印度银行的业绩和收益波动:公共部门与私营部门

Kuldeep Singh
{"title":"印度银行的业绩和收益波动:公共部门与私营部门","authors":"Kuldeep Singh","doi":"10.1108/jeas-07-2023-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis current study draws a comparison between the performance indicators of public sector banks (PSBs) and private sector banks (or non-PSBs) in India. The study controls for the impact of COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses strongly balanced panel data for seven years of 12 PSBs and 10 non-PSBs from the Nifty PSU Bank Index and Nifty Private Bank Index. The study applies panel data methodology to arrive at the results.FindingsThe study demonstrates that the behavior of indicators of performance and returns volatility for PSBs and non-PSBs differs substantially. While factors like capital adequacy ratio (CAR), cost management (COST), liquidity (LIQ), inflation and economic growth exhibit a similar impact on both categories of Indian banks, the effect of credit risk (RISK), market power (POWER) and COVID-19 on performance and returns stability is different for PSBs and non-PSBs.Research limitations/implicationsThere is a limited sample size of banks in India.Practical implicationsPSBs and non-PSBs need distinct treatments when calibrating performance indicators.Social implicationsThe performance and stability of banks are essential for society at large, the depositors and the investors.Originality/valueThe study provides vibrant implications for insight for banks to calibrate the variables that determine performance and stability, regulators and policymakers for effective governance of the banking ecosystem and effective utilization of public funds and capital. The findings are relevant for policymaking today, when the government is considering the privatization of a few PSBs.","PeriodicalId":508444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"177 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and returns volatility of banks in India: public versus private sector\",\"authors\":\"Kuldeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jeas-07-2023-0181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis current study draws a comparison between the performance indicators of public sector banks (PSBs) and private sector banks (or non-PSBs) in India. The study controls for the impact of COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses strongly balanced panel data for seven years of 12 PSBs and 10 non-PSBs from the Nifty PSU Bank Index and Nifty Private Bank Index. The study applies panel data methodology to arrive at the results.FindingsThe study demonstrates that the behavior of indicators of performance and returns volatility for PSBs and non-PSBs differs substantially. While factors like capital adequacy ratio (CAR), cost management (COST), liquidity (LIQ), inflation and economic growth exhibit a similar impact on both categories of Indian banks, the effect of credit risk (RISK), market power (POWER) and COVID-19 on performance and returns stability is different for PSBs and non-PSBs.Research limitations/implicationsThere is a limited sample size of banks in India.Practical implicationsPSBs and non-PSBs need distinct treatments when calibrating performance indicators.Social implicationsThe performance and stability of banks are essential for society at large, the depositors and the investors.Originality/valueThe study provides vibrant implications for insight for banks to calibrate the variables that determine performance and stability, regulators and policymakers for effective governance of the banking ecosystem and effective utilization of public funds and capital. The findings are relevant for policymaking today, when the government is considering the privatization of a few PSBs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-07-2023-0181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-07-2023-0181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究对印度公共部门银行(PSB)和私营部门银行(或非公共部门银行)的绩效指标进行了比较。研究采用了 Nifty PSU 银行指数和 Nifty Private 银行指数中 12 家公共部门银行和 10 家非公共部门银行七年的强平衡面板数据。研究结果研究结果表明,公共服务银行和非公共服务银行的业绩指标和回报波动行为存在很大差异。虽然资本充足率 (CAR)、成本管理 (COST)、流动性 (LIQ)、通货膨胀和经济增长等因素对印度两类银行的影响相似,但信用风险 (RISK)、市场力量 (POWER) 和 COVID-19 对私营和非私营银行的绩效和回报稳定性的影响不同。社会影响银行的绩效和稳定性对整个社会、储户和投资者都至关重要。原创性/价值本研究提供了富有启发性的见解,有助于银行校准决定绩效和稳定性的变量、监管机构和政策制定者有效治理银行生态系统以及有效利用公共资金和资本。目前,政府正在考虑将几家公共服务银行私有化,因此研究结果对当前的政策制定具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and returns volatility of banks in India: public versus private sector
PurposeThis current study draws a comparison between the performance indicators of public sector banks (PSBs) and private sector banks (or non-PSBs) in India. The study controls for the impact of COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses strongly balanced panel data for seven years of 12 PSBs and 10 non-PSBs from the Nifty PSU Bank Index and Nifty Private Bank Index. The study applies panel data methodology to arrive at the results.FindingsThe study demonstrates that the behavior of indicators of performance and returns volatility for PSBs and non-PSBs differs substantially. While factors like capital adequacy ratio (CAR), cost management (COST), liquidity (LIQ), inflation and economic growth exhibit a similar impact on both categories of Indian banks, the effect of credit risk (RISK), market power (POWER) and COVID-19 on performance and returns stability is different for PSBs and non-PSBs.Research limitations/implicationsThere is a limited sample size of banks in India.Practical implicationsPSBs and non-PSBs need distinct treatments when calibrating performance indicators.Social implicationsThe performance and stability of banks are essential for society at large, the depositors and the investors.Originality/valueThe study provides vibrant implications for insight for banks to calibrate the variables that determine performance and stability, regulators and policymakers for effective governance of the banking ecosystem and effective utilization of public funds and capital. The findings are relevant for policymaking today, when the government is considering the privatization of a few PSBs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信