无人机噪音因飞行动作和机型而异:对动物调查的影响

Erin N Macke, Landon Richard Jones, Raymond Iglay, Jared A Elmore
{"title":"无人机噪音因飞行动作和机型而异:对动物调查的影响","authors":"Erin N Macke, Landon Richard Jones, Raymond Iglay, Jared A Elmore","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drones are becoming a common tool for animal monitoring; however, sound emitted from drones may disturb animals and bias survey results. Understanding noise levels produced by different flight maneuvers, altitudes [i.e., above ground level (AGL)], and drone models could mitigate animal disturbance during surveys. We measured maximum sound (dB) emitted during three flight maneuvers (hovering, flyover, turning) among eight AGLs (15-120 m) and two vertical maneuvers (ascending, descending) for 4 commercially available quadcopter drone models (DJI Matrice 300, Matrice 200, Phantom 3, and Autel Evo II), accounting for wind speed and comparing to ambient (background) noise. Ascending, descending, and hovering produced more noise compared to flyover and turning maneuvers. One large drone (Matrice 200, 4.7 kg) produced more noise than the two smaller drones (Evo II, 1.2 kg and Phantom 3, 1.1 kg). However, the largest drone (Matrice 300, 6.4 kg) produced noise similar to smaller models and was the quietest among all models from 75–120 m AGL, providing potential size advantages with less noise disturbance. Our results indicate that flights consisting of flyover and turning maneuvers likely cause less noise disturbance than surveys with prolonged hovering over animals.","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drone noise differs by flight maneuver and model: implications for animal surveys\",\"authors\":\"Erin N Macke, Landon Richard Jones, Raymond Iglay, Jared A Elmore\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/dsa-2023-0054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drones are becoming a common tool for animal monitoring; however, sound emitted from drones may disturb animals and bias survey results. Understanding noise levels produced by different flight maneuvers, altitudes [i.e., above ground level (AGL)], and drone models could mitigate animal disturbance during surveys. We measured maximum sound (dB) emitted during three flight maneuvers (hovering, flyover, turning) among eight AGLs (15-120 m) and two vertical maneuvers (ascending, descending) for 4 commercially available quadcopter drone models (DJI Matrice 300, Matrice 200, Phantom 3, and Autel Evo II), accounting for wind speed and comparing to ambient (background) noise. Ascending, descending, and hovering produced more noise compared to flyover and turning maneuvers. One large drone (Matrice 200, 4.7 kg) produced more noise than the two smaller drones (Evo II, 1.2 kg and Phantom 3, 1.1 kg). However, the largest drone (Matrice 300, 6.4 kg) produced noise similar to smaller models and was the quietest among all models from 75–120 m AGL, providing potential size advantages with less noise disturbance. Our results indicate that flights consisting of flyover and turning maneuvers likely cause less noise disturbance than surveys with prolonged hovering over animals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drone Systems and Applications\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drone Systems and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无人机正逐渐成为动物监测的常用工具;然而,无人机发出的声音可能会干扰动物并使调查结果出现偏差。了解不同的飞行动作、飞行高度(即离地面高度(AGL))和无人机型号所产生的噪音水平,可以减轻调查过程中对动物的干扰。我们测量了 4 种商用四旋翼无人机型号(DJI Matrice 300、Matrice 200、Phantom 3 和 Autel Evo II)在 8 个 AGL(15-120 米)和 2 个垂直机动(上升、下降)中 3 个飞行机动(悬停、飞越、转弯)期间发出的最大声音(分贝),考虑了风速并与环境(背景)噪声进行了比较。与飞越和转弯动作相比,上升、下降和悬停产生的噪音更大。一架大型无人机(Matrice 200,4.7 千克)比两架小型无人机(Evo II,1.2 千克和 Phantom 3,1.1 千克)产生的噪音更大。不过,最大的无人机(Matrice 300,6.4 千克)产生的噪音与较小的机型相似,在 75-120 米高度范围内是所有机型中最安静的。我们的研究结果表明,与在动物上空长时间盘旋的调查相比,由飞越和转弯机动组成的飞行可能会造成较小的噪声干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drone noise differs by flight maneuver and model: implications for animal surveys
Drones are becoming a common tool for animal monitoring; however, sound emitted from drones may disturb animals and bias survey results. Understanding noise levels produced by different flight maneuvers, altitudes [i.e., above ground level (AGL)], and drone models could mitigate animal disturbance during surveys. We measured maximum sound (dB) emitted during three flight maneuvers (hovering, flyover, turning) among eight AGLs (15-120 m) and two vertical maneuvers (ascending, descending) for 4 commercially available quadcopter drone models (DJI Matrice 300, Matrice 200, Phantom 3, and Autel Evo II), accounting for wind speed and comparing to ambient (background) noise. Ascending, descending, and hovering produced more noise compared to flyover and turning maneuvers. One large drone (Matrice 200, 4.7 kg) produced more noise than the two smaller drones (Evo II, 1.2 kg and Phantom 3, 1.1 kg). However, the largest drone (Matrice 300, 6.4 kg) produced noise similar to smaller models and was the quietest among all models from 75–120 m AGL, providing potential size advantages with less noise disturbance. Our results indicate that flights consisting of flyover and turning maneuvers likely cause less noise disturbance than surveys with prolonged hovering over animals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信