{"title":"体育教学中以游戏为中心的战术比较方法的内容和质量:系统回顾","authors":"Ray Breed, R. Lindsay, A. Kittel, M. Spittle","doi":"10.3102/00346543241227236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective teaching pedagogies and curriculum frameworks in school physical education have been regularly changing and widely debated. However, teachers have predominately used technical and sport-based approaches, but tactical game-centered approaches (TGAs) are becoming more common when teaching games in physical education. This review systematically described the content and the quality of research that compared TGAs with other teaching approaches within school physical education. All 24 studies that were found compared a technical approach (TA) or control group with a TGA, and most originated from Western Europe. Studies were conducted equally in primary and secondary schools, most research was mixed-gender, and the majority incorporated a single sport to compare teaching approaches. The quality of reporting was mostly low with a moderate to serious risk of bias. Studies commonly showed that TGAs improved student outcomes in tactical skill; skill execution; affective, procedural knowledge and/or physical activity; and TAs improved skill execution and technical skill.","PeriodicalId":506584,"journal":{"name":"Review of Educational Research","volume":"21 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content and Quality of Comparative Tactical Game-Centered Approaches in Physical Education: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Ray Breed, R. Lindsay, A. Kittel, M. Spittle\",\"doi\":\"10.3102/00346543241227236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective teaching pedagogies and curriculum frameworks in school physical education have been regularly changing and widely debated. However, teachers have predominately used technical and sport-based approaches, but tactical game-centered approaches (TGAs) are becoming more common when teaching games in physical education. This review systematically described the content and the quality of research that compared TGAs with other teaching approaches within school physical education. All 24 studies that were found compared a technical approach (TA) or control group with a TGA, and most originated from Western Europe. Studies were conducted equally in primary and secondary schools, most research was mixed-gender, and the majority incorporated a single sport to compare teaching approaches. The quality of reporting was mostly low with a moderate to serious risk of bias. Studies commonly showed that TGAs improved student outcomes in tactical skill; skill execution; affective, procedural knowledge and/or physical activity; and TAs improved skill execution and technical skill.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"21 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241227236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241227236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学校体育的有效教学法和课程框架一直在不断变化,并引起了广泛的讨论。然而,在体育教学中,教师主要采用技术和运动教学法,但以战术游戏为中心的教学法(TGA)在体育游戏教学中正变得越来越普遍。本综述系统地描述了在学校体育教学中比较 TGA 与其他教学方法的研究内容和质量。所有 24 项研究都将技术方法(TA)或对照组与 TGA 进行了比较,其中大部分研究来自西欧。研究同样在小学和中学进行,大多数研究是男女生混合进行的,而且大多数研究都采用单一运动项目来比较教学方法。报告的质量大多较低,存在中度至严重的偏倚风险。研究普遍表明,TGAs 提高了学生在战术技能、技能执行、情感、程序知识和/或体育活动方面的成绩;而 TAs 提高了技能执行和技术技能。
Content and Quality of Comparative Tactical Game-Centered Approaches in Physical Education: A Systematic Review
Effective teaching pedagogies and curriculum frameworks in school physical education have been regularly changing and widely debated. However, teachers have predominately used technical and sport-based approaches, but tactical game-centered approaches (TGAs) are becoming more common when teaching games in physical education. This review systematically described the content and the quality of research that compared TGAs with other teaching approaches within school physical education. All 24 studies that were found compared a technical approach (TA) or control group with a TGA, and most originated from Western Europe. Studies were conducted equally in primary and secondary schools, most research was mixed-gender, and the majority incorporated a single sport to compare teaching approaches. The quality of reporting was mostly low with a moderate to serious risk of bias. Studies commonly showed that TGAs improved student outcomes in tactical skill; skill execution; affective, procedural knowledge and/or physical activity; and TAs improved skill execution and technical skill.