除草剂抗药性管理:共同资源问题?

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Weed Science Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1017/wsc.2024.12
Nicolas T. Bergmann, Ian C. Burke, C. Wardropper
{"title":"除草剂抗药性管理:共同资源问题?","authors":"Nicolas T. Bergmann, Ian C. Burke, C. Wardropper","doi":"10.1017/wsc.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Herbicide resistance is often viewed as a complex problem in need of innovative management solutions. Because of the transboundary mobility of many weeds, resistance to herbicides is also viewed as a community-scale issue. Consequently, the idea of greater coordination among resource users – especially growers – is often promoted as a management approach. Recently, scholars have framed herbicide resistance as a commons problem in need of collective action. Specifically, social scientists have explored the utility of adopting bottom-up community-based approaches to help solve the growing problem of herbicide resistance through a framework for interpreting the commons known as common pool resource theory. This article analyzes how herbicide resistance fits – and fails to fit – within common pool resource theory and offers an updated conceptual framework from which to build future work. We argue that the application of common pool resource theory to herbicide resistance management is underdeveloped and approaches based on this theory have shown little success. The relevance of common pool resource theory for informing herbicide resistance management is less settled than existing scholarship has suggested and other frameworks for approaching transboundary resource problems – such as co-production of knowledge and participatory action research – warrant consideration.","PeriodicalId":23688,"journal":{"name":"Weed Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicide Resistance Management: A Common Pool Resource Problem?\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas T. Bergmann, Ian C. Burke, C. Wardropper\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wsc.2024.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Herbicide resistance is often viewed as a complex problem in need of innovative management solutions. Because of the transboundary mobility of many weeds, resistance to herbicides is also viewed as a community-scale issue. Consequently, the idea of greater coordination among resource users – especially growers – is often promoted as a management approach. Recently, scholars have framed herbicide resistance as a commons problem in need of collective action. Specifically, social scientists have explored the utility of adopting bottom-up community-based approaches to help solve the growing problem of herbicide resistance through a framework for interpreting the commons known as common pool resource theory. This article analyzes how herbicide resistance fits – and fails to fit – within common pool resource theory and offers an updated conceptual framework from which to build future work. We argue that the application of common pool resource theory to herbicide resistance management is underdeveloped and approaches based on this theory have shown little success. The relevance of common pool resource theory for informing herbicide resistance management is less settled than existing scholarship has suggested and other frameworks for approaching transboundary resource problems – such as co-production of knowledge and participatory action research – warrant consideration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.12\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.12","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除草剂抗药性通常被视为一个需要创新管理解决方案的复杂问题。由于许多杂草具有跨界流动性,对除草剂的抗药性也被视为一个社区范围的问题。因此,加强资源使用者(尤其是种植者)之间的协调往往被作为一种管理方法加以推广。最近,学者们将除草剂抗药性视为一个需要集体行动的公共问题。具体来说,社会科学家们通过一种被称为 "公有资源理论 "的公有地解释框架,探讨了采用自下而上的社区方法来帮助解决日益严重的除草剂抗药性问题的效用。本文分析了除草剂抗药性是如何与公共资源理论相适应的,以及如何与之失效,并提供了一个最新的概念框架,供今后开展工作时参考。我们认为,共同资源库理论在除草剂抗药性管理方面的应用还不够成熟,基于该理论的方法收效甚微。共同资源理论在为除草剂抗药性管理提供信息方面的相关性并不像现有学术研究所认为的那样确定,其他处理跨界资源问题的框架--如知识的共同生产和参与式行动研究--值得考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herbicide Resistance Management: A Common Pool Resource Problem?
Herbicide resistance is often viewed as a complex problem in need of innovative management solutions. Because of the transboundary mobility of many weeds, resistance to herbicides is also viewed as a community-scale issue. Consequently, the idea of greater coordination among resource users – especially growers – is often promoted as a management approach. Recently, scholars have framed herbicide resistance as a commons problem in need of collective action. Specifically, social scientists have explored the utility of adopting bottom-up community-based approaches to help solve the growing problem of herbicide resistance through a framework for interpreting the commons known as common pool resource theory. This article analyzes how herbicide resistance fits – and fails to fit – within common pool resource theory and offers an updated conceptual framework from which to build future work. We argue that the application of common pool resource theory to herbicide resistance management is underdeveloped and approaches based on this theory have shown little success. The relevance of common pool resource theory for informing herbicide resistance management is less settled than existing scholarship has suggested and other frameworks for approaching transboundary resource problems – such as co-production of knowledge and participatory action research – warrant consideration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Science
Weed Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science in agricultural systems. Topics for Weed Science include: - the biology and ecology of weeds in agricultural, forestry, aquatic, turf, recreational, rights-of-way and other settings, genetics of weeds - herbicide resistance, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and molecular action of herbicides and plant growth regulators used to manage undesirable vegetation - ecology of cropping and other agricultural systems as they relate to weed management - biological and ecological aspects of weed control tools including biological agents, and herbicide resistant crops - effect of weed management on soil, air and water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信