S. Ankathi, Utkarsh S. Chaudhari, Robert M. Handler, David R. Shonnard
{"title":"厌氧消化厨余和动物粪便产生沼气的可持续性","authors":"S. Ankathi, Utkarsh S. Chaudhari, Robert M. Handler, David R. Shonnard","doi":"10.3390/applmicrobiol4010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaerobic digestion (AD) involves a set of microbiological reactions and physio-chemical processes to generate biogas, a mixture of predominantly CH4 and CO2. It is commercialized globally; however, AD has limited commercial applications in the U.S. compared to other regions of the world. The main objective of this article is to review different studies on socio-economic and environmental aspects and policies of biogas/biomethane production and to focus on resource availability. The key outcome from this review shows that the anaerobic digestion of food waste and animal manure has great potential to achieve economic and environmental benefits compared to other waste management techniques such as landfilling or conventional manure management. The 12 life cycle assessment (LCA) studies reviewed showed lower impacts for biogas systems and indicated a need for standardization of methodology so that alternative production concepts can be objectively compared. Similarly, economic analyses showed higher profitability for a biogas combined heat and power facility compared to a biomethane facility. By considering a review of the sustainability of biogas, we presented a new multi-criteria sustainable assessment framework that includes three domains: i. resource availability and logistics, ii. process modeling, and iii. impact assessment with primary application to the optimum location and installation of sustainable biogas/biomethane plants in the U.S.","PeriodicalId":502845,"journal":{"name":"Applied Microbiology","volume":"65 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Animal Manure\",\"authors\":\"S. Ankathi, Utkarsh S. Chaudhari, Robert M. Handler, David R. Shonnard\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/applmicrobiol4010029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anaerobic digestion (AD) involves a set of microbiological reactions and physio-chemical processes to generate biogas, a mixture of predominantly CH4 and CO2. It is commercialized globally; however, AD has limited commercial applications in the U.S. compared to other regions of the world. The main objective of this article is to review different studies on socio-economic and environmental aspects and policies of biogas/biomethane production and to focus on resource availability. The key outcome from this review shows that the anaerobic digestion of food waste and animal manure has great potential to achieve economic and environmental benefits compared to other waste management techniques such as landfilling or conventional manure management. The 12 life cycle assessment (LCA) studies reviewed showed lower impacts for biogas systems and indicated a need for standardization of methodology so that alternative production concepts can be objectively compared. Similarly, economic analyses showed higher profitability for a biogas combined heat and power facility compared to a biomethane facility. By considering a review of the sustainability of biogas, we presented a new multi-criteria sustainable assessment framework that includes three domains: i. resource availability and logistics, ii. process modeling, and iii. impact assessment with primary application to the optimum location and installation of sustainable biogas/biomethane plants in the U.S.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"65 S1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol4010029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol4010029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
厌氧消化(AD)涉及一系列微生物反应和物理化学过程,以产生沼气(主要是 CH4 和 CO2 的混合物)。厌氧消化已在全球实现商业化,但与世界其他地区相比,厌氧消化在美国的商业应用有限。本文的主要目的是回顾有关沼气/生物甲烷生产的社会经济和环境方面及政策的不同研究,并重点关注资源可用性。综述的主要结果表明,与填埋或传统粪便管理等其他废物管理技术相比,厌氧消化食物垃圾和动物粪便在实现经济和环境效益方面具有巨大潜力。所审查的 12 项生命周期评估(LCA)研究表明,沼气系统受到的影响较小,并指出有必要实现方法标准化,以便客观地比较替代生产概念。同样,经济分析表明,与生物甲烷设施相比,沼气热电联产设施的盈利能力更高。通过对沼气可持续性的审查,我们提出了一个新的多标准可持续评估框架,其中包括三个领域:i. 资源可用性和物流;ii. 过程建模;iii. 影响评估,主要应用于美国可持续沼气/生物甲烷工厂的最佳选址和安装。
Sustainability of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Animal Manure
Anaerobic digestion (AD) involves a set of microbiological reactions and physio-chemical processes to generate biogas, a mixture of predominantly CH4 and CO2. It is commercialized globally; however, AD has limited commercial applications in the U.S. compared to other regions of the world. The main objective of this article is to review different studies on socio-economic and environmental aspects and policies of biogas/biomethane production and to focus on resource availability. The key outcome from this review shows that the anaerobic digestion of food waste and animal manure has great potential to achieve economic and environmental benefits compared to other waste management techniques such as landfilling or conventional manure management. The 12 life cycle assessment (LCA) studies reviewed showed lower impacts for biogas systems and indicated a need for standardization of methodology so that alternative production concepts can be objectively compared. Similarly, economic analyses showed higher profitability for a biogas combined heat and power facility compared to a biomethane facility. By considering a review of the sustainability of biogas, we presented a new multi-criteria sustainable assessment framework that includes three domains: i. resource availability and logistics, ii. process modeling, and iii. impact assessment with primary application to the optimum location and installation of sustainable biogas/biomethane plants in the U.S.