刑事案件中公证契约的降级(对 Sidoarjo 地区法院第 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda 号判决的分析)

Miftakhul Huda, Ivanda Aprilia
{"title":"刑事案件中公证契约的降级(对 Sidoarjo 地区法院第 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda 号判决的分析)","authors":"Miftakhul Huda, Ivanda Aprilia","doi":"10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the legal consequences of misuse of notary authority to make deeds. Notaries in carrying out the duties of their office must be careful and careful in making deeds, so that the deeds they make are not legally defective because they must be accounted to the general public and so as not to harm others. This research uses a conceptual approach and a legal approach. Using a conceptual approach, researchers refer to legal principles related to the concept of the state of letters in the case of forgery of letters. The legal approach is carried out by reviewing related laws and regulations. This research is analytical in nature that studies the purpose of law, the values of justice, the truth of the rule of law, legal concepts and legal norms according to the position of deeds in relation to the implementation of the duties of unscrupulous authentic deed makers. The results of this study conclude that the criteria for a notary deed to become an authentic deed have been regulated in the law, so that Notaries who are officials who are authorized to make authentic deeds must always pay attention to the procedures for making deeds in accordance with applicable laws. When the deed loses its evidentiary power, it can be relegated to a deed under hand, or become invalid or become null and void. So the Notary Public must be responsible for his negligence in exercising his authority. If the authentic deed in its making is a legal defect caused solely by the fault of the Notary and then the deed in Court is declared inauthentic, or invalid, or becomes null and void or relegated to a deed under hand, then the Notary concerned must be liable for the error caused by the forgery of the deed.","PeriodicalId":505313,"journal":{"name":"Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degradasi Akta Notaris dalam Perkara Pidan (Analisa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Nomor: 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda)\",\"authors\":\"Miftakhul Huda, Ivanda Aprilia\",\"doi\":\"10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the legal consequences of misuse of notary authority to make deeds. Notaries in carrying out the duties of their office must be careful and careful in making deeds, so that the deeds they make are not legally defective because they must be accounted to the general public and so as not to harm others. This research uses a conceptual approach and a legal approach. Using a conceptual approach, researchers refer to legal principles related to the concept of the state of letters in the case of forgery of letters. The legal approach is carried out by reviewing related laws and regulations. This research is analytical in nature that studies the purpose of law, the values of justice, the truth of the rule of law, legal concepts and legal norms according to the position of deeds in relation to the implementation of the duties of unscrupulous authentic deed makers. The results of this study conclude that the criteria for a notary deed to become an authentic deed have been regulated in the law, so that Notaries who are officials who are authorized to make authentic deeds must always pay attention to the procedures for making deeds in accordance with applicable laws. When the deed loses its evidentiary power, it can be relegated to a deed under hand, or become invalid or become null and void. So the Notary Public must be responsible for his negligence in exercising his authority. If the authentic deed in its making is a legal defect caused solely by the fault of the Notary and then the deed in Court is declared inauthentic, or invalid, or becomes null and void or relegated to a deed under hand, then the Notary concerned must be liable for the error caused by the forgery of the deed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v3i1.2224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定滥用公证权订立契约的法律后果。公证人在履行其职责时,必须小心谨慎地订立契约,使其订立的契约在法律上不存在缺陷,因为这些契约必须对广大公众负责,以免损害他人利益。本研究采用概念方法和法律方法。使用概念方法时,研究人员参考了与伪造书信案件中书信状态概念相关的法律原则。法律方法是通过查阅相关法律法规来实现的。本研究具有分析性,根据契约的地位研究法律的目的、正义的价值、法治的真理、法律概念和法律规范,与无良的真实契约制作者履行职责有关。本研究的结果得出结论,公证契约成为真实契约的标准已经在法律中做出了规定,因此,作为有权制作真实契约的官员的公证人必须时刻注意根据适用法律的规定履行契约制作程序。当契约失去证明力时,就可能沦为手头契约,或成为无效契约,或成为无效契约。因此,公证人必须对自己在行使权力时的疏忽负责。如果真实的契约在制作过程中完全是由于公证人的过失而造成法律上的缺陷,然后在法庭上被宣布为不真实、无效、失效或降级为手头契约,那么有关公证人必须对伪造契约所造成的错误承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Degradasi Akta Notaris dalam Perkara Pidan (Analisa Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Nomor: 862/Pid.B/2019/PN Sda)
This study aims to determine the legal consequences of misuse of notary authority to make deeds. Notaries in carrying out the duties of their office must be careful and careful in making deeds, so that the deeds they make are not legally defective because they must be accounted to the general public and so as not to harm others. This research uses a conceptual approach and a legal approach. Using a conceptual approach, researchers refer to legal principles related to the concept of the state of letters in the case of forgery of letters. The legal approach is carried out by reviewing related laws and regulations. This research is analytical in nature that studies the purpose of law, the values of justice, the truth of the rule of law, legal concepts and legal norms according to the position of deeds in relation to the implementation of the duties of unscrupulous authentic deed makers. The results of this study conclude that the criteria for a notary deed to become an authentic deed have been regulated in the law, so that Notaries who are officials who are authorized to make authentic deeds must always pay attention to the procedures for making deeds in accordance with applicable laws. When the deed loses its evidentiary power, it can be relegated to a deed under hand, or become invalid or become null and void. So the Notary Public must be responsible for his negligence in exercising his authority. If the authentic deed in its making is a legal defect caused solely by the fault of the Notary and then the deed in Court is declared inauthentic, or invalid, or becomes null and void or relegated to a deed under hand, then the Notary concerned must be liable for the error caused by the forgery of the deed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信