Comparison of Bagging and Sparcity Methods for Connectivity Reduction in Spiking Neural Networks with Memristive Plasticity

Developing a spiking neural network architecture that could prospectively be trained on energy-efficient neuromorphic hardware to solve various data analysis tasks requires satisfying the limitations of prospective analog or digital hardware, i.e., local learning and limited numbers of connections, respectively. In this work, we compare two methods of connectivity reduction that are applicable to spiking networks with local plasticity; instead of a large fully-connected network (which is used as the baseline for comparison), we employ either an ensemble of independent small networks or a network with probabilistic sparse connectivity. We evaluate both of these methods with a three-layer spiking neural network, which are applied to handwritten and spoken digit classification tasks using two memristive plasticity models and the classical spike time-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule. Both methods achieve an F1-score of 0.93–0.95 on the handwritten digits recognition task and 0.85–0.93 on the spoken digits recognition task. Applying a combination of both methods made it possible to obtain highly accurate models while reducing the number of connections by more than three times compared to the basic model.