分析印度城市合作银行的全要素生产率变化：马尔奎斯特生产力方法

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Studies in Microeconomics Pub Date : 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1177/23210222241227013

Aadil Ummar Zaman, M. Zaman

{"title":"分析印度城市合作银行的全要素生产率变化：马尔奎斯特生产力方法","authors":"Aadil Ummar Zaman, M. Zaman","doi":"10.1177/23210222241227013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the total factor productivity (TFP) growth among urban cooperative banks in India during 2014–2020. The measurement of productivity is done using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. We use two different models, viz., the intermediation approach and the production approach, to see how productivity estimates vary with the change in inputs and outputs. Our results show a large asymmetry in productivity estimates both among banks and over time. TFP estimates were consistently higher under the production approach vis-à-vis the intermediation approach. Further, the empirical results show that productivity gains were mainly determined by technological progress rather than efficiency improvements. Thus, collaborations in technological know-how can be beneficial to productivity growth. JEL Classifications: G15, G21, G34","PeriodicalId":37410,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Microeconomics","volume":"24 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the Total Factor Productivity Change Among Urban Cooperative Banks in India: The Malmquist Productivity Approach\",\"authors\":\"Aadil Ummar Zaman, M. Zaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23210222241227013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the total factor productivity (TFP) growth among urban cooperative banks in India during 2014–2020. The measurement of productivity is done using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. We use two different models, viz., the intermediation approach and the production approach, to see how productivity estimates vary with the change in inputs and outputs. Our results show a large asymmetry in productivity estimates both among banks and over time. TFP estimates were consistently higher under the production approach vis-à-vis the intermediation approach. Further, the empirical results show that productivity gains were mainly determined by technological progress rather than efficiency improvements. Thus, collaborations in technological know-how can be beneficial to productivity growth. JEL Classifications: G15, G21, G34\",\"PeriodicalId\":37410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Microeconomics\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Microeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222241227013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222241227013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了 2014-2020 年间印度城市合作银行的全要素生产率（TFP）增长情况。生产率的测量采用了基于数据包络分析的马尔奎斯特生产率指数。我们使用了两种不同的模型，即中介方法和生产方法，以了解生产率估计值如何随投入和产出的变化而变化。我们的研究结果表明，银行间和不同时期的生产率估计值存在很大的不对称性。生产法与中介法相比，全要素生产率估计值一直较高。此外，实证结果表明，生产率的提高主要是由技术进步而非效率提高决定的。因此，技术诀窍方面的合作有利于生产率的提高。JEL 分类：G15, G21, G34G15、G21、G34

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Analysing the Total Factor Productivity Change Among Urban Cooperative Banks in India: The Malmquist Productivity Approach

This study investigates the total factor productivity (TFP) growth among urban cooperative banks in India during 2014–2020. The measurement of productivity is done using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. We use two different models, viz., the intermediation approach and the production approach, to see how productivity estimates vary with the change in inputs and outputs. Our results show a large asymmetry in productivity estimates both among banks and over time. TFP estimates were consistently higher under the production approach vis-à-vis the intermediation approach. Further, the empirical results show that productivity gains were mainly determined by technological progress rather than efficiency improvements. Thus, collaborations in technological know-how can be beneficial to productivity growth. JEL Classifications: G15, G21, G34

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Microeconomics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Studies in Microeconomics seeks high quality theoretical as well as applied (or empirical) research in all areas of microeconomics (broadly defined to include other avenues of decision science such as psychology, political science and organizational behavior). In particular, we encourage submissions in new areas of Microeconomics such as in the fields of Experimental economics and Behavioral Economics. All manuscripts will be subjected to a peer-review process. The intended audience of the journal are professional economists and young researchers with an interest and expertise in microeconomics and above. In addition to full-length articles MIC is interested in publishing and promoting shorter refereed articles (letters and notes) that are pertinent to the specialist in the field of Microeconomics (broadly defined). MIC will periodically publish special issues with themes of particular interest, including articles solicited from leading scholars as well as authoritative survey articles and meta-analysis on the themed topic. We will also publish book reviews related to microeconomics, and MIC encourages publishing articles from policy practitioners dealing with microeconomic issues that have policy relevance under the section Policy Analysis and Debate.