对接受卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)周期的不良反应患者实施短效激动剂停止卵巢刺激方案的效果评估

Ahmed Fathy, Yahya Edris, Heba Abdel Razik
{"title":"对接受卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(ICSI)周期的不良反应患者实施短效激动剂停止卵巢刺激方案的效果评估","authors":"Ahmed Fathy, Yahya Edris, Heba Abdel Razik","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259962.1287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poor ovarian response is defined as the collection of three or fewer oocytes in two prior ovarian stimulation cycles, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle from a woman who is over 40 years of age, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle and an abnormal ovarian reserve test. We aimed to determine if in poor responders’ patients, the SAS stimulation protocol allows for a better number of oocytes, mature oocytes, total embryos at D2 and usable embryos in comparison with the last previous IVF attempt within the same patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on 56 women aged ≥ 18 and < 43 years who undergo an IVF protocol with the “short agonist stop” (SAS) protocol compared with the same patients’ previous performance in their last IVF attempt. Enrolled patients were treated in two consecutive cycles. The first attempt was achieved with a standard protocol. Patients for whom the standard protocol has failed were treated in the subsequent cycle with the SAS protocol. Results: Regarding the cumulative outcomes, ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in SAS protocol compared to IVF protocol (0% vs. 12.5%, P=0.026 ). Number of cumulative ET, cancellation before oocyte pick, no usable embryo, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rate were insignificantly different between both protocols. Conclusion : The SAS stimulation protocol may offer promising results for poor responders with low prognosis and previous failed IVF.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"37 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of The Results of Short Agonist Stop Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing ICSI Cycles\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Fathy, Yahya Edris, Heba Abdel Razik\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259962.1287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Poor ovarian response is defined as the collection of three or fewer oocytes in two prior ovarian stimulation cycles, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle from a woman who is over 40 years of age, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle and an abnormal ovarian reserve test. We aimed to determine if in poor responders’ patients, the SAS stimulation protocol allows for a better number of oocytes, mature oocytes, total embryos at D2 and usable embryos in comparison with the last previous IVF attempt within the same patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on 56 women aged ≥ 18 and < 43 years who undergo an IVF protocol with the “short agonist stop” (SAS) protocol compared with the same patients’ previous performance in their last IVF attempt. Enrolled patients were treated in two consecutive cycles. The first attempt was achieved with a standard protocol. Patients for whom the standard protocol has failed were treated in the subsequent cycle with the SAS protocol. Results: Regarding the cumulative outcomes, ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in SAS protocol compared to IVF protocol (0% vs. 12.5%, P=0.026 ). Number of cumulative ET, cancellation before oocyte pick, no usable embryo, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rate were insignificantly different between both protocols. Conclusion : The SAS stimulation protocol may offer promising results for poor responders with low prognosis and previous failed IVF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259962.1287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2024.259962.1287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卵巢反应不佳的定义是:在之前的两个卵巢刺激周期中收集到的卵母细胞数量少于或等于 3 个,或在 40 岁以上女性的单个刺激周期中收集到的卵母细胞数量少于或等于 3 个,或在单个刺激周期中收集到的卵母细胞数量少于或等于 3 个,且卵巢储备功能检测异常。我们的目的是确定,在反应不佳的患者中,与上次试管婴儿尝试相比,SAS 刺激方案是否能使卵母细胞数量、成熟卵母细胞数量、D2 期胚胎总数和可用胚胎数量增加。材料与方法:我们对 56 名年龄≥ 18 岁且小于 43 岁的女性进行了前瞻性观察研究,她们接受了 "短效激动剂停药"(SAS)方案的体外受精方案,并与同一患者上次尝试体外受精时的表现进行了比较。入选患者接受了两个连续周期的治疗。第一次尝试采用标准方案。标准方案失败的患者在随后的周期中使用 SAS 方案进行治疗。治疗结果在累积结果方面,SAS方案的持续妊娠率明显高于IVF方案(0% vs. 12.5%,P=0.026)。两种方案的累计ET次数、取卵前取消、无可用胚胎、生化妊娠和流产率差异不大。结论:SAS促排方案可为预后较差、既往试管婴儿失败的患者提供良好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of The Results of Short Agonist Stop Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responder Patients Undergoing ICSI Cycles
Background: Poor ovarian response is defined as the collection of three or fewer oocytes in two prior ovarian stimulation cycles, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle from a woman who is over 40 years of age, or collection of three or fewer oocytes in a single stimulation cycle and an abnormal ovarian reserve test. We aimed to determine if in poor responders’ patients, the SAS stimulation protocol allows for a better number of oocytes, mature oocytes, total embryos at D2 and usable embryos in comparison with the last previous IVF attempt within the same patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on 56 women aged ≥ 18 and < 43 years who undergo an IVF protocol with the “short agonist stop” (SAS) protocol compared with the same patients’ previous performance in their last IVF attempt. Enrolled patients were treated in two consecutive cycles. The first attempt was achieved with a standard protocol. Patients for whom the standard protocol has failed were treated in the subsequent cycle with the SAS protocol. Results: Regarding the cumulative outcomes, ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in SAS protocol compared to IVF protocol (0% vs. 12.5%, P=0.026 ). Number of cumulative ET, cancellation before oocyte pick, no usable embryo, biochemical pregnancy, and miscarriage rate were insignificantly different between both protocols. Conclusion : The SAS stimulation protocol may offer promising results for poor responders with low prognosis and previous failed IVF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信