{"title":"Cnemidophorus murinus(Laurenti,1768 年)在库拉索岛的饮食和觅食情况","authors":"Philip Senter","doi":"10.31611/ch.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Curaçao Whiptail (Cnemidophorus murinus) (Squamata: Teiidae) was once considered to have two subspecies, C. m. murinus (endemic to Curaçao and Klein-Curaçao) and C. m. ruthveni (endemic to Bonaire and Klein-Bonaire), but the two are now considered separate species (Ugueto and Harvey 2010). Little has been published on the natural history of C. murinus. Most of the literature on the natural history of “C. murinus” actually pertains to C. ruthveni and includes studies on diet (Dearing and Schall 1992, Schall 1996), body temperature (Schall and Dearing 1994), metabolic expenditure (Bennett and Gleeson 1979), population density and energetics (Bennett and Gorman 1979), signaling behavior (Cooper et al. 2004), escape behavior (Cooper et al. 2003), and learning (Schall 2000). In contrast, published literature on C. murinus that deals with topics other than its taxonomy, morphology, and distribution is limited to a few notes on its parasites (Specian and Whittaker 1980), pathology (Hughes and Delis 2014), clutch size (van Buurt 2011), conservation (van Buurt 2006), and interactions with tourists (van Buurt 2011). Herein I add to the published knowledge of C. murinus with observations on diet and foraging.","PeriodicalId":470800,"journal":{"name":"Caribbean herpetology","volume":"2 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diet and foraging in the Curaçao Whiptail, Cnemidophorus murinus (Laurenti, 1768)\",\"authors\":\"Philip Senter\",\"doi\":\"10.31611/ch.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Curaçao Whiptail (Cnemidophorus murinus) (Squamata: Teiidae) was once considered to have two subspecies, C. m. murinus (endemic to Curaçao and Klein-Curaçao) and C. m. ruthveni (endemic to Bonaire and Klein-Bonaire), but the two are now considered separate species (Ugueto and Harvey 2010). Little has been published on the natural history of C. murinus. Most of the literature on the natural history of “C. murinus” actually pertains to C. ruthveni and includes studies on diet (Dearing and Schall 1992, Schall 1996), body temperature (Schall and Dearing 1994), metabolic expenditure (Bennett and Gleeson 1979), population density and energetics (Bennett and Gorman 1979), signaling behavior (Cooper et al. 2004), escape behavior (Cooper et al. 2003), and learning (Schall 2000). In contrast, published literature on C. murinus that deals with topics other than its taxonomy, morphology, and distribution is limited to a few notes on its parasites (Specian and Whittaker 1980), pathology (Hughes and Delis 2014), clutch size (van Buurt 2011), conservation (van Buurt 2006), and interactions with tourists (van Buurt 2011). Herein I add to the published knowledge of C. murinus with observations on diet and foraging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":470800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caribbean herpetology\",\"volume\":\"2 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caribbean herpetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31611/ch.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caribbean herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31611/ch.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Curaçao Whiptail(Cnemidophorus murinus)(壁虎科:Teiidae)曾被认为有两个亚种,C. m. murinus(库拉索岛和克莱因库拉索岛特有)和 C. m. ruthveni(博内尔岛和克莱因博内尔岛特有),但现在这两个亚种被认为是独立的物种(Ugueto 和 Harvey,2010 年)。有关 C. murinus 自然史的文献很少。大多数有关 "C. murinus "自然史的文献实际上与 C. ruthveni 有关,包括有关饮食(Dearing 和 Schall,1992 年;Schall,1996 年)、体温(Schall 和 Dearing,1994 年)、代谢消耗(Bennett 和 Gleeson,1979 年)、种群密度和能量(Bennett 和 Gorman,1979 年)、信号行为(Cooper 等,2004 年)、逃逸行为(Cooper 等,2003 年)和学习(Schall,2000 年)的研究。相比之下,已发表的关于 C. murinus 的文献中,除了涉及其分类、形态和分布外,还仅限于对其寄生虫(Specian 和 Whittaker,1980 年)、病理学(Hughes 和 Delis,2014 年)、产仔数(van Buurt,2011 年)、保护(van Buurt,2006 年)以及与游客的互动(van Buurt,2011 年)的一些说明。在此,我将通过对 C. murinus 的饮食和觅食情况的观察,补充已发表的相关知识。
Diet and foraging in the Curaçao Whiptail, Cnemidophorus murinus (Laurenti, 1768)
The Curaçao Whiptail (Cnemidophorus murinus) (Squamata: Teiidae) was once considered to have two subspecies, C. m. murinus (endemic to Curaçao and Klein-Curaçao) and C. m. ruthveni (endemic to Bonaire and Klein-Bonaire), but the two are now considered separate species (Ugueto and Harvey 2010). Little has been published on the natural history of C. murinus. Most of the literature on the natural history of “C. murinus” actually pertains to C. ruthveni and includes studies on diet (Dearing and Schall 1992, Schall 1996), body temperature (Schall and Dearing 1994), metabolic expenditure (Bennett and Gleeson 1979), population density and energetics (Bennett and Gorman 1979), signaling behavior (Cooper et al. 2004), escape behavior (Cooper et al. 2003), and learning (Schall 2000). In contrast, published literature on C. murinus that deals with topics other than its taxonomy, morphology, and distribution is limited to a few notes on its parasites (Specian and Whittaker 1980), pathology (Hughes and Delis 2014), clutch size (van Buurt 2011), conservation (van Buurt 2006), and interactions with tourists (van Buurt 2011). Herein I add to the published knowledge of C. murinus with observations on diet and foraging.