设计一种实验方法,利用心肺旁路过程中血小板活化的生物标记评估电路涂层的生物兼容性

Meghal Sancheti, Mitchell Rentschler, Charlotte Bolch, Weidang Li, Katelyn Necco, Thomas Rath, Mitra Esfandiarei, Nathaniel Darban
{"title":"设计一种实验方法,利用心肺旁路过程中血小板活化的生物标记评估电路涂层的生物兼容性","authors":"Meghal Sancheti, Mitchell Rentschler, Charlotte Bolch, Weidang Li, Katelyn Necco, Thomas Rath, Mitra Esfandiarei, Nathaniel Darban","doi":"10.1051/ject/2024003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass is an essential component of cardiothoracic surgeries. However, significant complications such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a common occurrence due to contact between circulating blood and foreign surfaces that leads to platelet activation. It is suggested that different available CPB circuit coatings can potentially reduce platelet activation. However, there have been no published evidence-based reports confirming these claims. In addition, there is no well-established protocol for studying platelet activation biomarkers during CPB in vitro in a laboratory setting.  \nMethods: CPB was simulated in the laboratory using bovine blood in two different types of coated CPB circuits: Trillium® Biosurface by Medtronic, and XcoatingTM Surface by Terumo. Fresh bovine blood samples were collected and circulated through the CPB circuit following the standard protocol used in the operation rooms. Blood samples were then collected at 5, 30, and 55 minutes during the circulation. Blood plasmas were separated and subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure most established platelet activation markers P-selectin, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), and β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) at different time points. \nResults: The biomarker values at 30 & 55 minutes were compared to the base values at 5 minutes for each type of CPB circuit. The results of the means from all measured biomarkers showed data measurements that indicated no significant variability within each coating. All collected data points fell within ± 2 SD of the means, which was considered as acceptable variations across technical replicates.  \nConclusion: In this study, we were able to establish an in vitro protocol in the laboratory setting that is precise and reliable with minimum intra-variability. This established protocol will allow for future studies in which different coated CPB circuits can be compared for their effectiveness in blocking platelet activation during the CPB.","PeriodicalId":506828,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing an Experimental Method for Assessing Biocompatibility of Circuit Coatings Using Biomarkers for Platelet Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass\",\"authors\":\"Meghal Sancheti, Mitchell Rentschler, Charlotte Bolch, Weidang Li, Katelyn Necco, Thomas Rath, Mitra Esfandiarei, Nathaniel Darban\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ject/2024003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass is an essential component of cardiothoracic surgeries. However, significant complications such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a common occurrence due to contact between circulating blood and foreign surfaces that leads to platelet activation. It is suggested that different available CPB circuit coatings can potentially reduce platelet activation. However, there have been no published evidence-based reports confirming these claims. In addition, there is no well-established protocol for studying platelet activation biomarkers during CPB in vitro in a laboratory setting.  \\nMethods: CPB was simulated in the laboratory using bovine blood in two different types of coated CPB circuits: Trillium® Biosurface by Medtronic, and XcoatingTM Surface by Terumo. Fresh bovine blood samples were collected and circulated through the CPB circuit following the standard protocol used in the operation rooms. Blood samples were then collected at 5, 30, and 55 minutes during the circulation. Blood plasmas were separated and subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure most established platelet activation markers P-selectin, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), and β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) at different time points. \\nResults: The biomarker values at 30 & 55 minutes were compared to the base values at 5 minutes for each type of CPB circuit. The results of the means from all measured biomarkers showed data measurements that indicated no significant variability within each coating. All collected data points fell within ± 2 SD of the means, which was considered as acceptable variations across technical replicates.  \\nConclusion: In this study, we were able to establish an in vitro protocol in the laboratory setting that is precise and reliable with minimum intra-variability. This established protocol will allow for future studies in which different coated CPB circuits can be compared for their effectiveness in blocking platelet activation during the CPB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心肺旁路是心胸手术的重要组成部分。然而,由于循环血液与异物表面接触导致血小板活化,心肺旁路(CPB)引起的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)等严重并发症屡见不鲜。有人认为,现有的不同 CPB 电路涂层有可能减少血小板的活化。然而,目前还没有公开发表的循证报告证实这些说法。此外,在实验室环境中体外研究 CPB 期间血小板活化生物标志物也没有成熟的方案。方法:在实验室中使用牛血在两种不同类型的涂层 CPB 电路中模拟 CPB:美敦力公司的 Trillium® Biosurface 和泰尔茂公司的 XcoatingTM Surface。按照手术室使用的标准方案采集新鲜牛血样并在 CPB 循环回路中循环。然后在循环过程中的 5 分钟、30 分钟和 55 分钟采集血样。分离血浆并进行酶联免疫吸附试验,以检测不同时间点的血小板活化标志物 P-选择素、血小板因子 4 (PF4)、糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) 和 β-血栓球蛋白 (β-TG)。结果将每种 CPB 电路在 30 和 55 分钟时的生物标志物值与 5 分钟时的基础值进行比较。所有测量的生物标志物的平均值结果显示,数据测量结果表明每个涂层内没有明显的变异。所有收集的数据点均在平均值的 ± 2 SD 范围内,这被认为是技术重复中可接受的变化。结论在这项研究中,我们能够在实验室环境中建立一个体外方案,该方案精确可靠,内部变异性最小。在未来的研究中,我们可以利用这一已确立的方案来比较不同涂层的 CPB 电路在 CPB 期间阻断血小板活化的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing an Experimental Method for Assessing Biocompatibility of Circuit Coatings Using Biomarkers for Platelet Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass is an essential component of cardiothoracic surgeries. However, significant complications such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) resulting from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a common occurrence due to contact between circulating blood and foreign surfaces that leads to platelet activation. It is suggested that different available CPB circuit coatings can potentially reduce platelet activation. However, there have been no published evidence-based reports confirming these claims. In addition, there is no well-established protocol for studying platelet activation biomarkers during CPB in vitro in a laboratory setting.   Methods: CPB was simulated in the laboratory using bovine blood in two different types of coated CPB circuits: Trillium® Biosurface by Medtronic, and XcoatingTM Surface by Terumo. Fresh bovine blood samples were collected and circulated through the CPB circuit following the standard protocol used in the operation rooms. Blood samples were then collected at 5, 30, and 55 minutes during the circulation. Blood plasmas were separated and subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure most established platelet activation markers P-selectin, Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa), and β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) at different time points.  Results: The biomarker values at 30 & 55 minutes were compared to the base values at 5 minutes for each type of CPB circuit. The results of the means from all measured biomarkers showed data measurements that indicated no significant variability within each coating. All collected data points fell within ± 2 SD of the means, which was considered as acceptable variations across technical replicates.   Conclusion: In this study, we were able to establish an in vitro protocol in the laboratory setting that is precise and reliable with minimum intra-variability. This established protocol will allow for future studies in which different coated CPB circuits can be compared for their effectiveness in blocking platelet activation during the CPB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信