相同而又不同

IF 0.3 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Variation Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1075/lv.23042.iva

I. Ivaska, Anne Tamm

{"title":"相同而又不同","authors":"I. Ivaska, Anne Tamm","doi":"10.1075/lv.23042.iva","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article compares the distributional differences in the use of the partitive object cases in Estonian and\n Finnish via multifactorial modeling in contrastive research using the European Parliament parallel text corpus. Based on previous\n contrastive research on Finnic, we expected the principles of object case marking to be similar for Estonian and Finnish\n (confirmed), and the partitive objects to be more numerous in Estonian than in Finnish (not confirmed, as countable objects with\n scalar verbs proved less likely to be partitive in Estonian). We hypothesized that multifactorial modeling in contrastive research\n design could help identify the causes for variation and unfold subtle differences between related language systems. Since\n preferences related to grammatical voice and constituent order revealed subtle differences between the systems, this hypothesis\n was confirmed.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same yet different\",\"authors\":\"I. Ivaska, Anne Tamm\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lv.23042.iva\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The article compares the distributional differences in the use of the partitive object cases in Estonian and\\n Finnish via multifactorial modeling in contrastive research using the European Parliament parallel text corpus. Based on previous\\n contrastive research on Finnic, we expected the principles of object case marking to be similar for Estonian and Finnish\\n (confirmed), and the partitive objects to be more numerous in Estonian than in Finnish (not confirmed, as countable objects with\\n scalar verbs proved less likely to be partitive in Estonian). We hypothesized that multifactorial modeling in contrastive research\\n design could help identify the causes for variation and unfold subtle differences between related language systems. Since\\n preferences related to grammatical voice and constituent order revealed subtle differences between the systems, this hypothesis\\n was confirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Variation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23042.iva\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.23042.iva","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文章利用欧洲议会平行文本语料库进行对比研究，通过多因素建模比较了爱沙尼亚语和芬兰语中偏正宾格的分布差异。根据以往对芬兰语的对比研究，我们预计爱沙尼亚语和芬兰语的宾格标记原则相似（已证实），而部分性宾格在爱沙尼亚语中的数量多于芬兰语（未证实，因为标量动词的可数宾格在爱沙尼亚语中被证明为部分性宾格的可能性较小）。我们假设，对比研究设计中的多因素建模可以帮助找出差异的原因，并揭示相关语言系统之间的微妙差异。由于与语法语态和成分顺序有关的偏好揭示了不同系统之间的微妙差异，这一假设得到了证实。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Same yet different

The article compares the distributional differences in the use of the partitive object cases in Estonian and Finnish via multifactorial modeling in contrastive research using the European Parliament parallel text corpus. Based on previous contrastive research on Finnic, we expected the principles of object case marking to be similar for Estonian and Finnish (confirmed), and the partitive objects to be more numerous in Estonian than in Finnish (not confirmed, as countable objects with scalar verbs proved less likely to be partitive in Estonian). We hypothesized that multifactorial modeling in contrastive research design could help identify the causes for variation and unfold subtle differences between related language systems. Since preferences related to grammatical voice and constituent order revealed subtle differences between the systems, this hypothesis was confirmed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Linguistic Variation LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?