教科书内容分析

Zuzana Babulicova
{"title":"教科书内容分析","authors":"Zuzana Babulicova","doi":"10.18355/pg.2024.13.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the results of the content analysis of the teaching text. We analyzed two text samples selected from textbooks - \"Biology 1 for grammar schools\" (textbook 2) and \"Biology for the 2nd year of grammar schools and the 6th year of grammar schools with an eight-year study\" (textbook 1). Both of these textbooks are used in teaching subject Biology in Slovakia. When analyzing both teaching texts, we tried to find out whether the texts, in terms of content complexity, are processed appropriately for the 1st grade students at the gymnasium. As part of the content analysis, we focused on syntactic difficulty (Ts) and conceptual difficulty (Tp) and overall difficulty (T), for which we used the T measure (the innovative Nestlerová – Průcha – Pluskal measure). This measure was modified for the analysis of not only Czech, but also Slovak textbooks. Based on this measure, we came to the conclusion that textbook 1 is processed more demandingly and its degree of difficulty reached the value of 55.28 compared to textbook 2, which degree of difficulty reached the value of 52.10. In addition to the statistical difficulty of the text of both textbooks, we tried to analyze the text in terms of the occupation of individual topics, the basic and supplementary text and the overall visual and graphic processing of the textbooks.","PeriodicalId":34591,"journal":{"name":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","volume":"90 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TEXTBOOKS\",\"authors\":\"Zuzana Babulicova\",\"doi\":\"10.18355/pg.2024.13.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents the results of the content analysis of the teaching text. We analyzed two text samples selected from textbooks - \\\"Biology 1 for grammar schools\\\" (textbook 2) and \\\"Biology for the 2nd year of grammar schools and the 6th year of grammar schools with an eight-year study\\\" (textbook 1). Both of these textbooks are used in teaching subject Biology in Slovakia. When analyzing both teaching texts, we tried to find out whether the texts, in terms of content complexity, are processed appropriately for the 1st grade students at the gymnasium. As part of the content analysis, we focused on syntactic difficulty (Ts) and conceptual difficulty (Tp) and overall difficulty (T), for which we used the T measure (the innovative Nestlerová – Průcha – Pluskal measure). This measure was modified for the analysis of not only Czech, but also Slovak textbooks. Based on this measure, we came to the conclusion that textbook 1 is processed more demandingly and its degree of difficulty reached the value of 55.28 compared to textbook 2, which degree of difficulty reached the value of 52.10. In addition to the statistical difficulty of the text of both textbooks, we tried to analyze the text in terms of the occupation of individual topics, the basic and supplementary text and the overall visual and graphic processing of the textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18355/pg.2024.13.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/pg.2024.13.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了教学课文内容分析的结果。我们分析了从教科书中选取的两个课文样本--《文法学校生物 1》(教科书 2)和《文法学校二年级和文法学校六年级八年制学习生物》(教科书 1)。这两本教科书均用于斯洛伐克的生物学科教学。在分析这两本教科书时,我们试图找出这两本教科书在内容复杂程度上是否适合体育学校一年级的学生。作为内容分析的一部分,我们重点分析了句法难度(Ts)、概念难度(Tp)和总体难度(T),为此我们使用了 T 测量法(创新的 Nestlerová - Průcha - Pluskal 测量法)。为了不仅分析捷克语教科书,也分析斯洛伐克语教科书,我们对这一指标进行了修改。根据这一衡量标准,我们得出结论:教科书 1 的加工要求更高,其难度值达到 55.28,而教科书 2 的难度值为 52.10。除了统计两本教科书的课文难度外,我们还尝试从单个主题的占用、基本课文和补充课文以及教科书整体的直观和图形处理等方面对课文进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TEXTBOOKS
The paper presents the results of the content analysis of the teaching text. We analyzed two text samples selected from textbooks - "Biology 1 for grammar schools" (textbook 2) and "Biology for the 2nd year of grammar schools and the 6th year of grammar schools with an eight-year study" (textbook 1). Both of these textbooks are used in teaching subject Biology in Slovakia. When analyzing both teaching texts, we tried to find out whether the texts, in terms of content complexity, are processed appropriately for the 1st grade students at the gymnasium. As part of the content analysis, we focused on syntactic difficulty (Ts) and conceptual difficulty (Tp) and overall difficulty (T), for which we used the T measure (the innovative Nestlerová – Průcha – Pluskal measure). This measure was modified for the analysis of not only Czech, but also Slovak textbooks. Based on this measure, we came to the conclusion that textbook 1 is processed more demandingly and its degree of difficulty reached the value of 55.28 compared to textbook 2, which degree of difficulty reached the value of 52.10. In addition to the statistical difficulty of the text of both textbooks, we tried to analyze the text in terms of the occupation of individual topics, the basic and supplementary text and the overall visual and graphic processing of the textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信