{"title":"关于数值微分法在确定疲劳裂纹增长率中的应用","authors":"S. Monin, M. A. Gorbovets, I. A. Khodinev","doi":"10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-53-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a sample of test results from 68 compact eccentric tensile specimens made of titanium alloys, nickel alloys and steel, the effect of the choice of numerical differentiation method (secant method and the method of differential polynomials on three, five and seven points) used to calculate the fatigue crack growth rate on characteristics of the linear section of the kinetic diagram of the fatigue failure. The purpose of the study is to determine the advantages, disadvantages and consistent patterns of the considered methods. The coefficient of determination R 2, integral criterion χ which characterizes the difference between the predicted and actual number of cycles corresponding to the section of stable crack growth, and correlation between the logarithms of the Paris constants for alloys of the same class were used as criteria for the correct choice of the method of numerical differentiation. The main results and conclusions of the study: the use of the method of differential polynomials over three points compared to the secant method slightly increases the correlation between the logarithms of the fatigue crack growth rate and the range of the stress intensity factor (an increase in R 2) and increases the difference between the calculated and experimental number of cycles corresponding to stable crack growth (an increase in χ). However, when determining the fatigue crack growth rate by the method of differential polynomials for five and seven points, a more significant smoothing of the experimental data is observed, accompanied by a significant increase in R 2 and a decrease in χ; proximity to zero of the integral accuracy parameter χ is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for good agreement between the test result and the mathematical model that describes it, while the combination of parameters χ and R 2 uniquely forms this criterion; the choice of the method of numerical differentiation does not affect the correlation of the logarithms of the constants of the Paris equation.","PeriodicalId":504498,"journal":{"name":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","volume":"18 9‐10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the application of numerical differentiation methods to the determination of the fatigue crack growth rate\",\"authors\":\"S. Monin, M. A. Gorbovets, I. A. Khodinev\",\"doi\":\"10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-53-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a sample of test results from 68 compact eccentric tensile specimens made of titanium alloys, nickel alloys and steel, the effect of the choice of numerical differentiation method (secant method and the method of differential polynomials on three, five and seven points) used to calculate the fatigue crack growth rate on characteristics of the linear section of the kinetic diagram of the fatigue failure. The purpose of the study is to determine the advantages, disadvantages and consistent patterns of the considered methods. The coefficient of determination R 2, integral criterion χ which characterizes the difference between the predicted and actual number of cycles corresponding to the section of stable crack growth, and correlation between the logarithms of the Paris constants for alloys of the same class were used as criteria for the correct choice of the method of numerical differentiation. The main results and conclusions of the study: the use of the method of differential polynomials over three points compared to the secant method slightly increases the correlation between the logarithms of the fatigue crack growth rate and the range of the stress intensity factor (an increase in R 2) and increases the difference between the calculated and experimental number of cycles corresponding to stable crack growth (an increase in χ). However, when determining the fatigue crack growth rate by the method of differential polynomials for five and seven points, a more significant smoothing of the experimental data is observed, accompanied by a significant increase in R 2 and a decrease in χ; proximity to zero of the integral accuracy parameter χ is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for good agreement between the test result and the mathematical model that describes it, while the combination of parameters χ and R 2 uniquely forms this criterion; the choice of the method of numerical differentiation does not affect the correlation of the logarithms of the constants of the Paris equation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials\",\"volume\":\"18 9‐10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-53-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-53-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用 68 个由钛合金、镍合金和钢制成的紧凑型偏心拉伸试样的测试结果样本,研究了用于计算疲劳裂纹生长率的数值微分法(三次方法和三点、五点和七点微分多项式法)的选择对疲劳破坏动力学图线性截面特征的影响。研究的目的是确定所考虑方法的优缺点和一致模式。确定系数 R 2、表征稳定裂纹增长段对应的预测循环数与实际循环数之间差异的积分标准 χ 以及同类合金的巴黎常数对数之间的相关性被用作正确选择数值微分方法的标准。研究的主要结果和结论:与正割法相比,使用三点微分多项式法会略微增加疲劳裂纹增长速率对数与应力强度因子范围之间的相关性(R 2 增加),并增加稳定裂纹增长对应的计算循环次数与实验循环次数之间的差异(χ 增加)。然而,当采用微分多项式法确定五点和七点的疲劳裂纹生长率时,实验数据出现了更明显的平滑,同时 R 2 显著增加,χ 下降;积分精度参数 χ 接近于零是试验结果与描述试验结果的数学模型之间保持良好一致性的一个必要但不充分的标准,而参数 χ 和 R 2 的组合则唯一地构成了这一标准;数值微分方法的选择并不影响巴黎方程常数对数的相关性。
On the application of numerical differentiation methods to the determination of the fatigue crack growth rate
Using a sample of test results from 68 compact eccentric tensile specimens made of titanium alloys, nickel alloys and steel, the effect of the choice of numerical differentiation method (secant method and the method of differential polynomials on three, five and seven points) used to calculate the fatigue crack growth rate on characteristics of the linear section of the kinetic diagram of the fatigue failure. The purpose of the study is to determine the advantages, disadvantages and consistent patterns of the considered methods. The coefficient of determination R 2, integral criterion χ which characterizes the difference between the predicted and actual number of cycles corresponding to the section of stable crack growth, and correlation between the logarithms of the Paris constants for alloys of the same class were used as criteria for the correct choice of the method of numerical differentiation. The main results and conclusions of the study: the use of the method of differential polynomials over three points compared to the secant method slightly increases the correlation between the logarithms of the fatigue crack growth rate and the range of the stress intensity factor (an increase in R 2) and increases the difference between the calculated and experimental number of cycles corresponding to stable crack growth (an increase in χ). However, when determining the fatigue crack growth rate by the method of differential polynomials for five and seven points, a more significant smoothing of the experimental data is observed, accompanied by a significant increase in R 2 and a decrease in χ; proximity to zero of the integral accuracy parameter χ is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for good agreement between the test result and the mathematical model that describes it, while the combination of parameters χ and R 2 uniquely forms this criterion; the choice of the method of numerical differentiation does not affect the correlation of the logarithms of the constants of the Paris equation.