免疫 PET 方法的进步与挑战

Philipp Mohr, Joyce van Sluis, M. L. Lub-de Hooge, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Adrienne H Brouwers, C. Tsoumpas
{"title":"免疫 PET 方法的进步与挑战","authors":"Philipp Mohr, Joyce van Sluis, M. L. Lub-de Hooge, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Adrienne H Brouwers, C. Tsoumpas","doi":"10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) enables imaging of specific targets that play a role in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, such as antigens on cell membranes, targets in the disease microenvironment or immune cells. The most common immunoPET applications use a monoclonal antibody labeled with a relatively long-lived positron emitter such as 89Zr (T1/2 = 78.4 h), but also smaller antibody-based constructs labeled with various other positron emitting radionuclides are being investigated. Thereby, this molecular imaging technique can guide the development of new drugs and may have a pivotal role in selecting patients for a particular therapy. In early phase immunoPET trials, multiple imaging time points are used to examine the time-dependent biodistribution and to determine the optimal imaging time point, which may be several days after tracer injection due to the slow kinetics of larger molecules. Once this has been established, usually only one static scan is performed and semi-quantitative values are reported. However, total PET uptake of a tracer is the sum of specific and nonspecific uptake. In addition, uptake may be affected by other factors such as perfusion, pre-/co-administration of the unlabeled molecule, and the treatment schedule. This article reviews imaging methodology used in immunoPET studies and is divided in two parts. The first part summarizes the vast majority of clinical immunoPET studies applying semi-quantitative methodology. The second part focuses on a handful of studies applying pharmacokinetic models and includes preclinical and simulation studies. Finally, the potential and challenges in immunoPET quantification methodology are discussed within the context of the recent technological advancements provided by long axial field of view PET/CT scanners.","PeriodicalId":505895,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Mohr, Joyce van Sluis, M. L. Lub-de Hooge, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Adrienne H Brouwers, C. Tsoumpas\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) enables imaging of specific targets that play a role in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, such as antigens on cell membranes, targets in the disease microenvironment or immune cells. The most common immunoPET applications use a monoclonal antibody labeled with a relatively long-lived positron emitter such as 89Zr (T1/2 = 78.4 h), but also smaller antibody-based constructs labeled with various other positron emitting radionuclides are being investigated. Thereby, this molecular imaging technique can guide the development of new drugs and may have a pivotal role in selecting patients for a particular therapy. In early phase immunoPET trials, multiple imaging time points are used to examine the time-dependent biodistribution and to determine the optimal imaging time point, which may be several days after tracer injection due to the slow kinetics of larger molecules. Once this has been established, usually only one static scan is performed and semi-quantitative values are reported. However, total PET uptake of a tracer is the sum of specific and nonspecific uptake. In addition, uptake may be affected by other factors such as perfusion, pre-/co-administration of the unlabeled molecule, and the treatment schedule. This article reviews imaging methodology used in immunoPET studies and is divided in two parts. The first part summarizes the vast majority of clinical immunoPET studies applying semi-quantitative methodology. The second part focuses on a handful of studies applying pharmacokinetic models and includes preclinical and simulation studies. Finally, the potential and challenges in immunoPET quantification methodology are discussed within the context of the recent technological advancements provided by long axial field of view PET/CT scanners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1360710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫正电子发射断层扫描(immunoPET)可对在靶向治疗和免疫治疗中发挥作用的特定靶点(如细胞膜上的抗原、疾病微环境中的靶点或免疫细胞)进行成像。最常见的免疫发射计算机断层显像应用使用的是用 89Zr(T1/2 = 78.4 小时)等寿命相对较长的正电子发射体标记的单克隆抗体,但也有人正在研究用其他各种正电子发射放射性核素标记的较小的抗体构建体。因此,这种分子成像技术可以指导新药的开发,并可能在选择患者接受特定治疗方面发挥关键作用。在早期阶段的免疫 PET 试验中,会使用多个成像时间点来检查随时间变化的生物分布,并确定最佳成像时间点,由于大分子的缓慢动力学,最佳成像时间点可能是示踪剂注射后的数天。一旦确定,通常只进行一次静态扫描,并报告半定量值。然而,示踪剂的 PET 摄取总量是特异性和非特异性摄取的总和。此外,摄取量还可能受到其他因素的影响,如灌注、未标记分子的预先/联合给药以及治疗计划。本文回顾了免疫 PET 研究中使用的成像方法,分为两部分。第一部分总结了绝大多数应用半定量方法进行的临床免疫 PET 研究。第二部分侧重于少数应用药代动力学模型的研究,包括临床前研究和模拟研究。最后,结合长轴向视野 PET/CT 扫描仪带来的最新技术进步,讨论了免疫 PET 定量方法的潜力和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology
Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) enables imaging of specific targets that play a role in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, such as antigens on cell membranes, targets in the disease microenvironment or immune cells. The most common immunoPET applications use a monoclonal antibody labeled with a relatively long-lived positron emitter such as 89Zr (T1/2 = 78.4 h), but also smaller antibody-based constructs labeled with various other positron emitting radionuclides are being investigated. Thereby, this molecular imaging technique can guide the development of new drugs and may have a pivotal role in selecting patients for a particular therapy. In early phase immunoPET trials, multiple imaging time points are used to examine the time-dependent biodistribution and to determine the optimal imaging time point, which may be several days after tracer injection due to the slow kinetics of larger molecules. Once this has been established, usually only one static scan is performed and semi-quantitative values are reported. However, total PET uptake of a tracer is the sum of specific and nonspecific uptake. In addition, uptake may be affected by other factors such as perfusion, pre-/co-administration of the unlabeled molecule, and the treatment schedule. This article reviews imaging methodology used in immunoPET studies and is divided in two parts. The first part summarizes the vast majority of clinical immunoPET studies applying semi-quantitative methodology. The second part focuses on a handful of studies applying pharmacokinetic models and includes preclinical and simulation studies. Finally, the potential and challenges in immunoPET quantification methodology are discussed within the context of the recent technological advancements provided by long axial field of view PET/CT scanners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信