雅加达、泗水和三宝垄地区公共会计师事务所的审计师经验和审计质量对审计师绩效的影响,职业道德是调节变量

Zakkiandri, Karsam
{"title":"雅加达、泗水和三宝垄地区公共会计师事务所的审计师经验和审计质量对审计师绩效的影响,职业道德是调节变量","authors":"Zakkiandri, Karsam","doi":"10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research identifies and determines the relationship between Auditor Experience, Audit Quality, and Auditor Performance in Public Accounting Firms in DKI Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang. Professional Ethics acts as a moderating variable. Quantitative method with a sample of 12 Public Accounting Firms (300 respondents) using purposive sampling. Data analysis uses Multivariate Structural Equation Model (SEM) SmartPLS 3 with a focus on outer model and inner model analysis. The results of this study show that partially, auditor experience has a significant effect on auditor performance (P = 0.000 < 0.05), while audit quality has no significant effect (P = 0.311 > 0.05). Professional ethics as a moderating variable influences audit performance (P = 0.024 < 0.05). However, auditor experience which is moderated by professional ethics, and audit quality which is moderated by professional ethics do not have a significant effect (P = 0.824 and P = 0.242 < 0.05). Simultaneously, auditor performance is influenced by auditor experience and audit quality by 90% (R2 = 0.901).","PeriodicalId":506437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Society","volume":"107 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditor Experience and Audit Quality on Auditor Performance with Professional Ethics as a Moderating Variable in Public Accounting Firms in DKI Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang\",\"authors\":\"Zakkiandri, Karsam\",\"doi\":\"10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research identifies and determines the relationship between Auditor Experience, Audit Quality, and Auditor Performance in Public Accounting Firms in DKI Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang. Professional Ethics acts as a moderating variable. Quantitative method with a sample of 12 Public Accounting Firms (300 respondents) using purposive sampling. Data analysis uses Multivariate Structural Equation Model (SEM) SmartPLS 3 with a focus on outer model and inner model analysis. The results of this study show that partially, auditor experience has a significant effect on auditor performance (P = 0.000 < 0.05), while audit quality has no significant effect (P = 0.311 > 0.05). Professional ethics as a moderating variable influences audit performance (P = 0.024 < 0.05). However, auditor experience which is moderated by professional ethics, and audit quality which is moderated by professional ethics do not have a significant effect (P = 0.824 and P = 0.242 < 0.05). Simultaneously, auditor performance is influenced by auditor experience and audit quality by 90% (R2 = 0.901).\",\"PeriodicalId\":506437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science and Society\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究识别并确定了雅加达、泗水和三宝垄地区公共会计师事务所的审计师经验、审计质量和审计师绩效之间的关系。职业道德是一个调节变量。采用定量方法,以 12 家公共会计师事务所(300 名受访者)为样本,使用目的性抽样。数据分析采用多元结构方程模型(SEM)SmartPLS 3,重点是外部模型和内部模型分析。研究结果表明,审计师经验对审计师绩效有显著影响(P = 0.000 < 0.05),而审计质量对审计师绩效无显著影响(P = 0.311 > 0.05)。职业道德是影响审计绩效的调节变量(P = 0.024 < 0.05)。然而,受职业道德调节的审计师经验和受职业道德调节的审计质量并没有显著影响(P = 0.824 和 P = 0.242 < 0.05)。同时,审计师绩效受审计师经验和审计质量的影响达 90%(R2 = 0.901)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditor Experience and Audit Quality on Auditor Performance with Professional Ethics as a Moderating Variable in Public Accounting Firms in DKI Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang
This research identifies and determines the relationship between Auditor Experience, Audit Quality, and Auditor Performance in Public Accounting Firms in DKI Jakarta, Surabaya, and Semarang. Professional Ethics acts as a moderating variable. Quantitative method with a sample of 12 Public Accounting Firms (300 respondents) using purposive sampling. Data analysis uses Multivariate Structural Equation Model (SEM) SmartPLS 3 with a focus on outer model and inner model analysis. The results of this study show that partially, auditor experience has a significant effect on auditor performance (P = 0.000 < 0.05), while audit quality has no significant effect (P = 0.311 > 0.05). Professional ethics as a moderating variable influences audit performance (P = 0.024 < 0.05). However, auditor experience which is moderated by professional ethics, and audit quality which is moderated by professional ethics do not have a significant effect (P = 0.824 and P = 0.242 < 0.05). Simultaneously, auditor performance is influenced by auditor experience and audit quality by 90% (R2 = 0.901).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信