressed to the EAU Section of Uro-Technology and the International Alliance of Urolithiasis members with particular interest in the stone treatment at all levels of expertise. The final version of the questionnaire included 31 questions, evaluated the level of knowledge on X-ray utilization and exposure, and identified correlations between geographic areas, levels of seniority, surgical volumes, and awareness on radiation protection.

Results

In total, 586 respondents were included. Knowledge of fluoroscopy settings appeared low, particularly among trainees (up to 87.5% were uninformed, p=0.008). Precautions to reduce exposure appeared poorly followed as up to 25.4% of respondents used regularly continuous fluoroscopy, and up to 20.5% used regularly high-frequency setting and this trend was more obvious among senior specialists (6.2% of trainees used high-frequency settings vs. 21.3% of consultants, p<0.05). Additionally, only 24.9% of respondents would provide X-ray protection to patients too.

Conclusion

Although high and routinary utilization of X-rays, the level of awareness and adhesion to “as low as reasonably achievable” principles among endourologists seems suboptimal in 65.0% of all respondents. Highest volume surgeons, inevitably at higher risk, do not seem to adopt more precautions. More efforts should be addressed to improve these results, reducing the risk related to excessive radiation exposure for both surgical staff and patients in order to minimize health related issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Urology
Asian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信