经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术的技术描述和结果。本中心的经验

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY
Omar A. Araji-Tiliani , José M. Barquero-Aroca , Rafael Hidalgo-Urbano , Román Calvo-Jambrina
{"title":"经颈动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术的技术描述和结果。本中心的经验","authors":"Omar A. Araji-Tiliani ,&nbsp;José M. Barquero-Aroca ,&nbsp;Rafael Hidalgo-Urbano ,&nbsp;Román Calvo-Jambrina","doi":"10.1016/j.circv.2024.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is the first-line technique in patients older than 75<!--> <!-->years. The transfemoral access is the more frequently used, but 15% to 20% of patients have severe peripheral vascular disease, which precludes its use. As an alternative, the axillary route is used and recently the carotid route.</div><div>In this paper we present our experience, describe our technique, and report our results with a follow up of 40 months maximum and mean (8,32<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10,12 months).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>25 patients were operated on during this interval (January 2020-June 2023), 84% men, age 78.88<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.3, 100% hypertensive and with significant peripheral arterial disease, STS score 4.46<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.87, 80% dyslipidemic, 60% NYHA<!--> <!-->III-IV, 44% chronic renal failure, 80% chronic ischemic heart disease, 28% previous stroke, COPD 48%, 16% patent left internal mammary bypass, and 24% of previous cardiac surgery. The prostheses used were Sapien<!--> <!-->3 (36%), Portico-Navitor (60%) and Accurate Neo (4%).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mortality at 30 days 4%, at one year 9%, AVC 4%, AMI 4%. Implant success 100%, pacemaker implantation 12%. We did not obtain CRF exacerbation, major or minor bleeding, perforation of LV or pericardial effusion, malpositioning or implantation of more than one prosthesis, or coronary obstruction. More than mild periprosthetic insufficiency was 4%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transcarotid transcatheter implantation is feasible, with good results, to take into account its use when the femoral and axillary accesses are not suitable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":42671,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 190-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descripción técnica y resultados del implante transcatéter valvular aórtico transcarotídeo. Experiencia de nuestro centro\",\"authors\":\"Omar A. Araji-Tiliani ,&nbsp;José M. Barquero-Aroca ,&nbsp;Rafael Hidalgo-Urbano ,&nbsp;Román Calvo-Jambrina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.circv.2024.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is the first-line technique in patients older than 75<!--> <!-->years. The transfemoral access is the more frequently used, but 15% to 20% of patients have severe peripheral vascular disease, which precludes its use. As an alternative, the axillary route is used and recently the carotid route.</div><div>In this paper we present our experience, describe our technique, and report our results with a follow up of 40 months maximum and mean (8,32<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10,12 months).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>25 patients were operated on during this interval (January 2020-June 2023), 84% men, age 78.88<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.3, 100% hypertensive and with significant peripheral arterial disease, STS score 4.46<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.87, 80% dyslipidemic, 60% NYHA<!--> <!-->III-IV, 44% chronic renal failure, 80% chronic ischemic heart disease, 28% previous stroke, COPD 48%, 16% patent left internal mammary bypass, and 24% of previous cardiac surgery. The prostheses used were Sapien<!--> <!-->3 (36%), Portico-Navitor (60%) and Accurate Neo (4%).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mortality at 30 days 4%, at one year 9%, AVC 4%, AMI 4%. Implant success 100%, pacemaker implantation 12%. We did not obtain CRF exacerbation, major or minor bleeding, perforation of LV or pericardial effusion, malpositioning or implantation of more than one prosthesis, or coronary obstruction. More than mild periprosthetic insufficiency was 4%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The transcarotid transcatheter implantation is feasible, with good results, to take into account its use when the femoral and axillary accesses are not suitable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Cardiovascular\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 190-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Cardiovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134009624000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术是75岁以上患者的一线技术。经股通道是更常用的,但15%至20%的患者有严重的外周血管疾病,因此无法使用。作为一种选择,腋窝路线和最近的颈动脉路线被使用。在本文中,我们介绍了我们的经验,描述了我们的技术,并报告了我们的结果,随访时间最长为40个月,平均为(8,32±10,12个月)。材料与方法在此期间(2020年1月- 2023年6月)手术25例患者,84%为男性,年龄78.88±6.3岁,100%为高血压并伴有明显外周动脉疾病,STS评分4.46±0.87,80%为血脂异常,60%为NYHA III-IV, 44%为慢性肾功能衰竭,80%为慢性缺血性心脏病,28%为既往卒中,COPD 48%, 16%为左侧乳房内搭桥,24%为既往心脏手术。使用的假体分别为Sapien 3(36%)、Portico-Navitor(60%)和Accurate Neo(4%)。结果30天死亡率为4%,1年死亡率为9%,AVC死亡率为4%,AMI死亡率为4%。植入成功率100%,起搏器植入12%。我们没有发现慢性肾功能衰竭加重、大出血或小出血、左室穿孔或心包积液、假体定位错误或植入多个假体或冠状动脉阻塞。超过轻度假体周围功能不全的占4%。结论经颈动脉经导管植入术是可行的,效果良好,但在股、腋通道不适宜时应考虑其使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Descripción técnica y resultados del implante transcatéter valvular aórtico transcarotídeo. Experiencia de nuestro centro

Introduction

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is the first-line technique in patients older than 75 years. The transfemoral access is the more frequently used, but 15% to 20% of patients have severe peripheral vascular disease, which precludes its use. As an alternative, the axillary route is used and recently the carotid route.
In this paper we present our experience, describe our technique, and report our results with a follow up of 40 months maximum and mean (8,32 ± 10,12 months).

Material and methods

25 patients were operated on during this interval (January 2020-June 2023), 84% men, age 78.88 ± 6.3, 100% hypertensive and with significant peripheral arterial disease, STS score 4.46 ± 0.87, 80% dyslipidemic, 60% NYHA III-IV, 44% chronic renal failure, 80% chronic ischemic heart disease, 28% previous stroke, COPD 48%, 16% patent left internal mammary bypass, and 24% of previous cardiac surgery. The prostheses used were Sapien 3 (36%), Portico-Navitor (60%) and Accurate Neo (4%).

Results

Mortality at 30 days 4%, at one year 9%, AVC 4%, AMI 4%. Implant success 100%, pacemaker implantation 12%. We did not obtain CRF exacerbation, major or minor bleeding, perforation of LV or pericardial effusion, malpositioning or implantation of more than one prosthesis, or coronary obstruction. More than mild periprosthetic insufficiency was 4%.

Conclusions

The transcarotid transcatheter implantation is feasible, with good results, to take into account its use when the femoral and axillary accesses are not suitable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
109
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信