2 型糖尿病患者使用 Degludec/Insulin Aspart 与双相 Aspart 30 胰岛素的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的元分析

Yan-Li Niu, Ye Zhang, Zhi-Yong Song, Chuan-Zhi Zhao, Yun Luo, Yan Wang, Jing Yuan
{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者使用 Degludec/Insulin Aspart 与双相 Aspart 30 胰岛素的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的元分析","authors":"Yan-Li Niu, Ye Zhang, Zhi-Yong Song, Chuan-Zhi Zhao, Yun Luo, Yan Wang, Jing Yuan","doi":"10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We systematically reviewed and analyzed the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). \nMethods: We used computers to search the Embase, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library database, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 in T2D patients. The research period was from the establishment of the database to May 19, 2023. We used Review Manager 5.20 statistical software for systematic meta-analysis. \nResults: We included 8 RCTs with 2281 participants. IDegAsp was better to BIAsp30 in improving fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (P<0.001) and reducing the endpoint daily average insulin dose (P<0.01). Furthermore, compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp significantly reduced the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of body weight change (P=0.99), glycosylated hemoglobin (P=0.50), the overall risk of hypoglycemic events (P=0.57) and adverse events (P=0.89) between the two groups. \nConclusion: Compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp could significantly reduce FPG levels, insulin dosage, and the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events in T2D patients, without increasing the overall risk of adverse events.","PeriodicalId":510223,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Li Niu, Ye Zhang, Zhi-Yong Song, Chuan-Zhi Zhao, Yun Luo, Yan Wang, Jing Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We systematically reviewed and analyzed the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). \\nMethods: We used computers to search the Embase, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library database, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 in T2D patients. The research period was from the establishment of the database to May 19, 2023. We used Review Manager 5.20 statistical software for systematic meta-analysis. \\nResults: We included 8 RCTs with 2281 participants. IDegAsp was better to BIAsp30 in improving fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (P<0.001) and reducing the endpoint daily average insulin dose (P<0.01). Furthermore, compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp significantly reduced the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of body weight change (P=0.99), glycosylated hemoglobin (P=0.50), the overall risk of hypoglycemic events (P=0.57) and adverse events (P=0.89) between the two groups. \\nConclusion: Compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp could significantly reduce FPG levels, insulin dosage, and the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events in T2D patients, without increasing the overall risk of adverse events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们系统回顾并分析了德谷胰岛素/天冬胰岛素(IDegAsp)与双相天冬胰岛素 30(BIAsp 30)在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们利用计算机在 Embase、PubMed、临床试验和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行了检索,收集了关于 IDegAsp 与 BIAsp 30 治疗 T2D 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究时间为数据库建立后至 2023 年 5 月 19 日。我们使用Review Manager 5.20统计软件进行了系统荟萃分析。结果我们纳入了 8 项研究,2281 名参与者。在改善空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)水平(P<0.001)和减少终点日均胰岛素剂量(P<0.01)方面,IDegAsp优于BIAsp30。此外,与 BIAsp30 相比,IDegAsp 能显著降低夜间低血糖事件的风险(P<0.001)。然而,两组在改善体重变化(P=0.99)、糖化血红蛋白(P=0.50)、低血糖事件总体风险(P=0.57)和不良事件(P=0.89)方面没有明显差异。结论与 BIAsp30 相比,IDegAsp 可显著降低 T2D 患者的 FPG 水平、胰岛素用量和夜间低血糖事件风险,而不会增加不良事件的总体风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: We systematically reviewed and analyzed the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We used computers to search the Embase, PubMed, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library database, and collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 in T2D patients. The research period was from the establishment of the database to May 19, 2023. We used Review Manager 5.20 statistical software for systematic meta-analysis. Results: We included 8 RCTs with 2281 participants. IDegAsp was better to BIAsp30 in improving fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (P<0.001) and reducing the endpoint daily average insulin dose (P<0.01). Furthermore, compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp significantly reduced the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of body weight change (P=0.99), glycosylated hemoglobin (P=0.50), the overall risk of hypoglycemic events (P=0.57) and adverse events (P=0.89) between the two groups. Conclusion: Compared with BIAsp30, IDegAsp could significantly reduce FPG levels, insulin dosage, and the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemic events in T2D patients, without increasing the overall risk of adverse events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信