人工智能(AI)设计不再使用限制人类发展的黑匣子

John W. Murphy, Carlos Largacha-Martínez
{"title":"人工智能(AI)设计不再使用限制人类发展的黑匣子","authors":"John W. Murphy, Carlos Largacha-Martínez","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nAI is considered to be very abstract to a range of critics. In this regard, algorithms are referred to regularly as black boxes and divorced from human intervention. A particular philosophical maneuver supports this outcome. The aim of this article is to (1) bring the philosophy to the surface that has contributed to this distance between AI and people and (2) offer an alternative philosophical position that can bring this technology closer to individuals and communities. The overall goal of the analysis in this paper is the humanising of AI by addressing the shortcomings of conceptualising algorithms as black boxes. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"30 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black Boxes that Curtail Human Flourishing are no Longer Available for Use in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Design\",\"authors\":\"John W. Murphy, Carlos Largacha-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nAI is considered to be very abstract to a range of critics. In this regard, algorithms are referred to regularly as black boxes and divorced from human intervention. A particular philosophical maneuver supports this outcome. The aim of this article is to (1) bring the philosophy to the surface that has contributed to this distance between AI and people and (2) offer an alternative philosophical position that can bring this technology closer to individuals and communities. The overall goal of the analysis in this paper is the humanising of AI by addressing the shortcomings of conceptualising algorithms as black boxes. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":502666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofija. Sociologija\",\"volume\":\"30 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofija. Sociologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija. Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一系列批评者看来,人工智能非常抽象。在这方面,算法经常被称为黑盒子,脱离了人类的干预。一种特殊的哲学手法支持这一结果。本文的目的是:(1) 让造成人工智能与人类之间这种距离的哲学浮出水面;(2) 提供另一种哲学立场,使这项技术更贴近个人和社区。本文分析的总体目标是通过解决将算法概念化为黑盒子的缺陷,实现人工智能的人性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Black Boxes that Curtail Human Flourishing are no Longer Available for Use in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Design
AI is considered to be very abstract to a range of critics. In this regard, algorithms are referred to regularly as black boxes and divorced from human intervention. A particular philosophical maneuver supports this outcome. The aim of this article is to (1) bring the philosophy to the surface that has contributed to this distance between AI and people and (2) offer an alternative philosophical position that can bring this technology closer to individuals and communities. The overall goal of the analysis in this paper is the humanising of AI by addressing the shortcomings of conceptualising algorithms as black boxes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信