通过更新发生嫌疑的理由,改善嫌疑犯的诉讼地位

Olga S. Polikarpova
{"title":"通过更新发生嫌疑的理由,改善嫌疑犯的诉讼地位","authors":"Olga S. Polikarpova","doi":"10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article analyzes the formation and development of the grounds for introducing a specific person into the status of a suspect. The arguments of the processualists regarding the grounds for its occurrence provided for by the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, recognized by both the majority of scientists and the author as rather controversial, creating difficulties in law enforcement, are investigated. Attention is focused on the importance of modernizing the grounds for introducing a person into a procedural status that generates personalized criminal prosecution, due to the need to improve the institution of suspicion in modern criminal proceedings. The author uses a historical method to identify the moment of formation and track the development of the grounds for the emergence of the procedural status of a suspect in criminal proceedings of the Soviet and modern periods. It is stated that it is necessary to reduce the grounds for the appearance of the procedural figure of the suspect to a single one, unifying it for all forms of preliminary investigation, implementing the exemption of the decision to introduce a person into the status under investigation from correlation with coercive measures, due to the primacy of suspicion. A special contribution of the author is linking the importance of the priority of suspicion over coercive measures with the complication of the proof process due to the improvement of crime, as well as the number of crimes that oblige their investigation in a form that entails the impossibility of applying a notification of suspicion as a basis that meets the requirements of the priority of suspicion. The novelty of the study consists in a proposal entailing an increase in the procedural significance of the suspect and bringing the provisions of the criminal procedure law in line with modern trends.\n","PeriodicalId":504347,"journal":{"name":"Юридические исследования","volume":"1100 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the procedural status of a suspect by modernizing the grounds for its occurrence\",\"authors\":\"Olga S. Polikarpova\",\"doi\":\"10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The article analyzes the formation and development of the grounds for introducing a specific person into the status of a suspect. The arguments of the processualists regarding the grounds for its occurrence provided for by the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, recognized by both the majority of scientists and the author as rather controversial, creating difficulties in law enforcement, are investigated. Attention is focused on the importance of modernizing the grounds for introducing a person into a procedural status that generates personalized criminal prosecution, due to the need to improve the institution of suspicion in modern criminal proceedings. The author uses a historical method to identify the moment of formation and track the development of the grounds for the emergence of the procedural status of a suspect in criminal proceedings of the Soviet and modern periods. It is stated that it is necessary to reduce the grounds for the appearance of the procedural figure of the suspect to a single one, unifying it for all forms of preliminary investigation, implementing the exemption of the decision to introduce a person into the status under investigation from correlation with coercive measures, due to the primacy of suspicion. A special contribution of the author is linking the importance of the priority of suspicion over coercive measures with the complication of the proof process due to the improvement of crime, as well as the number of crimes that oblige their investigation in a form that entails the impossibility of applying a notification of suspicion as a basis that meets the requirements of the priority of suspicion. The novelty of the study consists in a proposal entailing an increase in the procedural significance of the suspect and bringing the provisions of the criminal procedure law in line with modern trends.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":504347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Юридические исследования\",\"volume\":\"1100 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Юридические исследования\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Юридические исследования","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了将特定人员列为嫌疑人的理由的形成和发展。文章研究了程序论者就现行《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法典》规定的发生理由提出的论点,大多数科学家和作者都认为这些论点颇具争议,给执法工作造成了困难。由于有必要改进现代刑事诉讼中的嫌疑制度,因此重点关注了将某人引入产生个性化刑事起诉的诉讼地位的 理由现代化的重要性。作者采用历史方法确定了苏联和现代刑事诉讼中嫌疑人诉讼地位形成的时间,并追踪了其发展的依据。作者指出,有必要将嫌疑人诉讼地位出现的理由简化为单一理由,将其统一用于所有形式的初步调查,由于怀疑的首要性,将某人引入调查地位的决定与强制措施无关。作者的一个特别贡献是将怀疑优先于强制措施的重要性与因犯罪率提高而导致的举证过程复杂化,以及必须以不可能适用怀疑通知作为符合怀疑优先要求的依据的形式进行调查的犯罪数量联系起来。本研究的新颖之处在于提出了一项建议,即提高嫌疑人的程序重要性,使刑事诉讼法的规定符合现代趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the procedural status of a suspect by modernizing the grounds for its occurrence
The article analyzes the formation and development of the grounds for introducing a specific person into the status of a suspect. The arguments of the processualists regarding the grounds for its occurrence provided for by the current Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, recognized by both the majority of scientists and the author as rather controversial, creating difficulties in law enforcement, are investigated. Attention is focused on the importance of modernizing the grounds for introducing a person into a procedural status that generates personalized criminal prosecution, due to the need to improve the institution of suspicion in modern criminal proceedings. The author uses a historical method to identify the moment of formation and track the development of the grounds for the emergence of the procedural status of a suspect in criminal proceedings of the Soviet and modern periods. It is stated that it is necessary to reduce the grounds for the appearance of the procedural figure of the suspect to a single one, unifying it for all forms of preliminary investigation, implementing the exemption of the decision to introduce a person into the status under investigation from correlation with coercive measures, due to the primacy of suspicion. A special contribution of the author is linking the importance of the priority of suspicion over coercive measures with the complication of the proof process due to the improvement of crime, as well as the number of crimes that oblige their investigation in a form that entails the impossibility of applying a notification of suspicion as a basis that meets the requirements of the priority of suspicion. The novelty of the study consists in a proposal entailing an increase in the procedural significance of the suspect and bringing the provisions of the criminal procedure law in line with modern trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信