提高在线职业教育的转化率和线索评分

Wen Yang Yim, K. W. Khaw, Shiuh Tong Lim, Xinying Chew
{"title":"提高在线职业教育的转化率和线索评分","authors":"Wen Yang Yim, K. W. Khaw, Shiuh Tong Lim, Xinying Chew","doi":"10.33093/ijomfa.2024.5.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to enhance lead conversion for online professional education providers by using supervised machine learning algorithms for lead conversion targeting and lead scoring, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forst, Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking. A lead dataset was used to train and test the machine-learning models. The Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) is used to establish a precise lead profile. The performance of the trained lead conversion models was evaluated and compared using the 10-Folds cross-validation method based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results show that Stacking is the best model with an accuracy of 0.9233, precision of 0.9391, and F1-score of 0.8939. Meanwhile, the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model demonstrated promising potential for automating lead scoring. The results of the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model achieved an accuracy of 0.9019, recall of 0.9019, precision of 0.9015, and F1-score of 0.9014. The optimal lead scoring threshold is 0.20, which stroked the optimal trade-off balance between accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.","PeriodicalId":303842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting","volume":"784 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Conversions and Lead Scoring in Online Professional Education\",\"authors\":\"Wen Yang Yim, K. W. Khaw, Shiuh Tong Lim, Xinying Chew\",\"doi\":\"10.33093/ijomfa.2024.5.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study seeks to enhance lead conversion for online professional education providers by using supervised machine learning algorithms for lead conversion targeting and lead scoring, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forst, Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking. A lead dataset was used to train and test the machine-learning models. The Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) is used to establish a precise lead profile. The performance of the trained lead conversion models was evaluated and compared using the 10-Folds cross-validation method based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results show that Stacking is the best model with an accuracy of 0.9233, precision of 0.9391, and F1-score of 0.8939. Meanwhile, the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model demonstrated promising potential for automating lead scoring. The results of the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model achieved an accuracy of 0.9019, recall of 0.9019, precision of 0.9015, and F1-score of 0.9014. The optimal lead scoring threshold is 0.20, which stroked the optimal trade-off balance between accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting\",\"volume\":\"784 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2024.5.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33093/ijomfa.2024.5.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过使用有监督的机器学习算法(包括逻辑回归、K-近邻、支持向量机、奈夫贝叶斯、Random Forst、Bagging、Boosting 和 Stacking)来进行潜在客户转化定位和潜在客户评分,从而提高在线职业教育提供商的潜在客户转化率。我们使用线索数据集来训练和测试机器学习模型。递归特征消除(RFE)用于建立精确的线索档案。根据准确率、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数,使用 10 折交叉验证法对训练好的线索转换模型的性能进行了评估和比较。结果显示,Stacking 是最佳模型,准确率为 0.9233,精确率为 0.9391,F1 分数为 0.8939。同时,基于逻辑回归的线索评分模型在自动线索评分方面也表现出了巨大的潜力。基于逻辑回归的线索评分模型的准确率为 0.9019,召回率为 0.9019,精确度为 0.9015,F1 分数为 0.9014。最佳导联评分阈值为 0.20,在准确率、灵敏度和特异性之间取得了最佳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Conversions and Lead Scoring in Online Professional Education
This study seeks to enhance lead conversion for online professional education providers by using supervised machine learning algorithms for lead conversion targeting and lead scoring, including Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machines, Naïve Bayes, Random Forst, Bagging, Boosting, and Stacking. A lead dataset was used to train and test the machine-learning models. The Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) is used to establish a precise lead profile. The performance of the trained lead conversion models was evaluated and compared using the 10-Folds cross-validation method based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results show that Stacking is the best model with an accuracy of 0.9233, precision of 0.9391, and F1-score of 0.8939. Meanwhile, the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model demonstrated promising potential for automating lead scoring. The results of the Logistic Regression-based lead scoring model achieved an accuracy of 0.9019, recall of 0.9019, precision of 0.9015, and F1-score of 0.9014. The optimal lead scoring threshold is 0.20, which stroked the optimal trade-off balance between accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信