{"title":"学校外部评估反馈和学校自我评估:提供哪些反馈?","authors":"Carla Fi̇guei̇redo","doi":"10.30828/real.1300512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns with educational quality have led to the implementation of external school evaluation (ESE), based on the premise that these processes can provide valuable information about schools and, consequently, create conditions for improvement. Improvement is based on the feedback, commonly in the form of an evaluation report, resulting from evaluations, describing the reality of each school and providing clues and guidance for action and progress. Nonetheless, ESE still has a relatively weak impact on overall school improvement. With this in mind, this paper focuses on the potential of evaluation reports to promote improvement, aiming to answer the question: What kind of feedback on school self-evaluation (SSE) does ESE provide to schools? Focusing on the Portuguese case, the paper analyses the feedback regarding school self-evaluation provided in evaluation reports from the northern region of Portugal. The study concludes that the feedback provided in the reports is mainly descriptive and generic, referencing issues that apply to all schools rather than targeting issues specific to each school. This leads to the hypothesis that the vagueness of ESE feedback can explain the limited contribution external evaluations make towards SSE improvement in particular, and school improvement overall. The example of Portugal and self-evaluation can help bring to light where ESE processes are underperforming and require investment to achieve their goals.","PeriodicalId":109382,"journal":{"name":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","volume":"242 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External School Evaluation Feedback and School Self-Evaluation: What Feedback is Provided?\",\"authors\":\"Carla Fi̇guei̇redo\",\"doi\":\"10.30828/real.1300512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concerns with educational quality have led to the implementation of external school evaluation (ESE), based on the premise that these processes can provide valuable information about schools and, consequently, create conditions for improvement. Improvement is based on the feedback, commonly in the form of an evaluation report, resulting from evaluations, describing the reality of each school and providing clues and guidance for action and progress. Nonetheless, ESE still has a relatively weak impact on overall school improvement. With this in mind, this paper focuses on the potential of evaluation reports to promote improvement, aiming to answer the question: What kind of feedback on school self-evaluation (SSE) does ESE provide to schools? Focusing on the Portuguese case, the paper analyses the feedback regarding school self-evaluation provided in evaluation reports from the northern region of Portugal. The study concludes that the feedback provided in the reports is mainly descriptive and generic, referencing issues that apply to all schools rather than targeting issues specific to each school. This leads to the hypothesis that the vagueness of ESE feedback can explain the limited contribution external evaluations make towards SSE improvement in particular, and school improvement overall. The example of Portugal and self-evaluation can help bring to light where ESE processes are underperforming and require investment to achieve their goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1300512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1300512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对教育质量的关注导致了外部学校评估(ESE)的实施,其前提是这些过程可以提供 有关学校的宝贵信息,从而为改进创造条件。改进的基础是评估所产生的反馈,通常以评估报告的形式出现,描述每所学校的实际 情况,为采取行动和取得进展提供线索和指导。尽管如此,ESE 对学校整体改进的影响仍然相对较弱。有鉴于此,本文着重探讨评估报告在促进学校改进方面的潜力,旨在回答以下问题:ESE 为学校提供了什么样的自我评估反馈?本文以葡萄牙为例,分析了葡萄牙北部地区评估报告中提供的有关学校自评的反馈。研究得出的结论是,报告中提供的反馈主要是描述性和一般性的,提到了适用于所 有学校的问题,而不是针对每所学校的具体问题。这就提出了一个假设,即外部评价反馈的模糊性可以解释外部评价对自 我评价的改进,特别是对学校整体改进的有限贡献。葡萄牙和自我评估的例子有助于揭示 ESE 过程中哪些地方表现不佳,需要进行投资以实现其目标。
External School Evaluation Feedback and School Self-Evaluation: What Feedback is Provided?
Concerns with educational quality have led to the implementation of external school evaluation (ESE), based on the premise that these processes can provide valuable information about schools and, consequently, create conditions for improvement. Improvement is based on the feedback, commonly in the form of an evaluation report, resulting from evaluations, describing the reality of each school and providing clues and guidance for action and progress. Nonetheless, ESE still has a relatively weak impact on overall school improvement. With this in mind, this paper focuses on the potential of evaluation reports to promote improvement, aiming to answer the question: What kind of feedback on school self-evaluation (SSE) does ESE provide to schools? Focusing on the Portuguese case, the paper analyses the feedback regarding school self-evaluation provided in evaluation reports from the northern region of Portugal. The study concludes that the feedback provided in the reports is mainly descriptive and generic, referencing issues that apply to all schools rather than targeting issues specific to each school. This leads to the hypothesis that the vagueness of ESE feedback can explain the limited contribution external evaluations make towards SSE improvement in particular, and school improvement overall. The example of Portugal and self-evaluation can help bring to light where ESE processes are underperforming and require investment to achieve their goals.