宫颈癌患者盆腔外扩张术的效果:临床经验

Q4 Medicine
G. A. Khakimov, G. Khakimova
{"title":"宫颈癌患者盆腔外扩张术的效果:临床经验","authors":"G. A. Khakimov, G. Khakimova","doi":"10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Despite the progress in pelvic exenteration (PE) technique in international oncological practice, it is still debatable for cancer surgeons. The main reasons for its unpopularity are technical complexity, high rate of intra- and postoperative complications (60%), high postoperative mortality (30%), and challenging postoperative rehabilitation of patients. \nAim. To evaluate long-term outcomes after pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer. \nMaterials and methods. From September 2021 to December 2022, 23 PEs were performed, including 12 total and 11 anterior. The mean age was 52.2±10.0 years (range 39–83 years). All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer: 7 (30%) with stage II, 8 (35%) with stage III, and 8 (35%) with stage IV according to the TNM classification. Histologically, cervical cancer was represented by moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. PE was preceded by the following treatments: neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 17 (74%) patients, surgical treatment in 4 (17%) patients, and chemoradiotherapy in 2 (9%) patients. More than half (56%) of patients achieved grade 2 therapeutic pathomorphism. The advanced disease involved the following adjacent organs: bladder (16; 70%), intestines (13; 56%), uterine endometrium (7; 30%), myometrium and parametrium (4; 17%), fallopian tubes, vagina, and ovary (2; 9%). \nResults. The average follow-up time for patients was 9.4±8.8 months. Median time to progression – 8.7 months [5.9; 10.8]. During the observation period, 78.3% (18/23) of patients died. Progression was recorded in 39.1% (9/23) of patients. The 1-year overall survival of patients was 38.7% (median 8.9 months). The 1-year tumor-specific survival rate was 60.6% (median 14.1 months). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63.0 and 49.0% (median, 13.4 months), respectively. \nConclusion. During the observation period, death occurred in 54.6% (12/23) of cases in the anterior PE group, and in 25% (6/23) in the total group. The median overall survival with anterior PE is 2 times higher compared to total PE (9.6 months versus 4.1 months). Median PFS was 13.4 months. For patients after anterior and total pelvic exenteration, 1-year PFS was 51.9±17.6 and 72.9±13.5; 3-year – 25.9±15.7 and 72.9±13.5 (p=0.178), respectively. Thus, PE is justified and significantly expands the possibilities of surgical treatment.","PeriodicalId":16401,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Oncology","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of pelvic exenteration in patients with cervical cancer: clinical experience\",\"authors\":\"G. A. Khakimov, G. Khakimova\",\"doi\":\"10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Despite the progress in pelvic exenteration (PE) technique in international oncological practice, it is still debatable for cancer surgeons. The main reasons for its unpopularity are technical complexity, high rate of intra- and postoperative complications (60%), high postoperative mortality (30%), and challenging postoperative rehabilitation of patients. \\nAim. To evaluate long-term outcomes after pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer. \\nMaterials and methods. From September 2021 to December 2022, 23 PEs were performed, including 12 total and 11 anterior. The mean age was 52.2±10.0 years (range 39–83 years). All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer: 7 (30%) with stage II, 8 (35%) with stage III, and 8 (35%) with stage IV according to the TNM classification. Histologically, cervical cancer was represented by moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. PE was preceded by the following treatments: neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 17 (74%) patients, surgical treatment in 4 (17%) patients, and chemoradiotherapy in 2 (9%) patients. More than half (56%) of patients achieved grade 2 therapeutic pathomorphism. The advanced disease involved the following adjacent organs: bladder (16; 70%), intestines (13; 56%), uterine endometrium (7; 30%), myometrium and parametrium (4; 17%), fallopian tubes, vagina, and ovary (2; 9%). \\nResults. The average follow-up time for patients was 9.4±8.8 months. Median time to progression – 8.7 months [5.9; 10.8]. During the observation period, 78.3% (18/23) of patients died. Progression was recorded in 39.1% (9/23) of patients. The 1-year overall survival of patients was 38.7% (median 8.9 months). The 1-year tumor-specific survival rate was 60.6% (median 14.1 months). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63.0 and 49.0% (median, 13.4 months), respectively. \\nConclusion. During the observation period, death occurred in 54.6% (12/23) of cases in the anterior PE group, and in 25% (6/23) in the total group. The median overall survival with anterior PE is 2 times higher compared to total PE (9.6 months versus 4.1 months). Median PFS was 13.4 months. For patients after anterior and total pelvic exenteration, 1-year PFS was 51.9±17.6 and 72.9±13.5; 3-year – 25.9±15.7 and 72.9±13.5 (p=0.178), respectively. Thus, PE is justified and significantly expands the possibilities of surgical treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Oncology\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。尽管骨盆外扩(PE)技术在国际肿瘤临床实践中取得了进展,但癌症外科医生对其仍有争议。其不受欢迎的主要原因是技术复杂、术中和术后并发症发生率高(60%)、术后死亡率高(30%)以及患者术后康复困难。目的评估局部晚期复发性宫颈癌患者盆腔外扩张术后的长期疗效。材料与方法。自 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 12 月,共进行了 23 例骨盆外扩张术,包括 12 例全骨盆外扩张术和 11 例前骨盆外扩张术。平均年龄为(52.2±10.0)岁(39-83 岁)。所有患者均被诊断为局部晚期复发性宫颈癌:根据TNM分类,7例(30%)为II期,8例(35%)为III期,8例(35%)为IV期。组织学上,宫颈癌以中度分化的鳞状细胞癌为代表。在进行宫颈癌根治术之前,患者接受了以下治疗:17 例(74%)患者接受了新辅助化疗,4 例(17%)患者接受了手术治疗,2 例(9%)患者接受了放化疗。半数以上(56%)患者的治疗病理形态达到 2 级。晚期疾病累及以下邻近器官:膀胱(16;70%)、肠道(13;56%)、子宫内膜(7;30%)、子宫肌层和宫旁(4;17%)、输卵管、阴道和卵巢(2;9%)。结果患者的平均随访时间为(9.4±8.8)个月。病情恶化的中位时间为 8.7 个月 [5.9; 10.8]。在观察期间,78.3%(18/23)的患者死亡。39.1%(9/23)的患者病情有所进展。患者的 1 年总生存率为 38.7%(中位数为 8.9 个月)。肿瘤特异性生存率为60.6%(中位数为14.1个月)。1年和3年无进展生存期(PFS)分别为63.0%和49.0%(中位13.4个月)。结论在观察期内,前路PE组有54.6%(12/23)的病例死亡,而全组有25%(6/23)的病例死亡。前路 PE 的中位总生存期是全 PE 的 2 倍(9.6 个月对 4.1 个月)。中位生存期为 13.4 个月。前路和全骨盆外展术后患者的 1 年 PFS 分别为(51.9±17.6)和(72.9±13.5);3 年 PFS 分别为(25.9±15.7)和(72.9±13.5)(P=0.178)。因此,PE 是合理的,并极大地扩展了手术治疗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of pelvic exenteration in patients with cervical cancer: clinical experience
Background. Despite the progress in pelvic exenteration (PE) technique in international oncological practice, it is still debatable for cancer surgeons. The main reasons for its unpopularity are technical complexity, high rate of intra- and postoperative complications (60%), high postoperative mortality (30%), and challenging postoperative rehabilitation of patients. Aim. To evaluate long-term outcomes after pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer. Materials and methods. From September 2021 to December 2022, 23 PEs were performed, including 12 total and 11 anterior. The mean age was 52.2±10.0 years (range 39–83 years). All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer: 7 (30%) with stage II, 8 (35%) with stage III, and 8 (35%) with stage IV according to the TNM classification. Histologically, cervical cancer was represented by moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. PE was preceded by the following treatments: neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 17 (74%) patients, surgical treatment in 4 (17%) patients, and chemoradiotherapy in 2 (9%) patients. More than half (56%) of patients achieved grade 2 therapeutic pathomorphism. The advanced disease involved the following adjacent organs: bladder (16; 70%), intestines (13; 56%), uterine endometrium (7; 30%), myometrium and parametrium (4; 17%), fallopian tubes, vagina, and ovary (2; 9%). Results. The average follow-up time for patients was 9.4±8.8 months. Median time to progression – 8.7 months [5.9; 10.8]. During the observation period, 78.3% (18/23) of patients died. Progression was recorded in 39.1% (9/23) of patients. The 1-year overall survival of patients was 38.7% (median 8.9 months). The 1-year tumor-specific survival rate was 60.6% (median 14.1 months). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63.0 and 49.0% (median, 13.4 months), respectively. Conclusion. During the observation period, death occurred in 54.6% (12/23) of cases in the anterior PE group, and in 25% (6/23) in the total group. The median overall survival with anterior PE is 2 times higher compared to total PE (9.6 months versus 4.1 months). Median PFS was 13.4 months. For patients after anterior and total pelvic exenteration, 1-year PFS was 51.9±17.6 and 72.9±13.5; 3-year – 25.9±15.7 and 72.9±13.5 (p=0.178), respectively. Thus, PE is justified and significantly expands the possibilities of surgical treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Oncology
Journal of Modern Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信