专有利益和明知故犯:拜尔斯诉沙特国家银行 [2023] UKSC 51

Anita Purewal
{"title":"专有利益和明知故犯:拜尔斯诉沙特国家银行 [2023] UKSC 51","authors":"Anita Purewal","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The long-awaited Supreme Court ruling in Byers v Saudi National Bank has provided a welcomed judgment on an established claim in equity and trusts law, knowing receipt. The judgment not only provides guidance on an issue which has never been directly addressed at the Supreme Court level before, namely whether a continuing proprietary interest is needed for a successful claim in knowing receipt, but also provides much-needed clarification on the underlying basis and application of knowing receipt claims moving forwards, guidance that will be renowned for years to come.","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proprietary interests and knowing receipt: Byers v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51\",\"authors\":\"Anita Purewal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttae004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The long-awaited Supreme Court ruling in Byers v Saudi National Bank has provided a welcomed judgment on an established claim in equity and trusts law, knowing receipt. The judgment not only provides guidance on an issue which has never been directly addressed at the Supreme Court level before, namely whether a continuing proprietary interest is needed for a successful claim in knowing receipt, but also provides much-needed clarification on the underlying basis and application of knowing receipt claims moving forwards, guidance that will be renowned for years to come.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttae004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttae004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最高法院在拜尔斯诉沙特国家银行一案中做出了令人期待已久的裁决,对衡平法和信托法中的一项既定索赔--明知收货--做出了值得欢迎的判决。该判决不仅就最高法院以前从未直接处理过的一个问题提供了指导,即成功的知情收据索赔是否需要持续的所有权利益,而且还就知情收据索赔的基本依据和今后的适用提供了亟需的澄清,这一指导将在未来数年内享有盛誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proprietary interests and knowing receipt: Byers v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51
The long-awaited Supreme Court ruling in Byers v Saudi National Bank has provided a welcomed judgment on an established claim in equity and trusts law, knowing receipt. The judgment not only provides guidance on an issue which has never been directly addressed at the Supreme Court level before, namely whether a continuing proprietary interest is needed for a successful claim in knowing receipt, but also provides much-needed clarification on the underlying basis and application of knowing receipt claims moving forwards, guidance that will be renowned for years to come.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信