公民科学改变科学的潜力:可持续未来的经验教训

K. Austen, A. Janssen, J. M. Wittmayer, F. Hölker
{"title":"公民科学改变科学的潜力:可持续未来的经验教训","authors":"K. Austen, A. Janssen, J. M. Wittmayer, F. Hölker","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nGlobally, environmental crises are at a critical point. Findings from scientific research are crucial to understand these issues and to inform new policies to address them. Yet the rapidity with which society, industry and lifestyles are changing is not matched in dynamism by institutionalised science, where institutional structures slow the rate of adaptation.\n\nIn this paper, we propose that citizen science can act as a bridge between the ideal and the reality of scientific research, structuring the interface of scientific research with its cultural context. In so doing, citizen science can increase science's ability to address complex ecological problems where data is needed alongside public and policy engagement. As part of a wider movement of informal scientific practices, citizen science can broaden institutionalised science's horizon, foster innovation and create more impact.\n\nDrawing on examples of citizen science practice addressing pollution, we specify ways in which citizen science can provide embedded knowledge and foster alternative practices within the sciences.\n\nWe identify a clash of logics between citizen science and institutional science practice and suggest avenues that could be pursued to improve dialogue between the two.\n\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":508650,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":"101 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential of citizen science to transform science: Lessons for a sustainable future\",\"authors\":\"K. Austen, A. Janssen, J. M. Wittmayer, F. Hölker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pan3.10614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nGlobally, environmental crises are at a critical point. Findings from scientific research are crucial to understand these issues and to inform new policies to address them. Yet the rapidity with which society, industry and lifestyles are changing is not matched in dynamism by institutionalised science, where institutional structures slow the rate of adaptation.\\n\\nIn this paper, we propose that citizen science can act as a bridge between the ideal and the reality of scientific research, structuring the interface of scientific research with its cultural context. In so doing, citizen science can increase science's ability to address complex ecological problems where data is needed alongside public and policy engagement. As part of a wider movement of informal scientific practices, citizen science can broaden institutionalised science's horizon, foster innovation and create more impact.\\n\\nDrawing on examples of citizen science practice addressing pollution, we specify ways in which citizen science can provide embedded knowledge and foster alternative practices within the sciences.\\n\\nWe identify a clash of logics between citizen science and institutional science practice and suggest avenues that could be pursued to improve dialogue between the two.\\n\\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"People and Nature\",\"volume\":\"101 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"People and Nature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球环境危机正处于关键时刻。科学研究的成果对于了解这些问题和制定新的应对政策至关重要。然而,社会、工业和生活方式的快速变化却无法与制度化科学的活力相提并论,制度化科学的结构减缓了适应的速度。在本文中,我们提出公民科学可以作为科学研究理想与现实之间的桥梁,构建科学研究与文化背景之间的界面。这样,公民科学就能提高科学解决复杂生态问题的能力,因为在解决这些问题时,需要数据以及公众和政策的参与。作为更广泛的非正式科学实践运动的一部分,公民科学可以拓宽制度化科学的视野,促进创新并产生更大的影响。我们以公民科学解决污染问题的实践为例,具体说明了公民科学提供嵌入式知识和促进科学内部替代实践的方式。我们发现了公民科学与制度化科学实践之间的逻辑冲突,并提出了改善两者之间对话的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The potential of citizen science to transform science: Lessons for a sustainable future
Globally, environmental crises are at a critical point. Findings from scientific research are crucial to understand these issues and to inform new policies to address them. Yet the rapidity with which society, industry and lifestyles are changing is not matched in dynamism by institutionalised science, where institutional structures slow the rate of adaptation. In this paper, we propose that citizen science can act as a bridge between the ideal and the reality of scientific research, structuring the interface of scientific research with its cultural context. In so doing, citizen science can increase science's ability to address complex ecological problems where data is needed alongside public and policy engagement. As part of a wider movement of informal scientific practices, citizen science can broaden institutionalised science's horizon, foster innovation and create more impact. Drawing on examples of citizen science practice addressing pollution, we specify ways in which citizen science can provide embedded knowledge and foster alternative practices within the sciences. We identify a clash of logics between citizen science and institutional science practice and suggest avenues that could be pursued to improve dialogue between the two. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信