A. Biguezoton, S. Adehan, H. Adakal, Honorine Badolo, Mamadou Toure, Sébastien Zoungrana, S. Farougou, Christine Chevillon
{"title":"贝宁和布基纳法索牛蜱传播的病原体有相同的传播媒介:流行率和共同感染模式的变化","authors":"A. Biguezoton, S. Adehan, H. Adakal, Honorine Badolo, Mamadou Toure, Sébastien Zoungrana, S. Farougou, Christine Chevillon","doi":"10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding interactions between pathogens at the level of the individual host and the population in West Africa, may have noteworthy implications for predictions of diseases emergence and disease control programmes. Hence, the current study was aimed at investigating the interactions between Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in West African cattle. Twelve sentinel steers in each of the eight selected herds were randomly chosen to perform a one-year-long survey designed to monthly collect blood sample and to diagnose possible infections of the steers. This allowed identifying A. marginale as the most prevalent pathogen across the three surveyed regions (range: 0.60-1), followed by B. bigemina (0.24-0.85) and B. bovis (0.10-0.64); the same ranking order of the tick-borne pathogens was observed when considering the apparent duration of cattle infection. Regarding interaction patterns, mainly avoidance was revealed between A. marginale and B. bigemina and between B. bigemina and B. bovis. Such negative interaction seemed to be beneficial to the West African cattle surveyed, helping them to escape from babesiosis caused by B. bovis. Altogether, studied Boophilus tick-borne pathogens negatively interact within cattle in Benin and Burkina Faso. This pattern raises new questions regarding the underlying mechanisms and potential consequences. ","PeriodicalId":13808,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences","volume":"18 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cattle tick-borne pathogens sharing the same vectors in Benin and Burkina Faso: variations in prevalence and coinfection patterns\",\"authors\":\"A. Biguezoton, S. Adehan, H. Adakal, Honorine Badolo, Mamadou Toure, Sébastien Zoungrana, S. Farougou, Christine Chevillon\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding interactions between pathogens at the level of the individual host and the population in West Africa, may have noteworthy implications for predictions of diseases emergence and disease control programmes. Hence, the current study was aimed at investigating the interactions between Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in West African cattle. Twelve sentinel steers in each of the eight selected herds were randomly chosen to perform a one-year-long survey designed to monthly collect blood sample and to diagnose possible infections of the steers. This allowed identifying A. marginale as the most prevalent pathogen across the three surveyed regions (range: 0.60-1), followed by B. bigemina (0.24-0.85) and B. bovis (0.10-0.64); the same ranking order of the tick-borne pathogens was observed when considering the apparent duration of cattle infection. Regarding interaction patterns, mainly avoidance was revealed between A. marginale and B. bigemina and between B. bigemina and B. bovis. Such negative interaction seemed to be beneficial to the West African cattle surveyed, helping them to escape from babesiosis caused by B. bovis. Altogether, studied Boophilus tick-borne pathogens negatively interact within cattle in Benin and Burkina Faso. This pattern raises new questions regarding the underlying mechanisms and potential consequences. \",\"PeriodicalId\":13808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"18 1‐2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在西非,了解病原体在宿主个体和种群水平上的相互作用,可能对预测疾病的出现和疾病控制计划具有重要意义。因此,本研究旨在调查西非牛群中的边缘疟原虫、大肠巴贝西亚原虫和牛海绵状芽孢杆菌之间的相互作用。在选定的八个牛群中,每个牛群随机选取 12 头定点母牛,进行为期一年的调查,旨在每月采集血样并诊断母牛可能受到的感染。调查结果表明,在所调查的三个地区中,A. marginale 是最流行的病原体(范围:0.60-1),其次是 B. bigemina(0.24-0.85)和 B. bovis(0.10-0.64);在考虑牛感染的明显持续时间时,也观察到了相同的蜱媒病原体排名顺序。在交互作用模式方面,发现边缘蜱(A. marginale)和大蜱(B. bigemina)之间以及大蜱(B. bigemina)和牛蜱(B. bovis)之间的交互作用主要是回避。这种消极的相互作用似乎对被调查的西非牛有益,有助于它们摆脱牛巴贝斯虫引起的巴贝斯虫病。总之,所研究的嗜褐蜱病原体在贝宁和布基纳法索的牛群中产生了负面作用。这种模式提出了有关潜在机制和潜在后果的新问题。
Cattle tick-borne pathogens sharing the same vectors in Benin and Burkina Faso: variations in prevalence and coinfection patterns
Understanding interactions between pathogens at the level of the individual host and the population in West Africa, may have noteworthy implications for predictions of diseases emergence and disease control programmes. Hence, the current study was aimed at investigating the interactions between Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in West African cattle. Twelve sentinel steers in each of the eight selected herds were randomly chosen to perform a one-year-long survey designed to monthly collect blood sample and to diagnose possible infections of the steers. This allowed identifying A. marginale as the most prevalent pathogen across the three surveyed regions (range: 0.60-1), followed by B. bigemina (0.24-0.85) and B. bovis (0.10-0.64); the same ranking order of the tick-borne pathogens was observed when considering the apparent duration of cattle infection. Regarding interaction patterns, mainly avoidance was revealed between A. marginale and B. bigemina and between B. bigemina and B. bovis. Such negative interaction seemed to be beneficial to the West African cattle surveyed, helping them to escape from babesiosis caused by B. bovis. Altogether, studied Boophilus tick-borne pathogens negatively interact within cattle in Benin and Burkina Faso. This pattern raises new questions regarding the underlying mechanisms and potential consequences.