坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆三级医院通过硬膜外类固醇注射治疗伴有根神经病变的腰骶部疼痛

Kaustubh M Chauhan
{"title":"坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆三级医院通过硬膜外类固醇注射治疗伴有根神经病变的腰骶部疼痛","authors":"Kaustubh M Chauhan","doi":"10.36106/gjra/1501286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:- The aim of this retrospective observational study was to compare the potential efcacy of\nepidural steroid injection along with other conservative measures for relieving pain and improving\nfunction in patients with lumbosacral pain with radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation. The route of administration\n(transforaminal, caudal or translaminar) were chosen on basis of pattern of radiculopathy and mri ndings of disc herniation.\nMethods:- This study included 131 patients who presented with low back pain and radiculopathy due to lumbar disc\nherniation(at levels of L4–L5 or L5–S1) diagnosed clinically and conrmed by means of MRI. 4 patients were lost to follow up\nremainig 127 patients at nal follow up.(127 patients)All patients were given fair trial of conservative treatment with drugs and\nphysiotherapy. All patients were assessed at presentation and after starting the treatment at the second week and then third\nand sixth month using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function status.\nResults:- In the transforaminal group (45 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from\nbefore the injection (ODI mean 62.4) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 24.4, P < 0.01), and upon follow-up at 3 months.\n(ODI mean 20.8, P < 0.01). 21 patients (16.5%) required 1 or 2 repeated injections, 4 (3.1%) patients underwent surgery. In the\ninterlaminar group (19 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from before the injection\n(ODI mean 60.7) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 30.1, P < 0.01), but not upon follow-up (ODI mean 43.2, P = 0.09).5\n(26.3%) patients required 1 or 2 repeated injection, 2 (10.5%) patients underwent surgery and 4(21%) patients developed\ntransient paraparesis.In caudal group(63 patients) there was statistically signicant improvement in ODI SCROES from before\nthe injection (ODI mean 39.6) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 29.6) which deteriorate at 3 months( ODI mean\n31.8).There was an insignicant difference (P > 0.05) between the transformainal and caudal groups in the VAS, except at the\nthird month (P < 0.05). Epidural steroid injection could be a preferable choice in chronic lowback and radicular Conclusion:-\npain due to LDH. It has shown good short term outcomes and can be safe, cost effective and minimally invasive treatment and\nalternative to surgery.","PeriodicalId":12664,"journal":{"name":"Global journal for research analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MANAGEMENT OF LUMBOSACRAL PAIN WITH RADICULOPATHY BY EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTION IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA\",\"authors\":\"Kaustubh M Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.36106/gjra/1501286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction:- The aim of this retrospective observational study was to compare the potential efcacy of\\nepidural steroid injection along with other conservative measures for relieving pain and improving\\nfunction in patients with lumbosacral pain with radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation. The route of administration\\n(transforaminal, caudal or translaminar) were chosen on basis of pattern of radiculopathy and mri ndings of disc herniation.\\nMethods:- This study included 131 patients who presented with low back pain and radiculopathy due to lumbar disc\\nherniation(at levels of L4–L5 or L5–S1) diagnosed clinically and conrmed by means of MRI. 4 patients were lost to follow up\\nremainig 127 patients at nal follow up.(127 patients)All patients were given fair trial of conservative treatment with drugs and\\nphysiotherapy. All patients were assessed at presentation and after starting the treatment at the second week and then third\\nand sixth month using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function status.\\nResults:- In the transforaminal group (45 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from\\nbefore the injection (ODI mean 62.4) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 24.4, P < 0.01), and upon follow-up at 3 months.\\n(ODI mean 20.8, P < 0.01). 21 patients (16.5%) required 1 or 2 repeated injections, 4 (3.1%) patients underwent surgery. In the\\ninterlaminar group (19 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from before the injection\\n(ODI mean 60.7) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 30.1, P < 0.01), but not upon follow-up (ODI mean 43.2, P = 0.09).5\\n(26.3%) patients required 1 or 2 repeated injection, 2 (10.5%) patients underwent surgery and 4(21%) patients developed\\ntransient paraparesis.In caudal group(63 patients) there was statistically signicant improvement in ODI SCROES from before\\nthe injection (ODI mean 39.6) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 29.6) which deteriorate at 3 months( ODI mean\\n31.8).There was an insignicant difference (P > 0.05) between the transformainal and caudal groups in the VAS, except at the\\nthird month (P < 0.05). Epidural steroid injection could be a preferable choice in chronic lowback and radicular Conclusion:-\\npain due to LDH. It has shown good short term outcomes and can be safe, cost effective and minimally invasive treatment and\\nalternative to surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal for research analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/1501286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal for research analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/1501286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:- 这项回顾性观察研究旨在比较硬膜外类固醇注射与其他保守措施在缓解腰椎间盘突出症引起的腰骶部疼痛并改善患者功能方面的潜在。方法:- 本研究纳入了 131 名腰椎间盘突出症(L4-L5 或 L5-S1)引起的腰背痛和根性神经病患者,这些患者经临床诊断并通过核磁共振成像。所有患者均接受了药物和物理治疗的保守治疗。所有患者均在就诊时和开始治疗后的第二周、第三和第六个月接受了评估,评估采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),前者用于评估疼痛,后者用于评估功能状况。结果:- 在经椎间孔组(45 名患者)中,从注射前(ODI 平均值为 62.4)到注射后 2 周(ODI 平均值为 24.4,P <0.01),以及 3 个月的随访(ODI 平均值为 20.8,P <0.01),ODI 评分均有显著改善。21 名患者(16.5%)需要重复注射 1 或 2 次,4 名患者(3.1%)接受了手术。在椎间孔组(19 名患者)中,从注射前(ODI 平均值为 60.7)到注射后 2 周(ODI 平均值为 30.1,P <0.01),ODI 评分均有显著改善(ODI 平均值为 43.2,P =0.09),但在随访时没有改善(ODI 平均值为 43.2,P =0.09)。5(26.3%)名患者需要重复注射 1 或 2 次,2(10.5%)名患者接受了手术,4(21%)名患者出现短暂性截瘫。在尾侧注射组(63 名患者)中,从注射前(ODI 平均值为 39.6)到注射后 2 周(ODI 平均值为 29.6),ODI SCROES 均有显著改善,但在 3 个月后(ODI 平均值为 31.8),改善程度有所减弱(P>0.05)。硬膜外类固醇注射是治疗 LDH 引起的慢性腰背痛和根性结节痛的首选方法。它具有良好的短期疗效,是一种安全、经济、微创的治疗方法,也是手术的替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MANAGEMENT OF LUMBOSACRAL PAIN WITH RADICULOPATHY BY EPIDURAL STEROID INJECTION IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA
Introduction:- The aim of this retrospective observational study was to compare the potential efcacy of epidural steroid injection along with other conservative measures for relieving pain and improving function in patients with lumbosacral pain with radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation. The route of administration (transforaminal, caudal or translaminar) were chosen on basis of pattern of radiculopathy and mri ndings of disc herniation. Methods:- This study included 131 patients who presented with low back pain and radiculopathy due to lumbar disc herniation(at levels of L4–L5 or L5–S1) diagnosed clinically and conrmed by means of MRI. 4 patients were lost to follow up remainig 127 patients at nal follow up.(127 patients)All patients were given fair trial of conservative treatment with drugs and physiotherapy. All patients were assessed at presentation and after starting the treatment at the second week and then third and sixth month using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function status. Results:- In the transforaminal group (45 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from before the injection (ODI mean 62.4) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 24.4, P < 0.01), and upon follow-up at 3 months. (ODI mean 20.8, P < 0.01). 21 patients (16.5%) required 1 or 2 repeated injections, 4 (3.1%) patients underwent surgery. In the interlaminar group (19 patients), there was a statistically signicant improvement in the ODI scores from before the injection (ODI mean 60.7) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 30.1, P < 0.01), but not upon follow-up (ODI mean 43.2, P = 0.09).5 (26.3%) patients required 1 or 2 repeated injection, 2 (10.5%) patients underwent surgery and 4(21%) patients developed transient paraparesis.In caudal group(63 patients) there was statistically signicant improvement in ODI SCROES from before the injection (ODI mean 39.6) to 2 weeks after the injection (ODI mean 29.6) which deteriorate at 3 months( ODI mean 31.8).There was an insignicant difference (P > 0.05) between the transformainal and caudal groups in the VAS, except at the third month (P < 0.05). Epidural steroid injection could be a preferable choice in chronic lowback and radicular Conclusion:- pain due to LDH. It has shown good short term outcomes and can be safe, cost effective and minimally invasive treatment and alternative to surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信