在言论和行为中为隐私保护者辩护:中华人民共和国的数据治理战略框架

Ruoxi Wang, Chi Zhang, Yaxiong Lei
{"title":"在言论和行为中为隐私保护者辩护:中华人民共和国的数据治理战略框架","authors":"Ruoxi Wang, Chi Zhang, Yaxiong Lei","doi":"10.1080/03932729.2024.2315064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The People ’ s Republic of China ’ s (PRC) approach to data governance, centred on data sovereignty, is much debated in academic literature. However, it remains unclear how the PRC ’ s di ff erent state actors justify this approach. Based on an analysis of the discourse and behaviour of the PRC ’ s state actors through strategic framing theory, their role as a privacy guardian can arguably be described as strategically constructed. The Chinese government and legislative bodies have tailored their communications to present themselves as champions of individual privacy, aiming to secure support for state policies. This strategic framing encompasses four mechanisms: the reframing of privacy threats through political narratives; legal ambiguities; selective framing; and the implementation of censorship to in fl uence public discourse. An examination of how the Chinese government responded di ff erently to data breaches in the cases of Didi and the Shanghai National Police Database leak highlights the Chinese government ’ s e ff orts in maintaining framing consistency to construct itself as a guardian, rather than a violator, of individual privacy.","PeriodicalId":501365,"journal":{"name":"The International Spectator","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justifying a Privacy Guardian in Discourse and Behaviour: The People’s Republic of China’s Strategic Framing in Data Governance\",\"authors\":\"Ruoxi Wang, Chi Zhang, Yaxiong Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03932729.2024.2315064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The People ’ s Republic of China ’ s (PRC) approach to data governance, centred on data sovereignty, is much debated in academic literature. However, it remains unclear how the PRC ’ s di ff erent state actors justify this approach. Based on an analysis of the discourse and behaviour of the PRC ’ s state actors through strategic framing theory, their role as a privacy guardian can arguably be described as strategically constructed. The Chinese government and legislative bodies have tailored their communications to present themselves as champions of individual privacy, aiming to secure support for state policies. This strategic framing encompasses four mechanisms: the reframing of privacy threats through political narratives; legal ambiguities; selective framing; and the implementation of censorship to in fl uence public discourse. An examination of how the Chinese government responded di ff erently to data breaches in the cases of Didi and the Shanghai National Police Database leak highlights the Chinese government ’ s e ff orts in maintaining framing consistency to construct itself as a guardian, rather than a violator, of individual privacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Spectator\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Spectator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2315064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Spectator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2315064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中华人民共和国(PRC)以数据主权为核心的数据治理方法在学术文献中引起了广泛讨论。然而,中国不同的国家行为者如何证明这种方法的合理性,这一点仍不清楚。通过战略框架理论对中国国家行为者的言论和行为进行分析,可以说中国作为隐私保护者的角色是战略构建出来的。中国政府和立法机构在沟通中将自己塑造成个人隐私的捍卫者,以确保国家政策得到支持。这种战略构架包括四种机制:通过政治叙事重塑隐私威胁;法律模糊性;选择性构架;以及实施审查以影响公众言论。通过研究中国政府在滴滴和上海国家警察数据库泄露事件中对数据泄露的不同反应,我们可以发现中国政府在保持框架一致性方面的努力,从而将自己塑造成个人隐私的保护者而非侵犯者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justifying a Privacy Guardian in Discourse and Behaviour: The People’s Republic of China’s Strategic Framing in Data Governance
The People ’ s Republic of China ’ s (PRC) approach to data governance, centred on data sovereignty, is much debated in academic literature. However, it remains unclear how the PRC ’ s di ff erent state actors justify this approach. Based on an analysis of the discourse and behaviour of the PRC ’ s state actors through strategic framing theory, their role as a privacy guardian can arguably be described as strategically constructed. The Chinese government and legislative bodies have tailored their communications to present themselves as champions of individual privacy, aiming to secure support for state policies. This strategic framing encompasses four mechanisms: the reframing of privacy threats through political narratives; legal ambiguities; selective framing; and the implementation of censorship to in fl uence public discourse. An examination of how the Chinese government responded di ff erently to data breaches in the cases of Didi and the Shanghai National Police Database leak highlights the Chinese government ’ s e ff orts in maintaining framing consistency to construct itself as a guardian, rather than a violator, of individual privacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信