早产胎膜早破引产或预产期管理后的儿童结局:PPROMEXIL 试验的 10 年跟踪研究

N. Simons, A. D. de Ruigh, J. van’t Hooft, C. Aarnoudse-Moens, M. van Wely, D. P. van der Ham, A. V. van Teeffelen, T. J. Roseboom, B. W. Mol, A. Leemhuis, E. Pajkrt
{"title":"早产胎膜早破引产或预产期管理后的儿童结局:PPROMEXIL 试验的 10 年跟踪研究","authors":"N. Simons, A. D. de Ruigh, J. van’t Hooft, C. Aarnoudse-Moens, M. van Wely, D. P. van der Ham, A. V. van Teeffelen, T. J. Roseboom, B. W. Mol, A. Leemhuis, E. Pajkrt","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001005396.47592.ba","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:588.e1–588.e13)\n Managing late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks’ gestation helps balance the advantages of extending the pregnancy with the risk of intra-amniotic infection. Two Dutch PPROM Expectant Management Versus Induction of Labor (PPROMEXIL) trials were conducted between 2007 and 2011. These randomized controlled studies analyzed induction of labor (IOL) compared to expectant management (EM) in pregnant women with late PPROM. While neonatal sepsis risks were similar between both groups, children at 2 years of age did show slightly higher neurodevelopmental delays with EM compared to IOL. Long-term data on child development beyond age 2 in children born after late PPROM are lacking. The aim of this PPROMEXIL follow-up study was to evaluate the effects of IOL versus EM on child outcomes.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood Outcomes After Induction of Labor or Expectant Management for Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A 10-Year Follow-up of the PPROMEXIL Trials\",\"authors\":\"N. Simons, A. D. de Ruigh, J. van’t Hooft, C. Aarnoudse-Moens, M. van Wely, D. P. van der Ham, A. V. van Teeffelen, T. J. Roseboom, B. W. Mol, A. Leemhuis, E. Pajkrt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aoa.0001005396.47592.ba\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:588.e1–588.e13)\\n Managing late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks’ gestation helps balance the advantages of extending the pregnancy with the risk of intra-amniotic infection. Two Dutch PPROM Expectant Management Versus Induction of Labor (PPROMEXIL) trials were conducted between 2007 and 2011. These randomized controlled studies analyzed induction of labor (IOL) compared to expectant management (EM) in pregnant women with late PPROM. While neonatal sepsis risks were similar between both groups, children at 2 years of age did show slightly higher neurodevelopmental delays with EM compared to IOL. Long-term data on child development beyond age 2 in children born after late PPROM are lacking. The aim of this PPROMEXIL follow-up study was to evaluate the effects of IOL versus EM on child outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001005396.47592.ba\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001005396.47592.ba","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:588.e1-588.e13)在妊娠34+0周至36+6周期间处理晚期早产胎膜早破(PPROM)有助于平衡延长妊娠期的优势与羊膜腔内感染的风险。2007 年至 2011 年间,荷兰进行了两项 PPROM 预产期管理与引产(PPROMEXIL)试验。这些随机对照研究分析了晚期 PPROM 孕妇引产(IOL)与待产管理(EM)的比较。虽然两组的新生儿败血症风险相似,但 2 岁儿童的神经发育迟缓率在 EM 中确实略高于 IOL。目前还缺乏关于晚期 PPROM 后出生的儿童 2 岁后发育情况的长期数据。这项 PPROMEXIL 随访研究旨在评估 IOL 和 EM 对儿童发育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Childhood Outcomes After Induction of Labor or Expectant Management for Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: A 10-Year Follow-up of the PPROMEXIL Trials
(Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228:588.e1–588.e13) Managing late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks’ gestation helps balance the advantages of extending the pregnancy with the risk of intra-amniotic infection. Two Dutch PPROM Expectant Management Versus Induction of Labor (PPROMEXIL) trials were conducted between 2007 and 2011. These randomized controlled studies analyzed induction of labor (IOL) compared to expectant management (EM) in pregnant women with late PPROM. While neonatal sepsis risks were similar between both groups, children at 2 years of age did show slightly higher neurodevelopmental delays with EM compared to IOL. Long-term data on child development beyond age 2 in children born after late PPROM are lacking. The aim of this PPROMEXIL follow-up study was to evaluate the effects of IOL versus EM on child outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信