利用植物功能结构模型评估 Goudriaan 的带状树冠截光总结模型

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shuangwei Li, W. van der Werf, Fang Gou, Junqi Zhu, Herman N C Berghuijs, Hu Zhou, Yan Guo, B. Li, Yuntao Ma, J. Evers
{"title":"利用植物功能结构模型评估 Goudriaan 的带状树冠截光总结模型","authors":"Shuangwei Li, W. van der Werf, Fang Gou, Junqi Zhu, Herman N C Berghuijs, Hu Zhou, Yan Guo, B. Li, Yuntao Ma, J. Evers","doi":"10.1093/insilicoplants/diae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Dealing with heterogeneity in leaf canopies when calculating light interception per species in a mixed canopy is a challenge. Goudriaan developed a computationally simple, though conceptually sophisticated, model for light interception in strip canopies, which can be reasonably represented as “blocks”, such as vineyards and crop rows. This model is widely used, but there is no independent verification of the model. Hence, we developed a comparison of light interception calculations with Goudriaan’s model and with detailed spatially explicit three-dimensional functional-structural plant models (FSPM) of maize in which plant architecture can be represented explicitly. Two models were developed, one with small randomly oriented leaves in blocks, similar to Goudriaan’s assumption, which we refer to as the intermediate model (IM), and another with a realistic representation of individual plants with stems and leaves having shape, orientation, etc, referred as FSPM. In IM and FSPM, light interception was calculated using ray tracing. In Goudriaan’s model, the light extinction coefficient (k), including both its daily and seasonal average values, was generated using the FSPM. Correspondence between the three models was excellent in terms of light capture for different levels of crop height, leaf area and uniformity, with the difference less than 3.3%. The results are strong support for the use of Goudriaan's summary model for calculating light interception in strip canopies.","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of Goudriaan's summary model for light interception in strip canopies, using functional-structural plant models\",\"authors\":\"Shuangwei Li, W. van der Werf, Fang Gou, Junqi Zhu, Herman N C Berghuijs, Hu Zhou, Yan Guo, B. Li, Yuntao Ma, J. Evers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/insilicoplants/diae002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Dealing with heterogeneity in leaf canopies when calculating light interception per species in a mixed canopy is a challenge. Goudriaan developed a computationally simple, though conceptually sophisticated, model for light interception in strip canopies, which can be reasonably represented as “blocks”, such as vineyards and crop rows. This model is widely used, but there is no independent verification of the model. Hence, we developed a comparison of light interception calculations with Goudriaan’s model and with detailed spatially explicit three-dimensional functional-structural plant models (FSPM) of maize in which plant architecture can be represented explicitly. Two models were developed, one with small randomly oriented leaves in blocks, similar to Goudriaan’s assumption, which we refer to as the intermediate model (IM), and another with a realistic representation of individual plants with stems and leaves having shape, orientation, etc, referred as FSPM. In IM and FSPM, light interception was calculated using ray tracing. In Goudriaan’s model, the light extinction coefficient (k), including both its daily and seasonal average values, was generated using the FSPM. Correspondence between the three models was excellent in terms of light capture for different levels of crop height, leaf area and uniformity, with the difference less than 3.3%. The results are strong support for the use of Goudriaan's summary model for calculating light interception in strip canopies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"in silico Plants\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"in silico Plants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diae002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在计算混合树冠中每个物种的截光量时,如何处理叶冠的异质性是一项挑战。Goudriaan 建立了一个计算简单但概念复杂的模型,用于计算条状树冠的截光量,条状树冠可以合理地表示为 "区块",如葡萄园和作物行。该模型被广泛使用,但没有独立的验证。因此,我们将截光计算与 Goudriaan 的模型以及玉米的详细空间明确三维功能-结构植物模型(FSPM)进行了比较,其中植物结构可以明确表示。我们开发了两种模型,一种是类似于古德里安假设的块状随机定向小叶片模型,我们称之为中间模型(IM);另一种是具有茎和叶的形状、方向等的单个植物的现实表示,我们称之为功能-结构植物模型(FSPM)。在 IM 和 FSPM 模型中,光拦截是通过光线跟踪计算得出的。在 Goudriaan 模型中,光消光系数(k),包括其日平均值和季节平均值,都是用 FSPM 生成的。就不同作物高度、叶面积和均匀度水平下的光捕获而言,三个模型之间的对应性非常好,差异小于 3.3%。这些结果有力地支持了使用 Goudriaan 的总结模型来计算条状树冠的截光量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of Goudriaan's summary model for light interception in strip canopies, using functional-structural plant models
Dealing with heterogeneity in leaf canopies when calculating light interception per species in a mixed canopy is a challenge. Goudriaan developed a computationally simple, though conceptually sophisticated, model for light interception in strip canopies, which can be reasonably represented as “blocks”, such as vineyards and crop rows. This model is widely used, but there is no independent verification of the model. Hence, we developed a comparison of light interception calculations with Goudriaan’s model and with detailed spatially explicit three-dimensional functional-structural plant models (FSPM) of maize in which plant architecture can be represented explicitly. Two models were developed, one with small randomly oriented leaves in blocks, similar to Goudriaan’s assumption, which we refer to as the intermediate model (IM), and another with a realistic representation of individual plants with stems and leaves having shape, orientation, etc, referred as FSPM. In IM and FSPM, light interception was calculated using ray tracing. In Goudriaan’s model, the light extinction coefficient (k), including both its daily and seasonal average values, was generated using the FSPM. Correspondence between the three models was excellent in terms of light capture for different levels of crop height, leaf area and uniformity, with the difference less than 3.3%. The results are strong support for the use of Goudriaan's summary model for calculating light interception in strip canopies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信