使用以人为本的结构在咨询和临床笔记中进行规划

Werdie van Staden
{"title":"使用以人为本的结构在咨询和临床笔记中进行规划","authors":"Werdie van Staden","doi":"10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The concluding part of a clinical consultation and its recording in clinical notes typically comprises the ‘plan’ or ‘further management’, which guides further actions regarding tests and investigations, treatments, counselling, referrals and follow-up.\nObjective: The objective of this article is to consider how this part of the consultation and clinical notes may be structured in an explicitly person-centered way, more so than merely in a patient-centered way.\nMethods: The tenets of Person centered Medicine are applied to the standard objectives of the planning section of the clinical consultation. Using an informal case study, this application is contrasted with applying too narrow an understanding of Person centered Medicine as if the same as patient-centered medicine.\nResults: The planning section is conventionally structured in biopsychosocial domains, but it is typically formulated as the clinician’s plan and is rather unilateral in presenting the clinician’s perspective. Although at times implicitly incorporating the patient’s contributions, the patient’s voice does not routinely feature explicitly in the plan or the patient is merely required to understand, commit and adhere to the plan. In contrast, the planning section may be structured explicitly in a person-centered way and reflect co-production and shared decision-making. This may be achieved by deliberately adding the headings ‘co-produced’ and ‘co-decided’ and by requiring that the entire plan be informed by not only medical/health expertise but crucially by that which matters to the patient in that individual’s context (including concerns, expectations, values, preferences, aspirations and strengths).\nConclusion: Clinicians and medical educators should optimize ‘the plan’ section of the consultation and the clinical notes by which to foster a routine that is more person-centered and that lives up to the requirements of shared decision-making and co-production.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning in the Consultation and Clinical Notes Using a Person-Centered Structure\",\"authors\":\"Werdie van Staden\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The concluding part of a clinical consultation and its recording in clinical notes typically comprises the ‘plan’ or ‘further management’, which guides further actions regarding tests and investigations, treatments, counselling, referrals and follow-up.\\nObjective: The objective of this article is to consider how this part of the consultation and clinical notes may be structured in an explicitly person-centered way, more so than merely in a patient-centered way.\\nMethods: The tenets of Person centered Medicine are applied to the standard objectives of the planning section of the clinical consultation. Using an informal case study, this application is contrasted with applying too narrow an understanding of Person centered Medicine as if the same as patient-centered medicine.\\nResults: The planning section is conventionally structured in biopsychosocial domains, but it is typically formulated as the clinician’s plan and is rather unilateral in presenting the clinician’s perspective. Although at times implicitly incorporating the patient’s contributions, the patient’s voice does not routinely feature explicitly in the plan or the patient is merely required to understand, commit and adhere to the plan. In contrast, the planning section may be structured explicitly in a person-centered way and reflect co-production and shared decision-making. This may be achieved by deliberately adding the headings ‘co-produced’ and ‘co-decided’ and by requiring that the entire plan be informed by not only medical/health expertise but crucially by that which matters to the patient in that individual’s context (including concerns, expectations, values, preferences, aspirations and strengths).\\nConclusion: Clinicians and medical educators should optimize ‘the plan’ section of the consultation and the clinical notes by which to foster a routine that is more person-centered and that lives up to the requirements of shared decision-making and co-production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"volume\":\"59 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床会诊的结束部分和临床笔记中的记录通常包括 "计划 "或 "进一步管理",它指导着有关测试和检查、治疗、咨询、转诊和随访的进一步行动:本文旨在探讨如何以明确的 "以人为本 "的方式,而不仅仅是 "以病人为本 "的方式来安排诊疗和临床记录的这一部分:方法:将 "以人为本的医学 "原则应用于临床咨询计划部分的标准目标。方法:将 "以人为中心的医学 "原则应用于临床咨询计划部分的标准目标中,并通过非正式案例研究,将这种应用与过于狭隘地理解 "以人为中心的医学 "与 "以病人为中心的医学 "进行对比:结果:传统上,计划部分是以生物-心理-社会领域为结构的,但它通常是作为临床医生的计划来制定的,而且在呈现临床医生的观点时相当片面。虽然有时会隐含地纳入病人的意见,但病人的声音通常不会明确地出现在计划中,或者只是要求病人理解、承诺和遵守计划。与此相反,计划部分可以明确采用以人为本的方式,体现共同制作和共同决策。要做到这一点,可以特意添加 "共同制定 "和 "共同决定 "的标题,并要求整个计划不仅要参考医学/健康专业知识,更重要的是要参考患者的个人情况(包括关切、期望、价值观、偏好、愿望和优势):临床医生和医学教育工作者应优化会诊和临床笔记中的 "计划 "部分,以促进日常工作更加以人为本,并达到共同决策和共同生产的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning in the Consultation and Clinical Notes Using a Person-Centered Structure
Background: The concluding part of a clinical consultation and its recording in clinical notes typically comprises the ‘plan’ or ‘further management’, which guides further actions regarding tests and investigations, treatments, counselling, referrals and follow-up. Objective: The objective of this article is to consider how this part of the consultation and clinical notes may be structured in an explicitly person-centered way, more so than merely in a patient-centered way. Methods: The tenets of Person centered Medicine are applied to the standard objectives of the planning section of the clinical consultation. Using an informal case study, this application is contrasted with applying too narrow an understanding of Person centered Medicine as if the same as patient-centered medicine. Results: The planning section is conventionally structured in biopsychosocial domains, but it is typically formulated as the clinician’s plan and is rather unilateral in presenting the clinician’s perspective. Although at times implicitly incorporating the patient’s contributions, the patient’s voice does not routinely feature explicitly in the plan or the patient is merely required to understand, commit and adhere to the plan. In contrast, the planning section may be structured explicitly in a person-centered way and reflect co-production and shared decision-making. This may be achieved by deliberately adding the headings ‘co-produced’ and ‘co-decided’ and by requiring that the entire plan be informed by not only medical/health expertise but crucially by that which matters to the patient in that individual’s context (including concerns, expectations, values, preferences, aspirations and strengths). Conclusion: Clinicians and medical educators should optimize ‘the plan’ section of the consultation and the clinical notes by which to foster a routine that is more person-centered and that lives up to the requirements of shared decision-making and co-production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信