不同火器消音器结构的性能分析

Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.5755/j02.mech.35196
Vytautas Giedraitis, A. Kilikevičius
{"title":"不同火器消音器结构的性能分析","authors":"Vytautas Giedraitis, A. Kilikevičius","doi":"10.5755/j02.mech.35196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A powerful soundwave from shooting a firearm can travel great distances harming the shooter as well as anyone or anything standing nearby. To address this a firearm suppressor is used. A suppressor muffles the soundwave to a level that is usually safe for the shooter and its environment. A suppressor usually has 3-4 main parts that highly influence its effectiveness. The study aims to investigate how baffle design and placement selection influences the suppressor's effectiveness. The study consists of 162 different baffle design configurations. Suppressors with 3 to 9 baffles, angled from 30 to 60 degrees are simulated in a CFD environment. Slightly rounded baffles as well as different chamber volumes are tested as well. Suppressors with the best designs were then produced and tested on a firing range. At the firing range, a result of 32,24 dB delta was achieved and was only 4,67 % different than the result presented in the CFD study which was 30,8 dB respectively.  The 9 straight geometry baffle angled at 30 degrees suppressor with an average chamber volume proved to be the most efficient and combined with a large initial chamber was the most efficient design in this study.","PeriodicalId":511970,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics","volume":"111 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of Different Firearm Suppressor Structures\",\"authors\":\"Vytautas Giedraitis, A. Kilikevičius\",\"doi\":\"10.5755/j02.mech.35196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A powerful soundwave from shooting a firearm can travel great distances harming the shooter as well as anyone or anything standing nearby. To address this a firearm suppressor is used. A suppressor muffles the soundwave to a level that is usually safe for the shooter and its environment. A suppressor usually has 3-4 main parts that highly influence its effectiveness. The study aims to investigate how baffle design and placement selection influences the suppressor's effectiveness. The study consists of 162 different baffle design configurations. Suppressors with 3 to 9 baffles, angled from 30 to 60 degrees are simulated in a CFD environment. Slightly rounded baffles as well as different chamber volumes are tested as well. Suppressors with the best designs were then produced and tested on a firing range. At the firing range, a result of 32,24 dB delta was achieved and was only 4,67 % different than the result presented in the CFD study which was 30,8 dB respectively.  The 9 straight geometry baffle angled at 30 degrees suppressor with an average chamber volume proved to be the most efficient and combined with a large initial chamber was the most efficient design in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":511970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"111 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.35196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.35196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

枪支射击产生的强大声波可以传播很远的距离,对射击者以及站在附近的任何人或物造成伤害。为了解决这个问题,需要使用枪支消音器。抑制器可将声波消音到通常对射手和周围环境安全的程度。抑制器通常有 3-4 个主要部件,它们对抑制器的效果有很大影响。这项研究旨在调查障板设计和位置选择如何影响抑制器的效果。研究包括 162 种不同的障板设计配置。在 CFD 环境中模拟了 3 至 9 块障板、30 至 60 度角的抑制器。同时还测试了略呈圆形的障板以及不同的腔体容积。然后制作出具有最佳设计的抑制器,并在靶场上进行测试。在靶场上,测试结果为 32.24 dB delta,与 CFD 研究中的结果(分别为 30.8 dB)相比,仅相差 4.67%。 在这项研究中,9 个直形几何障板呈 30 度角,具有平均腔体容积的抑制器被证明是最有效的,结合大的初始腔体是最有效的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis of Different Firearm Suppressor Structures
A powerful soundwave from shooting a firearm can travel great distances harming the shooter as well as anyone or anything standing nearby. To address this a firearm suppressor is used. A suppressor muffles the soundwave to a level that is usually safe for the shooter and its environment. A suppressor usually has 3-4 main parts that highly influence its effectiveness. The study aims to investigate how baffle design and placement selection influences the suppressor's effectiveness. The study consists of 162 different baffle design configurations. Suppressors with 3 to 9 baffles, angled from 30 to 60 degrees are simulated in a CFD environment. Slightly rounded baffles as well as different chamber volumes are tested as well. Suppressors with the best designs were then produced and tested on a firing range. At the firing range, a result of 32,24 dB delta was achieved and was only 4,67 % different than the result presented in the CFD study which was 30,8 dB respectively.  The 9 straight geometry baffle angled at 30 degrees suppressor with an average chamber volume proved to be the most efficient and combined with a large initial chamber was the most efficient design in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信