从洪水预测角度对两种降雨短期预报方法进行水文验证

M. Poletti, M. Lagasio, Antonio Parodi, Massimo Milelli, Vincenzo Mazzarella, Stefano Federico, Lorenzo Campo, Marco Falzacappa, F. Silvestro
{"title":"从洪水预测角度对两种降雨短期预报方法进行水文验证","authors":"M. Poletti, M. Lagasio, Antonio Parodi, Massimo Milelli, Vincenzo Mazzarella, Stefano Federico, Lorenzo Campo, Marco Falzacappa, F. Silvestro","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0125.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFlood forecast remains a significant challenge, particularly when dealing with basins characterized by small drainage areas (i.e. 103 km2 or lower with response time in the range 0.5-10 h) especially because of the rainfall prediction uncertainties (Buzzi et al., 2014) . This study aims to investigate the performances of streamflow predictions using two short-term rainfall forecast methods.\nThese methods utilize a combination of nowcasting extrapolation algorithm and numerical weather predictions by employing three-dimensional variational assimilation system and nudging assimilation techniques, meteorological radar and lightning data are frequently updated, allowing new forecasts with high temporal frequency (i.e. 1-3 hours). A distributed hydrological model is used to convert rainfall forecasts in streamflow prediction. The potential of assimilating radar and lightning data or radar data alone, is also discussed.\nA hindcast experiment on two rainy periods in the north-west region of Italy was designed. The selected skill scores were analyzed to assess their degradation with increasing lead time, and the results were further aggregated based on basin dimensions to investigate the catchment integration effect. The findings indicate that both rainfall forecast methods yield good performance, with neither definitively outperforming the other. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that, on average, assimilating both radar and lightning data enhances the performance.","PeriodicalId":503314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrological verification of two rainfall short-term forecasting methods with floods anticipation perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Poletti, M. Lagasio, Antonio Parodi, Massimo Milelli, Vincenzo Mazzarella, Stefano Federico, Lorenzo Campo, Marco Falzacappa, F. Silvestro\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jhm-d-23-0125.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nFlood forecast remains a significant challenge, particularly when dealing with basins characterized by small drainage areas (i.e. 103 km2 or lower with response time in the range 0.5-10 h) especially because of the rainfall prediction uncertainties (Buzzi et al., 2014) . This study aims to investigate the performances of streamflow predictions using two short-term rainfall forecast methods.\\nThese methods utilize a combination of nowcasting extrapolation algorithm and numerical weather predictions by employing three-dimensional variational assimilation system and nudging assimilation techniques, meteorological radar and lightning data are frequently updated, allowing new forecasts with high temporal frequency (i.e. 1-3 hours). A distributed hydrological model is used to convert rainfall forecasts in streamflow prediction. The potential of assimilating radar and lightning data or radar data alone, is also discussed.\\nA hindcast experiment on two rainy periods in the north-west region of Italy was designed. The selected skill scores were analyzed to assess their degradation with increasing lead time, and the results were further aggregated based on basin dimensions to investigate the catchment integration effect. The findings indicate that both rainfall forecast methods yield good performance, with neither definitively outperforming the other. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that, on average, assimilating both radar and lightning data enhances the performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrometeorology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrometeorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0125.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-23-0125.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于降雨预测的不确定性,洪水预报仍然是一项重大挑战,尤其是在处理流域面积较小(即 103 平方公里或更小,响应时间在 0.5-10 小时之间)的流域时更是如此(Buzzi 等人,2014 年)。这些方法采用了三维变异同化系统和推移同化技术,结合使用了现报外推算法和数值天气预报,气象雷达和闪电数据经常更新,因此可以进行高时间频率(即 1-3 小时)的新预报。分布式水文模型用于将降雨预报转换为河水流量预报。此外,还讨论了雷达和闪电数据同化或仅雷达数据同化的可能性。对选定的技能分数进行了分析,以评估其随着准备时间的增加而降低的情况,并根据流域尺寸对结果进行了进一步汇总,以研究流域整合效应。研究结果表明,两种降雨预报方法都具有良好的性能,两者都没有明显的优越性。此外,结果表明,平均而言,雷达和闪电数据同化可提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrological verification of two rainfall short-term forecasting methods with floods anticipation perspective
Flood forecast remains a significant challenge, particularly when dealing with basins characterized by small drainage areas (i.e. 103 km2 or lower with response time in the range 0.5-10 h) especially because of the rainfall prediction uncertainties (Buzzi et al., 2014) . This study aims to investigate the performances of streamflow predictions using two short-term rainfall forecast methods. These methods utilize a combination of nowcasting extrapolation algorithm and numerical weather predictions by employing three-dimensional variational assimilation system and nudging assimilation techniques, meteorological radar and lightning data are frequently updated, allowing new forecasts with high temporal frequency (i.e. 1-3 hours). A distributed hydrological model is used to convert rainfall forecasts in streamflow prediction. The potential of assimilating radar and lightning data or radar data alone, is also discussed. A hindcast experiment on two rainy periods in the north-west region of Italy was designed. The selected skill scores were analyzed to assess their degradation with increasing lead time, and the results were further aggregated based on basin dimensions to investigate the catchment integration effect. The findings indicate that both rainfall forecast methods yield good performance, with neither definitively outperforming the other. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that, on average, assimilating both radar and lightning data enhances the performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信